Tampa Tuning dyno results of street tuning package - Page 2 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

SLO RYDE · 06-27-2011, 05:53 PM

Wednesday Morning is Dyno Day

Will post results Wednesday.......................

SLO RYDE · 06-29-2011, 06:26 PM

Well I had my car dyno'ed this morning. I was a little surprised how low the HP was rated. Just curious; should i have pulled more HP??

Here are my MODS:2011 2SS/RS 400hp+?? / K&N CAI./ V Max Throtle Body / Pypes Headers 1 7/8, high flo cats & Pype Bomb exhaust. tuned by "TampaTuning.com"

SGOS252382 · 06-29-2011, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SLO RYDE

Well I had my car dyno'ed this morning. I was a little surprised how low the HP was rated. Just curious; should i have pulled more HP??

Here are my MODS:2011 2SS/RS 400hp+?? / K&N CAI./ V Max Throtle Body / Pypes Headers 1 7/8, high flo cats & Pype Bomb exhaust. tuned by "TampaTuning.com"

Yeah, something doesn't seem right. I'm not much for comparing dyno numbers from different dynos, but those numbers are too low.

Do you know what stock L99s usually make on that dyno?

On average, most L99 A6s fall in this range.
Stock (315 - 330 rwhp)
Tune only (330 - 345 rwhp)
CAI, Long tubes, Tune (350 - 375rwhp)

Some dyno higher than this on generous dynos, but most will fall with in this range.

IndeedSS1 · 06-29-2011, 07:07 PM

What was your AFR? The graph looks choppy compared to my dyno, but I have no idea if that is normal. Here is mine from the last trip.

SLO RYDE · 06-29-2011, 07:11 PM

Started my own thread not to high jack this one
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...65#post3403965

Tampa Tuning · 06-29-2011, 08:10 PM

I not happy with those numbers either, but I responded in the new thread.

Anthony@RWHP · 09-04-2011, 11:59 AM

STD will always report 2-4% higher than SAE. In hot or cold weather. This comes from experiance, I've dyno'd 1000's of cars/trucks on my own dynojet over the years in hot and cold weather. SAE should ALWAYS be the correction used. To take weather out of the equation, the correction should be set to "Uncorrected"

Alot of shops set their dyno to STD and it makes the numbers hard to compare and it's where the "Dynojet reports higher numbers than the mustang dyno" *MYTH* comes from. On at least 10 honest different occasions with various mustang dynos, my dynojet will report within 5 hp/5 ft/lbs of a mustang dyno the car was on hours earlier (same day same weather)

In the end, dyno numbers mean nothing ! The dyno is nothing but a giant expensive torque wrench, it's a tool to measure before and after. The track is where you show results. People put too much stock into dyno numbers.

If everyone would run their dynojets correctly, you'd see more consistant numbers. As for the smoothness, there is adjustment in there for that too. That super smooth "Correction:5" graph would be all choppy too with no smoothness.

06-27-2011, 05:53 PM	#15
SLO RYDE SLO RYDE Drives: 2011 IOM 2SS/RS 400hp+ / K&N CAI./ Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Winter Spings, FL Posts: 355	Wednesday Morning is Dyno Day Will post results Wednesday....................... __________________ 2011 2SS/RS IOM. / K&N CAI./ V Max Throtle Body / Pypes Headers & Pype Bomb exhaust. / Texas Speed 231/236 112 Ls3 cam/ RX Catch Can/ SLP Under Drive Pulley/ American Racing Torque M Wheels painted. / CBD Rear Wing, SunCoast Creations Bumbble Bee Hood, Heritage Grill/ SLP "SS" Badges and tuned by "TampaTuning.com" & Next Level Performance

06-29-2011, 06:26 PM	#16
SLO RYDE SLO RYDE Drives: 2011 IOM 2SS/RS 400hp+ / K&N CAI./ Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Winter Spings, FL Posts: 355	Well I had my car dyno'ed this morning. I was a little surprised how low the HP was rated. Just curious; should i have pulled more HP?? Here are my MODS:2011 2SS/RS 400hp+?? / K&N CAI./ V Max Throtle Body / Pypes Headers 1 7/8, high flo cats & Pype Bomb exhaust. tuned by "TampaTuning.com" Attached Images __________________ 2011 2SS/RS IOM. / K&N CAI./ V Max Throtle Body / Pypes Headers & Pype Bomb exhaust. / Texas Speed 231/236 112 Ls3 cam/ RX Catch Can/ SLP Under Drive Pulley/ American Racing Torque M Wheels painted. / CBD Rear Wing, SunCoast Creations Bumbble Bee Hood, Heritage Grill/ SLP "SS" Badges and tuned by "TampaTuning.com" & Next Level Performance

06-29-2011, 07:07 PM	#18
IndeedSS1 Drives: 2010 Camaro SS LS3 Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Eastern MO Posts: 3,786	What was your AFR? The graph looks choppy compared to my dyno, but I have no idea if that is normal. Here is mine from the last trip. Attached Images __________________ She is only memory now.

06-29-2011, 07:11 PM	#19
SLO RYDE SLO RYDE Drives: 2011 IOM 2SS/RS 400hp+ / K&N CAI./ Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Winter Spings, FL Posts: 355	Started my own thread not to high jack this one http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...65#post3403965 __________________ 2011 2SS/RS IOM. / K&N CAI./ V Max Throtle Body / Pypes Headers & Pype Bomb exhaust. / Texas Speed 231/236 112 Ls3 cam/ RX Catch Can/ SLP Under Drive Pulley/ American Racing Torque M Wheels painted. / CBD Rear Wing, SunCoast Creations Bumbble Bee Hood, Heritage Grill/ SLP "SS" Badges and tuned by "TampaTuning.com" & Next Level Performance

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
V8 Camaro Performance Upgrades List	Milk 1027	Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons	93	08-30-2021 06:56 PM
Texas Speed Long Tubes & Rumbler 5 Cat-Back Dyno Results!	Trevor @ Texas Speed	Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons	48	12-08-2018 03:37 AM
West Chester, PA - Dyno Tuning $300 - Intake and TB Porting $225	AndrewZPSU	V8 Bolt-Ons & Tunes	4	08-25-2010 01:38 PM
* * * Synergy Green Pricing Announced - Option B2E * * *	CamaroScotty	Camaro Price \| Ordering \| Tracking \| Dealers Discussions	20	01-24-2010 04:06 PM

06-29-2011, 08:10 PM	#20
Tampa Tuning Account Suspended Drives: TAMPA TUNING FACEBOOK & INSTAGRAM Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Tampa, Fl Posts: 3,044	I not happy with those numbers either, but I responded in the new thread.

09-04-2011, 11:59 AM	#21
Anthony@RWHP Drives: Turbo Mustang :( Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Stuart Posts: 6	STD will always report 2-4% higher than SAE. In hot or cold weather. This comes from experiance, I've dyno'd 1000's of cars/trucks on my own dynojet over the years in hot and cold weather. SAE should ALWAYS be the correction used. To take weather out of the equation, the correction should be set to "Uncorrected" Alot of shops set their dyno to STD and it makes the numbers hard to compare and it's where the "Dynojet reports higher numbers than the mustang dyno" MYTH comes from. On at least 10 honest different occasions with various mustang dynos, my dynojet will report within 5 hp/5 ft/lbs of a mustang dyno the car was on hours earlier (same day same weather) In the end, dyno numbers mean nothing ! The dyno is nothing but a giant expensive torque wrench, it's a tool to measure before and after. The track is where you show results. People put too much stock into dyno numbers. If everyone would run their dynojets correctly, you'd see more consistant numbers. As for the smoothness, there is adjustment in there for that too. That super smooth "Correction:5" graph would be all choppy too with no smoothness.