![]() |
|
|
#589 | ||
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Quote:
There's still a year to go...or so...perhaps they just don't know, and aren't humble enough to use the "TBD" phrasing... ![]() Quote:
Cheers, my friend. Today was a good day. (for Camaro, and Mustang fans, alike if I must say)
|
||
|
|
|
|
#590 |
![]() Drives: 2012 ZL1, 1997SS NASA Road Racer Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Zanesville, Oh
Posts: 103
|
I'll try to keep this short. I road race a camaro in NASA competition, I am the driver, mechanic and pit crew, so before I say anything else I want to say that I am very proud of what chevy has done with the ZL1, especially given its weight. Secondly, I agree with many here about how regardless of what comes out next year, or from whom, the ZL1 is awesome how it stands. Here is my problem. I believe there was a statement quoted on this site from the ZL1 development team that went something like "we dont just want to beat the mustang, we want to destroy it". Chevy threw down the gauntlet. Now ford of course with a 2013 model has the obvious advantage of besting whatever HP numbers chevy quotes for the 2012 and would be stupid not to do so. Heres the thing: Ford intentionally, and ruthlessly, EMBARRASED the ZL1 team with this announcement. They didnt just best the numbers by 20-30hp as is usually done, they murdered the numbers with 70hp. And I just cant help from hearing that quote again and again in my head. And I dont think this should be moved to a ford vs GM forum, this is a ZL1 issue. This is a matter of a promise to us loyalists, this is a matter of respect and answering not typical model year 'one upsmanship' but a direct insult from ford to chevy. And I understand and (to a degree) agree that HP isnt everything but look what this has done to the ZL1 in the press in just 1 day. Guys, we simply cannot take this lying down, we cannot let the ZL1 get beat by the 500 after all this effort, we cannot. Screw 2013, this needs to be answered NOW. I am sure durability testing has been done on the LSA at higher numbers anticipating future year enhancements, if not slap a pulley on that girl at get to work because the future is as of 11/15/2011. Scott, I've met you, we've talked, you love camaro more than anybody, this can be done. Raising the boost on a CTSV to 12.5 with pulleys and a tune, nothing else, raises HP by about 100, cool the IATs a little more if you have to and get it done. This was not a model year 'gotcha', this was an insult and should be taken as such. This is your legendary ZL1, this is our legendary ZL1. I have and have always had faith. Godfather - this can be done!
your loyal follower - |
|
|
|
|
#591 | |||||
|
Quit being a pu$$y
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() I'm a Camaro fanboy and will never own a Mustang, but Damn it if ford doesn't keep one uping us!
__________________
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
#592 |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
I don't view things that way...(And I don't remember a quote that direct, to be honest)
Actually...I see it as an act of saving-face on the side of Ford...they RARELY announce things this early in advance...so before the final ZL1 info was released and people got in a frenzy...they'd shoot out some of their own to get some of the spotlight. But one thing remains a reality...the ZL1 is real. In a few months, it will be prowling the roads. The '13 GT500 is not. Not yet, anyways. And it will remain to be seen if this 650 hp's bite is as bad as its bark....I'm doubtful. |
|
|
|
|
#593 |
![]() Drives: 69 Chevelle SS396 2013 ZL1 Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: West
Posts: 700
|
I'm amazed a 600 + hp relatively small displacement boosted motor doesn't detonate to death without race fuel like VP C12 or so. What's the highest octane 91 to 94? The Mustard 5.8 with 650 hp must be pushing the limit for sure. The LSA will be pulling timing too with weak gas. So you might not get your advertized horsepower.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#594 |
|
CaRaHoLiC
Drives: '12 ZL1,67 Cam,68 Biscayne 427 4 sp Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 1,701
|
Its still a poo-stick. The front is ugly, the back is ugly and 650 hp is cool, but those cammer engines just sound crappy. They don't have a deep sound, they kinda sound like an outboard motor out of the water.
If I wanted a 1/4 mile car I'd build one out of an SS, or buy the copo, so the ZL1 is still a superior car for a well balanced approach to a sports car. The 500 will be a stab'n steer job, and many insurance claim ditch excursions later will offer up their mighty outboards for use in kit cars and hot rods. If you want one fine, but at the current price of the ZL1, I'm choosing Chevy. |
|
|
|
|
#595 | |
![]() Drives: 2004 Ford Mustang Cobra Join Date: May 2009
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 283
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#596 |
|
CaRaHoLiC
Drives: '12 ZL1,67 Cam,68 Biscayne 427 4 sp Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 1,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
#597 | |
![]() Drives: 69 Chevelle SS396 2013 ZL1 Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: West
Posts: 700
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#598 |
|
Quit being a pu$$y
|
You need to get out to the track more.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#599 |
![]() Drives: 69 Chevelle SS396 2013 ZL1 Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: West
Posts: 700
|
It's just the fuel I'm questioning.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#600 |
![]() Drives: 69 Chevelle SS396 2013 ZL1 Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: West
Posts: 700
|
No hate, just questioning 2.73 HP/CI on 91 octane without detonation. Maybe I have to get out there more.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#601 | |
|
I just like V8s
Drives: 2007 Corvette Z06 Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 919
|
Quote:
http://www.teamjdm.com/2011-mustang-...ercharger-kit/ This is 624 SAE hp @ 9 lbs of boost... http://www.kennebell.net/KBWebsite/S...ustang2011.htm 769 rwhp @ 16 psi boost.... not 8 psi "The entry level 8 psi kit made a staggering 177HP over stock. Kenne Bell is using a huge inlet breathing outside the engine compartment [cold air] while others suck through smaller tubes inside the [hot] engine compartment." Only 177 hp over stock on 8 psi... nowhere near 700+ rwhp. http://store.jpcracing.com/Positive-...ger_c_803.html Those are a bunch of superchargers for the 5.0L not making what you claim can be done on 8 psi. "Produces 525 SAE hp @ 6400 rpm and 470 SAE lb.-ft. @ 4200 rpm, at approximately 7 psi of boost with 93 octane fuel" I can't find anyone making 700+ rwhp on the 5.0L coyote with only 8 lbs of boost. The closest was the JPC Turbo making 615 RWHP on 6 pounds of boost...still shy of 700+ rwhp You are right, haters are going to hate regardless of the facts... EDIT: ANother one from Vortech http://www.vortechsuperchargers.com/product.php?p=174 This is fun: The complete system will boost your stock 2011 GT to 605 HP* and 473 lb/ft* torque with 7.5-8.5 PSI from the V-3 supercharger at the factory redline. *Supercharged horsepower and torque data shown is a calculated estimate based on percentage increases from actual rear wheel HP/Torque measurements. Last edited by Rock36; 11-16-2011 at 02:58 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#602 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 ZL1 Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: St. Joseph
Posts: 1,283
|
Quote:
Why on earth would you suppose Ford would lie about the 3850lb weight? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Poll -- Camaro vs Mustang Supercar Shootout | JusticePete | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 105 | 10-09-2013 03:18 PM |
| Announcing: 2013 Camaro ZL1 Convertible (in Ashen Gray) | BackinBlackSS/RS | Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics | 163 | 10-27-2011 03:29 PM |
| Camaro Still winning - Mustang sales not enough to sustain Flat Rock plant | Rogue Leader | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 141 | 07-02-2011 08:19 AM |
| 2007 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 Convertible | KILLER74Z28 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 10 | 04-11-2008 05:11 PM |
| Ford Shelby Mustang GT500KR | KILLER74Z28 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 17 | 04-05-2007 08:20 PM |