![]() |
|
|
#505 | |
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#506 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,967
|
Quote:
Tune: Maybe 10 HP catback: 5 HP Headers: 15 HP CAI: another 5 - 15 (depending on what you have and the other mods you have) Ported TB: 0 - 5 The numbers would be higher if it was just one mod on a stock car, but once you start adding more mods, the increase in power per mod is not as great as it would be by itself on a stock car. all in all your looking at somewhere between 340 to 350 tops...and thats if all factors like weather are good. If you car is heat soaked...that will lower the numbers but again thats a different discussion. So take 340 * .8 (for an auto - 20% loss or around that) and you get 272rwhp. So I'd guess between 270 and 280 rwhp for an automatic with the above mods.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#507 | |
![]() Drives: 2018 white redline edition Join Date: May 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 52
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#508 |
![]() |
[QUOTE=KMPrenger;5010444
The numbers would be higher if it was just one mod on a stock car, but once you start adding more mods, the increase in power per mod is not as great as it would be by itself on a stock car. [/QUOTE] Well I think that's true to an extent...but. I think anything that has to do with intake. PERSONALLY think that anything to do with intake like cai ported tb and spacer actually aren't used properly without a tune... And I think it's safe to say that if a car was breathing in might actually make it do more hp increase if you up'd the amount of air leaving the car. Just my .02 cents. But I couldn't tell u a spark plug from pudding. So what do I know. But it just sounds logical to me. Last edited by Jinkz; 05-23-2012 at 10:30 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#509 | |
|
crazier than a coconut
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: virginia
Posts: 1,547
|
Quote:
the ported TB doesn't require a tune as it's only function is to help with air flow velocity. by porting the outer edges, there is a smoother transition from the CAI tube to the TB itself. it also creates more of a venturi effect which helps increase the rate at which the plenum can refill after you smash the peddle...hence why it improves throttle response. the spacer (25mm) does a couple things. there is more science behind this but increasing the runner length shifts the TQ band to the left. it also isolates the air passing through the intake manifold from the engine heat (cooler air = denser air = more oxygen = more power). a basic tune will cover mods that increase air intake volume (like a CAI) and adjust fuel trims to meet those requirements. i could be wrong, but i don't believe there is much to tune for on the exhaust side. generally, headers are tuned to produce optimum power for the motor within a certain RPM range. primary diameter and length, and then collector length. ex: longer collector is beneficial for mid range TQ. the more advanced tuning changes timing, AFR's, fuel tables, fuel injector pulse, etc... but at what point do you sacrifice daily drive ability with maximum HP or dumping $$$$ to build out the motor? ...sorry, off topic. there are a lot of things that can be done to increase HP...but once you start reaching the limitations of the motor itself (assuming you aren't physically changing the internal dimensions of the motor) the mods that you add have a very limited addition to the final HP output. EX: MOD's claimed HP gain: CAI = 15 LT Headers = 30 Insulator = 20 -------------------- total HP gain = 65 (WRONG!) BBK LT headers claim a 33 HP. but that gain is at 5500 RPM (max HP 255-stock, 273-headers) max gain is really only 18HP Injen CAI claim a gain of ??? not sure but its around 15HP. independent testing showed 17max...but in what RPM range is that gain? -what if they both share the same RPM range for their claimed gain? even with a gain of 18HP from headers and 17HP from CAI, your overall HP gain will not be 35HP. it will be a mash up of the two and hopefully net you something close to 22-25HP overall IF your lucky. not every mod adds HP, some just improve functionality and driveability to suit your needs. others do add HP and work together as a collective to improve overall output, but their output is more of an average vs a total of the sum. not trying to insult your intelligence, just trying to explain how some things work and why.
__________________
Last edited by hapisok; 05-23-2012 at 11:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#510 |
|
Engineer in Training
Drives: IBM 2010 Camaro LS Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Alabama
Posts: 292
|
Oh no you don't second page. You will not hide this one from me.
__________________
K&N Aircharger CAI, BBK LT's, VMAX black ICE, Trifecta tuned
|
|
|
|
|
|
#511 | |
![]() Drives: LLT Machine Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: VIC/AUS
Posts: 563
|
Quote:
but very informative. Did you get my email about the gnumeric read problem? Send that log over to me as requested when you get the chance. I miss going over my logs lol.TEAM MACE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#512 |
![]() Drives: LLT Machine Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: VIC/AUS
Posts: 563
|
Got some results back from an LY7 we did, with gains of around 50rwhp, with clearly much more room for improvement with the tune! Still waiting on an revised tune based on logs now :(
The way it looks is that these engines are simply begging for a cam upgrade FI seems a little overrated now LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
#513 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 04 Silverado Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Floriduh!
Posts: 1,113
|
The afr defintely needs to come down
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#514 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 LS Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: FL
Posts: 1,643
|
Big gains but would like to see real life camaro numbers. I am sure they are coming so I will be more excited then.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#515 | |
![]() |
Quote:
lol. LY7 is just like the LLT though right? What's the hold up im getting ancy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#516 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,967
|
So what is the stock HP rating for the LY7 engines? I thought it was like 260 or something like that?
Either way, those look to be like some huge gains there....wow. I can't wait until we finally get to see the very first cammed and tuned Camaro V6.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
|
|
|
|
|
#517 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 1LT "Chakita". 04 Yota Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 823
|
+1 on cams: and when I thought I was getting to the end of the bolt on list, LOL. Cams, heads, plenum spacer, intake manifold, fuel pump, etc.
I'm thinking we should start a "400NA" group....
__________________
Hi, my name is Chakita. I have cams!!!!
Build thread: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?p=3847083 |
|
|
|
|
|
#518 |
|
[COTW 4/13/15]
Drives: Supercharged LLT Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Automobile Reviews 2011 Chevrolet Camaro Convertible 2SS | Tran | Camaro Convertible Forum | 33 | 07-28-2011 08:36 PM |
| Installation Camaro Needed for Manual for a Justice Install Package in SF Bay Area | Info@PeddersUSA.com | USA - California | 6 | 04-30-2010 09:02 PM |
| GM memo to dealers | Moose | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 41 | 02-04-2010 08:33 PM |
| Ambient lighting (ABL) - the FINAL update = LIMITED TO DOOR PANELS | CamaroScotty | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 338 | 04-15-2009 06:33 PM |