![]() |
|
|
#547 | |
![]() Drives: 08 CTS Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
The fact that GT500 corners poorly and has loads of understeer cannot be easily fixed. The ZL1 is far more neutral - which is more desireable for a track car. I'm getting the impression that you have never driven on a track. Handling is always preferred over raw power on the track. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#548 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Car Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Place
Posts: 3,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#549 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 ZL1 - #670 Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Seminole, Fl.
Posts: 8,009
|
Quote:
They don't and they refuse to understand that fact. They all believe in one and done is the best.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#550 | |
|
CamaroFans.com
|
Quote:
This thread is about the 2013 GT500 vs. ZL1... correct. So there's no need to dig up the same old quotes posted all over the SVT forums about stuff said in 2011. It's totally out of context and irrelevant at this point. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#551 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,044
|
Quote:
Yes the camaro will be easier to do it in, and might get better results but both cars are track ready, just depends on how you like your car. Im not saying either car is better than the other I would love either one in my driveway. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#552 | |
|
7 year Cancer Survivor!
Drives: 17 Cruze RS, 07 G6 GT, 99 Astro Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 21,546
|
Quote:
__________________
Cancer's a bitch! Enjoy life while you can! LIVE, LOVE, DRIVE...
The Bird is the word! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#553 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2005 STi corn fed Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,997
|
Really, you couldn't be more obtuse? I'm not going to search through a thousand pages of nonsense in the merged threads to find what you and I both know exist. I doubt anyone ever explicitly stated the gt500 would never be faster on any lap on any road course, but we both know how many many hundreds of times it has been stated the gt500 would not be able to keep up on a road course because it, "won't be able to put the power down" or, "more power isn't going to make it faster on track," etc. Like I said, a few months ago people were even saying it wouldn't be able to match the Boss on the road course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#554 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,044
|
No, I am a ford fan and I have no problem admitting the ZL1 would be the better track car for most people. What I have a problem with is a lot of people here still say the GT500 is not track ready, its a one trick pony, and is only good for 1/4 blasts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#555 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Vette Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#556 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,044
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#557 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,044
|
Quote:
Ok going by that logic then, didn't one of the first head 2 heads say the Camaro had trouble with the 2-3 shift? so then bc one magazine reported it all ZL1s must have problems with the 2-3 shift right |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#558 |
![]() Drives: Camaro 1SS/RS Black Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 140
|
Everyone that is complaining about price difference doesn't understand economics. Most of it has to do with where parts are being produced and the cost of it to be shipped to the manufacturing destination. Ultimately these cars are worthy of comparing head to head. Fom everything my eyes tell me is the gt500 is not what they claim it to be. ZL1 clearly is a consistent performer and to me that screams being bulletproof from mechanical failure. gt500 seems like it was slapped together with duck tape and glue. So to me ZL1 is the ideal choice
|
|
|
|
|
|
#559 |
|
7 year Cancer Survivor!
Drives: 17 Cruze RS, 07 G6 GT, 99 Astro Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 21,546
|
LOL how about a head to head race say 50 laps at road Atlanta against a bone stock GT500.To me that would prove more than 3 laps to which car is most Track Ready.
Any real racing series you would have to add the required safety equipment to either car. But come on now you know what they really mean when they say a car is Track Ready.
__________________
Cancer's a bitch! Enjoy life while you can! LIVE, LOVE, DRIVE...
The Bird is the word! |
|
|
|
|
|
#560 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Vette Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 572
|
Nobody would "seriously" race either of these cars without the basic safety and brake upgrades - mainly pads, fluid, and perhaps lines. On BOTH cars. At that point...anybodies ball game, I think. Though the GT500 driver will no doubt have to work harder, and may indeed be less consistent.
Anyway, you said full race....I'm sure there are some out there that think they can buy a ZL1 and go run a Trans Am series type of race tomorrow, when in reality, most that actually take these cars to the track will run 20-30 minute sessions and compete against............the clock. Not other cars. And you and I both know we can't just go to Road Atlanta and race each other. Ain't happenin! I will agree that base car to base car, the ZL1 is the more track ready. Assuming we're talking a track with corners....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|