![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Are You For This Technology For Spying On Drivers? | |||
| Yes (Save Lives) |
|
44 | 38.60% |
| No ( At Your Own Risk) |
|
70 | 61.40% |
| Voters: 114. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#71 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 2SS/RS Convertible Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: SoCal Baby...
Posts: 2,530
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/31545004/Text...ng_and_Driving http://www.straighttalklaw.com/blog/...ury-lawyer.php http://roundupdaily.com/news/article...9bb30f31a.html http://blog.allstate.com/texting-whi...drunk-driving/ http://www.textinganddrivingsafety.c...ng-and-Driving want me to link more articles? There have been a LOT of tests and studies done on this, and yes TEXTING is worse that driving drunk.
__________________
I'm only responsible for what I say, not for what you fail to understand.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#72 | |
![]() Drives: 2023 Radiant Red 2LT Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 283
|
Quote:
My favorite was when I was on a ride along with my dad who drove a semi. This guy was weaving all over the freeway, when we got closer, I could see in the car. He was being "serviced" by a female, had a phone in one hand and his other on her head, never could figure out how he managed to keep himself out of the ditch or from hitting someone else. You can't police stupid, but I wish the cops had some way to at least try. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Autoboticus Roboticus
|
People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both.
What the hell ever happened to something called "PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY" ?
__________________
Last edited by GEEKFREEKSCOTTY; 10-19-2012 at 05:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 2LT 45th anniversary Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 754
|
Quote:
That article says exactly what i said in my first line. Regardless of how stupid people are, and not looking at the road, i would still argue that not having any idea that you are in a vehicle driving it is much worse than not looking at the road for a few seconds in any driving situation. The level of BAC certainly comes into affect here but I am talking about being impaired by alcohol to the point of not knowing where you are and what you're doing. This happened to be the case for the 2 people i know and also my uncle who was cut in half by a guy diving a truck who later admitted that he didn't know he was in a car driving due to his .35 BAC at the time of the accident. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 5.7L Tundra Double-Cab X-SP Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 2,031
|
Officer: "I saw you texting"
Guy: "I'm sorry sir but I was playing Angry Birds" Officer: "My apologies sir, have a great day" Where is the logic in this? If you ban texting you should ban all 'hand' use of a phone period. |
|
|
|
|
|
#76 |
|
Autoboticus Roboticus
|
I'm really sad that almost 1/2 of the people that responded to the poll are more than happy to give away their privacy rights and are willing to propagate a "big brother" government model because they are delusional into thinking it will protect them.
It's scary to realize how prophetic George Orwell's book "1984" and the movie "Idiocracy" has actually become.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 |
![]() |
What if someone hit another car because he/she is trying to peep into the car around you looking for people texting?
__________________
Life is twisted... Everyone should have a sport car...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT RS Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Long Island
Posts: 1,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
Some people don't use common sense. Always a stimpulation or excuse involved in a worst case senario.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
![]() Drives: '11 Camaro RS 2LT Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Kingwood,TX
Posts: 666
|
If you are involved in an accident where someone is injured or killed they(police) will look at your cell phone records to see if you were using it at the time of the accident. If the media would make it more public about people that are sent to jail for manslaughter(10-15 yrs) not to mention the stigma of knowing you were responsible for killing or taking the life of someone I think the general public would start to police itself. It to me is not made public about the people that end up in jail for texting and or talking on the phone for unintentional manslaughter and their life's and the other families life's are ruined. We already have laws for DUI and some still do it. If it was made public as to the end result of some of these drivers it may hit home more to a larger population. I could be wrong but letting people know what happens to the ones who break the law would help a lot in my view. Sorry for my soap box statement, I am done.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Within 18 months in the are where i live , there were three cases of drivers that killed pedestrians and bicycles while the drivers were TEXTING . In the first case, a 19 years old girl, college student killed a NINE years old girl crossing the crosswalk with her mother and broke the mothers leg . In the second one, a young male driver 17/18 cut some little girl life at 12 .In this case the authorities/ lawyers are also swing this kid girlfriend because she knew that he was driving at the time of the accident , and she was the one on record from the service provider [ phone company ] Last case i know about , is this freaking punk 17 years old driving a 3 Tones SUV on Sunday morning , texting , and speeding at 15 m over posted speed [45] , and killed a 9 years old girl ,and her father on their bicycles in the bicycles lanes , and IN FRONT OF THE MOTHER AND BROTHER eyes So for those that say it's all BS , WHICH one of this drivers YOU WANT TO BE ? The last one t |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Kingsland, GA
Posts: 92
|
those of us that oppose the question asked by the OP are not saying that texting and driving is not a problem. it is. i agree there are horror stories involved with any illegal action (ie.- drinking/texting and driving, speeding, robbery.. etc.). and i only assume that most agree that it is something that needs to be addressed. but if we keep on giving up our rights/privacy, eventually we will not have any. if we did put video cameras in our cars or have cops spying on us, you will lose any privacy you had to begin with and i GUARANTEE you that there will still be horror stories of innocent people killed/injured. so we will still be in the same situation but with more gov't control. whats the next step? more laws and more gov't control.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
B.O.D. 02/16/10
Drives: 2010 SGM Sp. Edition 2017 RS Conver Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Albia,Iowa
Posts: 3,959
|
Car industry needs to catch up with technology and have talk to text integrated. This is a problem that will not go away on it's own. We also need better synch with car computor to use as evidense if someone was on the phone at time of accident and stiffen the fines so that it lessens the problem. Right now everone tries to keep the phone down below the door and text which is worse than when it was up where you could keep somwhat of an eye on the road as you texted. JMO
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|