![]() |
|
|
#1149 |
![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro LS Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Hagerstown, Maryland
Posts: 279
|
__________________
2011 Camaro LS M6
13.972 @ 103.44mph w/ 2.215 60' |
|
|
|
|
|
#1150 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 IOM Camaro Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,446
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1151 |
|
HT5 EastSide
|
they probably added all the bolt ons we have now lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1152 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 IOM Camaro Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,446
|
Or it's an April Fools joke...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1153 |
![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro LS Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Hagerstown, Maryland
Posts: 279
|
That's what i thought at first.. But idk.
__________________
2011 Camaro LS M6
13.972 @ 103.44mph w/ 2.215 60' |
|
|
|
|
|
#1154 |
|
HT5 EastSide
|
its realistic to me...I mean mine is at around 350 at this point and I dont even have the lfx
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1155 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 IOM Camaro Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,446
|
It's on so many different websites, it's kinda hard to think its a joke. But something just doesn't seem right.
What throws me off is the slower 0-60 time. With that much power, I'd expect faster. Unless they changed the gearing like they did in the rear-end of the 2LS (which would explain the lower 0-60 time and the bump in mpg). |
|
|
|
|
|
#1156 | |
![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro LS Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Hagerstown, Maryland
Posts: 279
|
Quote:
Very true.. i don't know what to believe anymore
__________________
2011 Camaro LS M6
13.972 @ 103.44mph w/ 2.215 60' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1157 |
|
HT5 EastSide
|
I think they gave a false 0-60 time so that ford doesnt know. hehehe
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1158 |
![]() Drives: Ly7 Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: bezza
Posts: 253
|
Anyone on here keen to be an Admin for GM V6 owners chat??? Really need a Camaro Admin, preferably someone who knows a lot on the LLT and would be pretty active in posting, helping out etc.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/GMSIXCYL/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#1159 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Really Slow Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 57,198
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1160 |
![]() |
![]() 354 hp!? Well, looks like it's time for headers and a ported IM. lol That's awesome, but 354 translates to around 280 rwhp, which seems to be a magical barrier on the N/A LLT save for a few of us. What is your secret GM?
__________________
El gato. Mods: Eagle eye headlights, 18" Axis Sport graphite, Roto-Fab cold air intake, Vmax ported TB, 3/8" Vmax Black-Ice, RX single valve catch can, RX breather, Pedders inserts, Trifecta tune, BBK LTH 304 SS.
art/ärt/Noun. Definition: 5th generation Camaro. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1161 |
|
[COTW 4/13/15]
Drives: Supercharged LLT Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,957
|
354?...Read in the 2014 changes that Scott said they would have 323hp....
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1162 | ||
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Not even going to lie. If this is a rumor and isn't true I'll be happy. I feel like I worked hard to get to maybe 275 rwhp/343hp (haven't dynoed but that's what Tracy guessed it would be at). I'll admit it, I'm mad bro. lol.
__________________
El gato. Mods: Eagle eye headlights, 18" Axis Sport graphite, Roto-Fab cold air intake, Vmax ported TB, 3/8" Vmax Black-Ice, RX single valve catch can, RX breather, Pedders inserts, Trifecta tune, BBK LTH 304 SS.
art/ärt/Noun. Definition: 5th generation Camaro. |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|