Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-16-2014, 09:35 PM   #29
62nalide


 
62nalide's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 SS
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyg36 View Post
I'm pretty sure the NF has proven itself more than capable at putting down great numbers.
Links please!

Show me what NA record they have broken? Show me what cam only record they've broken? Then I'll take back what I said. Peak dyno #s don't win races.
62nalide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2014, 09:39 PM   #30
62nalide


 
62nalide's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 SS
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,102
So things and opinions don't get taken the wrong way I go by track times since I only drag race. If that cam works for you thats great what matters to you is that you amd only you like it. I base my opinion on track #'s.
62nalide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2014, 10:22 PM   #31
mikeyg36


 
Drives: 2015 Z/28 #533
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 6,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by 62nalide View Post
Links please!

Show me what NA record they have broken? Show me what cam only record they've broken? Then I'll take back what I said. Peak dyno #s don't win races.
Where in my post did I say records or races? Even if I did that is even more imprecise as dyno numbers since you would need the same driver on the same day on the same track in the same conditions etc. The most important mod is the driver mod. While the VVT cams may be better in certain situations, that does not make the NF bad or a poor choice for the OP.
mikeyg36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2014, 10:37 PM   #32
62nalide


 
62nalide's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 SS
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyg36 View Post
I'm pretty sure the NF has proven itself more than capable at putting down great numbers.
I see your point and respect it. Buuuuuut going by this post I would like to know what has this cam proven? Thats why I asked for links.
62nalide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2014, 10:45 PM   #33
mikeyg36


 
Drives: 2015 Z/28 #533
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 6,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by 62nalide View Post
I see your point and respect it. Buuuuuut going by this post I would like to know what has this cam proven? Thats why I asked for links.
Its proven that it can perform well. If it didn't perform well people wouldn't buy it; and people are buying it. Times and dyno numbers:

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=314347

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=261683
mikeyg36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2014, 10:52 PM   #34
62nalide


 
62nalide's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 SS
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyg36 View Post
Its proven that it can perform well. If it didn't perform well people wouldn't buy it; and people are buying it. Times and dyno numbers:

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=314347

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=261683
Thanks for the links. Now maybe I'm just a picky guy lol but I saw a bunch of low 12s and high 11s. I understand why and the reason the times were not so quick. I admit its one of the nicest sounding cams out there but not impressed with the times. Camarojt ran a 11.91 @ 101* weather this pass summer with a stock cam. Maybe we need a good driver to make this cam shine? Idk I'll stop picking at this and still stand by my personal opinion.
62nalide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2014, 11:09 PM   #35
BLACK10


 
BLACK10's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 CAMARO. 10.04@133mph, 1.4 60'
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Posts: 4,585
Hi guys,

VVT and LS3 are just two different and great ways to bring your Camaro to life!

We are well versed in both applications and will support a customer in either route they choose.

OP, thanks for contacting us and we hope we can help you meet your power goals
BLACK10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2014, 08:57 PM   #36
Rabamaro
 
Drives: 2010 ABM SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Prairieville, LA
Posts: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by 62nalide View Post
Thanks for the links. Now maybe I'm just a picky guy lol but I saw a bunch of low 12s and high 11s. I understand why and the reason the times were not so quick. I admit its one of the nicest sounding cams out there but not impressed with the times. Camarojt ran a 11.91 @ 101* weather this pass summer with a stock cam. Maybe we need a good driver to make this cam shine? Idk I'll stop picking at this and still stand by my personal opinion.
ET gives the best estimate of HP correct? I dyno'd 498/470 at lethal on a cool evening, had my IM ported and then dyno'd again 5 months later on a warm afternoon (80-85 degrees) and made 474/441 on a different dyno. My best ET to date was 119.6 with a horrible 2.3 60ft. I'm 250 lbs and have 75 lbs of speakers in my trunk. Where does that put me? I feel like with a better launch and without bogging, that I could hit 120.
__________________
Vararam Tune CAI, Vararam Power Wedge, 160 degree stat, VMax ported throttle body, Ceramic coated ARH 1 7/8" LTs with X-pipe, Borla S-Type Axle back, MGW short throw, 3.91s, Ported stock IM, BTR Stage IV cam, Heritage Grille, Backup camera, UMI Performance trailing arms and toe rods, dyno tune
Rabamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2014, 09:01 PM   #37
62nalide


 
62nalide's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 SS
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rabamaro View Post
ET gives the best estimate of HP correct? I dyno'd 498/470 at lethal on a cool evening, had my IM ported and then dyno'd again 5 months later on a warm afternoon (80-85 degrees) and made 474/441 on a different dyno. My best ET to date was 119.6 with a horrible 2.3 60ft. I'm 250 lbs and have 75 lbs of speakers in my trunk. Where does that put me? I feel like with a better launch and without bogging, that I could hit 120.
Bench racing are we?
If you like great I'm sure its a great cam! Glad you love it bud thats all that matters!
62nalide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2014, 09:07 PM   #38
Rhino79


 
Rhino79's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS L99/Auto
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 2,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rabamaro View Post
ET gives the best estimate of HP correct? I dyno'd 498/470 at lethal on a cool evening, had my IM ported and then dyno'd again 5 months later on a warm afternoon (80-85 degrees) and made 474/441 on a different dyno. My best ET to date was 119.6 with a horrible 2.3 60ft. I'm 250 lbs and have 75 lbs of speakers in my trunk. Where does that put me? I feel like with a better launch and without bogging, that I could hit 120.

At full weight, with my wife in the car with me, on the stock 20's with Pirellis launching in 2nd gear, I trapped 97.xx in the 1/8th at 50x rwhp in 2000 da. 97 in the 1/8 for me is about 123-124 in the 1/4.
Rhino79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2014, 09:12 PM   #39
Rabamaro
 
Drives: 2010 ABM SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Prairieville, LA
Posts: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by 62nalide View Post
Bench racing are we?
If you like great I'm sure its a great cam! Glad you love it bud thats all that matters!
Oh I wasn't trying to be a smartass! I was legitimately wondering what kind of power my car is actually making. I wasn't expected such a big difference between the two dynos.
__________________
Vararam Tune CAI, Vararam Power Wedge, 160 degree stat, VMax ported throttle body, Ceramic coated ARH 1 7/8" LTs with X-pipe, Borla S-Type Axle back, MGW short throw, 3.91s, Ported stock IM, BTR Stage IV cam, Heritage Grille, Backup camera, UMI Performance trailing arms and toe rods, dyno tune
Rabamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2014, 09:13 PM   #40
Rabamaro
 
Drives: 2010 ABM SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Prairieville, LA
Posts: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhino79 View Post
At full weight, with my wife in the car with me, on the stock 20's with Pirellis launching in 2nd gear, I trapped 97.xx in the 1/8th at 50x rwhp in 2000 da. 97 in the 1/8 for me is about 123-124 in the 1/4.
Wow. That's awesome.
__________________
Vararam Tune CAI, Vararam Power Wedge, 160 degree stat, VMax ported throttle body, Ceramic coated ARH 1 7/8" LTs with X-pipe, Borla S-Type Axle back, MGW short throw, 3.91s, Ported stock IM, BTR Stage IV cam, Heritage Grille, Backup camera, UMI Performance trailing arms and toe rods, dyno tune
Rabamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2014, 09:14 PM   #41
Rhino79


 
Rhino79's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS L99/Auto
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 2,827
What was your 1/8 mph?
Rhino79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2014, 10:11 PM   #42
62nalide


 
62nalide's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 SS
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rabamaro View Post
Oh I wasn't trying to be a smartass! I was legitimately wondering what kind of power my car is actually making. I wasn't expected such a big difference between the two dynos.
My bad, people have been flaming me on the NF comments lol thought it was another shot at me.
62nalide is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.