![]() |
|
|
#57 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
They mark them up like this becaus some dumb shit will pay that price so why not?
Just wait a month or two and save 20 grand. Some people.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
![]() Drives: 2012 GT500 SVTPP Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fort Lewis, WA
Posts: 448
|
Though I'd share.
__________________
Past rides:
2002 BMW M3 2010 Camaro V6 2010 Camaro SS L99 2011 Camaro SS Ls3 2011 Dodge Charger R/T 2012 Dodge Charger SRT8 Super Bee/ Reso Delete Current ride: 2012 GT500/ 2.3 TVS, Afco Dual pass heat exchanger, Roush Extreme Exhaust: 606 rwhp/ 611 wtq |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Challenger Hellcat, 2018 ZL1LE Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 3,003
|
That's gotta be a joke. There's no way that any reasonable person consciously did that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,685
|
To this day, my local $417 hole puke greedy dealer still has a $5000 markup on all new camaro's v6, or v8, more on ZL1, and up... Greedy @$$hole dealers are the reason the manufacturers are @$$ up these days. Makes me sick. I have to drive 3-4 hours from here to pay MSRP, on a stock car no one cares about. Ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,045
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
just found out the dealership right down the road here is selling them at sticker. Zero markup at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | |
![]() Drives: car Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 305
|
Quote:
So, it either is true and they got caught and changed their minds or it was just a joke. https://autos.yahoo.com/news/lies-no...171243650.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 80 Cutlass 403, 2010 FF RT Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 921
|
The build quality and reliability of the Camaro and Challenger would be very comparable, both made in Canada and both plants are up to date. Cost for Challenger and Camaro is almost the same, unless you are paying a market adjustment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
![]() Drives: 2012 L99 2SS/RS Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Orlando
Posts: 206
|
Quote:
Kind of like the B-17 vs the B-24, everyone knows the B-17 and it gets all the Hollywood fame & glory because it was a good looking plane and the B-24 looked like a flying dump truck. The truth was the B-24 was more advanced had a greater bomb load and there were twice as many B-24's in service. B-24's accounted for the majority of enemy ground targets destroyed by American heavy bombers. Vought took a more radical approach with the Corsair as a result the aircraft took a while to come into it's own where by contrast the F6F hit the ground running. The Corsair had issues becoming carrier qualified and was only land based till later in the war. It killed a lot of pilots till the kinks of operating it off a carrier were worked out. You can thank the Brits for that as they were the first to figure it out. In the end it went on to become a great aircraft but it wasn't successful from the drop like the Hellcat. I just think Hellcat is a cool name, LOL these automakers name cars after everything form weapons to fish anyway. Ford made a car in the U.K. called the Corsair, it was hideous, definitely not anything like the plane, see below :O http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Corsair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | |
![]() Drives: 2012 L99 2SS/RS Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Orlando
Posts: 206
|
Quote:
That damn car was was named after a British warship, Americas first true sports car and it was named after a ship??? And not even a American one??? Don't believe me they have a model of the ship in the Bowling Green Corvette museum LOL. Love the Vett but come on a performance car has more in common with a fighter aircraft than a huge freaking ship
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|