Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


View Poll Results: WIll gas prices affect your decision to purchase a Camaro
No, I am happy with 27 mpg 136 77.27%
Maybe, it depends on where gas prices are at its release 35 19.89%
Definitely, I have already looked to get a more fuel efficient car 2 1.14%
Maybe so now, the Volt looks nice! 3 1.70%
Voters: 176. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-22-2008, 09:11 PM   #113
Jason@JacFab
 
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
Send a message via AIM to Jason@JacFab Send a message via MSN to Jason@JacFab
It really doesn't matter to me. (Hopefully) after a few months I won't drive it everyday, and will keep my 94 for a DD. I don't even look at the gas prices because you gotta have it either way, I just say how many dollars of gas I want, and I'm never shocked to see that it cost 80+ dollars to fill a tank.

In my book, anything that gets 18+mpg city is good... Heck, my 94 z28 pulls down almost 22 consistently in the city, believe it or not, I know what it gets.
Jason@JacFab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2008, 09:24 PM   #114
nonsensez9
 
Drives: 05 mustang gt
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: bc, canada
Posts: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by theholycow View Post
Apparently when AFM switches on and off, it is a little jerky, and they depend on the automatic's torque converter to absorb that so the driver doesn't feel it.
shucks. I guess a 6 speed manual will be good enough.
nonsensez9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2008, 09:55 PM   #115
michele.lee
 
michele.lee's Avatar
 
Drives: 2000 Camaro and 1992 Blazer
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Fort Mill SC
Posts: 24
27 MPG!!! Can't wait!

Wow! the new camaros will get 27mpg - can't wait - my 2000 gets like 18 and my old Blazer gets 12. so i guess i'll save a lot of gas $ cruising around in my 2010!
michele.lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 07:33 AM   #116
theholycow


 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Drives: '02 GMC Sierra, '80 Lesabre
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: RI
Posts: 1,804
You won't save any gas. The savings you get from having better MPG will be a wash against the gas you spend because you can't resist cruising in your new Camaro!
__________________
Removing weight has surprisingly little effect on fuel economy
Engine break-in procedure | Gear ratios
2002 GMC Sierra 4x4 5.3 (190,000 miles and going strong)
1980 Buick Lesabre family heirloom with 36,000 miles
2008 Volkswagen Rabbit 2 door I5-2.5 5spd DD lease
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSpike23 View Post
she really underestimates the damage i would do to her reproductive organs
http://allOffTopic.com is the place for all the naughty stuff you can't get away with on this forum...
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 07:42 AM   #117
michele.lee
 
michele.lee's Avatar
 
Drives: 2000 Camaro and 1992 Blazer
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Fort Mill SC
Posts: 24
YES! I am looking forward to putting MANY joyous miles on that car! I don't care how much the gas is - I'll still look cooler than my budget-crunching Prius-driving neighbors - bet I'll be happier too!
michele.lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 09:55 AM   #118
darthknight72
 
darthknight72's Avatar
 
Drives: 1983 trans am
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 127
We might as well enjoy this muscle car era while it lasts.I think in the near future most performance cars will be supercharger or turbo 4 bangers and v-6's.i hope im wrong but with everyone having to get over 30 MPG,its going to be hard to reach that number with V-8's in the lineup.Lets hope technology catches up,so we can keep our performance V-8's.
darthknight72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 10:46 AM   #119
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,372
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by darthknight72 View Post
We might as well enjoy this muscle car era while it lasts.I think in the near future most performance cars will be supercharger or turbo 4 bangers and v-6's.i hope im wrong but with everyone having to get over 30 MPG,its going to be hard to reach that number with V-8's in the lineup.Lets hope technology catches up,so we can keep our performance V-8's.
I'm not so sure. With the recent advances in engines plus some weight reduction, it should be possible to have a Camaro crack 30 mpg highway, with a V8. Add to that the fact that GM's total V8 sales in cars are probably under 100k (with the Camaro added in). That is a drop in the bucket compared to their total sales. In effect, it becomes more important for them to make cobalts that average 36 mpg than getting Camaro's to average 26.

Now, that being said, cars like the current impalla ss will likely lose their V8. But for many that want a V8 performance car, there simply is no substitute. Therefore, there will always be a market for such cars, though it might be very small.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 11:41 AM   #120
theholycow


 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Drives: '02 GMC Sierra, '80 Lesabre
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: RI
Posts: 1,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
I'm not so sure. With the recent advances in engines plus some weight reduction
Good luck on weight reduction. Weight (for the average car, in general) hit bottom in the early to mid 1990s, and has been going up ever since. It looks like around 1973 the Camaro was at its previous highest weight; google reports ~3600 pounds for 1973, which also seems to be the minimum guess people have for the new Camaro.
__________________
Removing weight has surprisingly little effect on fuel economy
Engine break-in procedure | Gear ratios
2002 GMC Sierra 4x4 5.3 (190,000 miles and going strong)
1980 Buick Lesabre family heirloom with 36,000 miles
2008 Volkswagen Rabbit 2 door I5-2.5 5spd DD lease
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSpike23 View Post
she really underestimates the damage i would do to her reproductive organs
http://allOffTopic.com is the place for all the naughty stuff you can't get away with on this forum...
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 11:55 AM   #121
shank0668


 
shank0668's Avatar
 
Drives: '14 LML/'06 LJ/'76 Trans Am
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,438
ok when you read this post you dont think about socks right? so when i think about camaro i dont think of gas milage.
shank0668 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 11:57 AM   #122
Design1stCode2nd
 
Drives: four wheels
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: usa
Posts: 585
I think the industry as a whole will be looking to weight savings materials. Once there is an increased demand for carbon fiber there will be more of an incentive to have more plants making it along with better and cheaper ways to make it.

You'll see alot more Direct Injection, Turbo chargers and even hybrid sports cars but most of them will be for Asian manufacturers, at least initially (Honda CRZ, Toyota FHTS of whatever it was called). I think V-8's will still be offered in Mustangs and Camaro's as there will always be a core group who will buy those although it may shrink.
Design1stCode2nd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 01:23 PM   #123
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 31,876
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
Quote:
Originally Posted by shank0668 View Post
ok when you read this post you dont think about socks right? so when i think about camaro i dont think of gas milage.
hmm. Lots of people would disagree. No, fuel economy isn't the FIRST deciding factor. Becuase if it was, they certainly wouldn't be looking at a Camaro. But between the three cars (Challenger, Mustang, Camaro), buyers will compare the fuel economy of the cars. And Camaro will win that comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
I'm not so sure. With the recent advances in engines plus some weight reduction, it should be possible to have a Camaro crack 30 mpg highway, with a V8.
Definitely.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
Now, that being said, cars like the current impalla ss will likely lose their V8.
I think you're 100% correct.
__________________
"Keep the faith." - Fbodfather
Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Detroit News panel wants GM to build Camaro concept Tran 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 12 03-15-2009 04:38 PM
MT: Challenger and Camaro face a case of bad timing Scotsman General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 16 06-03-2008 01:45 PM
First Decline in Summer Gas Consumption Since 1991 GTAHVIT General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 10 04-22-2008 10:58 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.