![]() |
|
|
#15 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 ZL1 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,052
|
In the SS's, the motors are slightly different depending on your transmission choice. The manual has the ls3 engine, the auto has the l99. Because only the l99 has displacement on demand, the power is slightly lower. I think the camshaft is slightly smaller as well.
The ZL1 motors are all the same regardless which transmission you get. The losses to the rear wheels are due to the additional drag of the auto transmissions.
__________________
'17 ZL1 10.99@129 stock. 4225# raceweight. Best 60'- 1.66 on factory tires. 10.48@132 E50, intake and tune. 4270 lbs
https://youtu.be/EyHtdH9XOkY https://youtu.be/Lcu41obbTf8 '13 ZL1 BRM A6. 11.591 @ 119.2 factory stock with a 1.68 60'! Best stock mph 121.8. 11.29 @ 123 RotoFab, drag radials and skinnies. 4360# raceweight. http://youtu.be/yggIA3C_kkA 2014... back to stock http://youtu.be/spQLaTWbThs 2013... stock & RotoFab |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 ZL1 A6 #7860 Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: CO, USA
Posts: 1,279
|
The responses in this thread are
![]() The rated HP from GM is the SAME for both the Auto and Manual ZL1. They both us the same LSA motor (unlike the SS which uses slightly different V8's and thus have different GM rated HP). The "rated" GM HP is at the crank and does not include losses die to accessories and drivetrain. A manual transmission has a Direct connection from the engine to the wheels while an Automatic transmission (traditional auto anyway) has a torque converter. A torque converter is a Fluid Connection from the engine to the wheels and thus will always loose some power in the transfer from mechanical to fluid to mechanical again (heat). Autos dyno a little less than Manuals do because of this power loss into heat. But the Auto and Manual have different gearing in all gears and in the final drive. This results in different acceleration and shift points in the 1/4 mile. Also a torque converter by design multiplies the torque the engine makes, something a clutch does not do. Personally i picked the ZL1 because it has an Auto option and it makes ALL difference at the drag strip which is what I bought it for. Im sure a Manual is more fun to drive on the street and the road course. Cant go wrong with either choice IMO! |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
![]() Drives: ZL1 Gone but not Forgotten! Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Central NY
Posts: 465
|
Quote:
Except the fact that the manual is not more fun to drive. I had a manual Z before my current auto Z and I consider myself an excellent manual driver. I have way more fun in my auto then I did with the manual. When you start Modding these autos there just plain sick. Straight beasts. They shift just like a manual with a good tune without doing the work, win win! But to the O.P. your question is easily answered. Auto is always going to shift faster then any human. It's a computer, simple as that. That and all the good stuff 2013ZL1#7860 wrote about above.. Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
![]() Drives: 2013 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: St. Petersburg FL
Posts: 143
|
Quote:
With autos you may have what we refer to as the "torque bomb" where it may want to step out hard going 1,2 or 2,3. Mine is a little twitchy, but it makes more torque than hp like an old engine instead of more hp than torque (like it started out). I think that happened after the Pfadt headers. Some of the old Buick GSX Stage 1 guys said flat out there would be no way they could get that 455 out of the hole with a 4 speed manual unless they were on slicks. Of course they had bias ply tires too, that's a whole different nightmare. The electricity in the brain and computer move at the same speed, it's the foot, arm and gear syncros where it slows down. That and every time you hit the rev limiter or undershift and leave revs on the table, it is technically a mistake the computer won't make. In fact in last years Lightning Lap at V.I.R. they said what cost the Viper the few tenths is that the revs went down every time it shifted, and it lost ground. No way to avoid that as long as there is disengagement and re-engagement. Besides I have two tunes. One is aggressive, the other with get rubber going into 5th gear. I COULD shift it that hard I don't have a need to.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE, 1969 Nova SS 396 Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 790
|
All depends on the drivers, I know some people with automatics that just smash the gas and go up in smoke. I had a 2012 SS auto and it was alright, drove my friends manual 2013 SS and was in Love. Then bought a 2015 ZL1 manual and its awesome.
From a dig I mean the ZL1 manual trans is equip with launch control, but I think I can launch better my self. In the end of the day its a very small difference, get what you like better. I will say manual trans is Americas best anti theft device!
__________________
![]() 18 ZL1 1LE|M6|Nav|PDR|CF Hood|CF WING|CF Dash|Tow Hook| |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
![]() Drives: 2012 CTS V,2000 Firehawk, SRT Ram Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Bakersfield, Ca.
Posts: 92
|
Quote:
Automatic ..................................... Manual Gear ratio x rear end= overall ratio ....Gear ratio x rear end= overall ratio 1st ..4.03 x 3.23= 13.02....................1st...2.66 x 3.73 = 9.92 2nd..2.36 x 3.23= 7.62.....................2nd...1.78x 3.73 = 6.64 3rd..1.53 x 3.23= 4.94.....................3rd...1.30x 3.73 = 4.85 4th..1.15 x 3.23= 3.71......................4th.. 1.00x 3.73 = 3.73 So you can see the automatic has a big advantage in 1st, slightly better in 2nd, very slight in 3rd and about even in 4th. That first and second gear edge is enough to win 1/4 mile races (given equal HP and traction). Less driver error too. That said, I only drive a manual, for the fun and I have driven manuals (and raced them) since 1964....back in those days a stick shift had a huge advantage. Also I am currently in a rebuild of my CTS V 6-speed manual to even things out. RPM rebuild will include a change to 3.01 1st, 2.10 2nd and a 1.46 3rd....I think I will have a real surprise in the mid-range for my fellow automatic CTS V brothers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
![]() Drives: 2017 ZL1, A10, White, sunroof, nav Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Garner, NC
Posts: 720
|
Quote:
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 ZL1 Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: tangent or
Posts: 2,985
|
I really think the gearing in the auto works better in the 1/4 mile. Look at the mustang people who swap away from the Mt-82 to a tremec and lose that 4.0 first gear they usually lose ET and have to swap rear gear to get it back or add more power not to need it.
I have always felt though launching an automatic allows you to sneak up on that traction threshold a bit easier than a manual as well. back in the PG, th350, th400 days though you had to shift automatics manualy to be competitive. in the computer controlled world though you don't.
__________________
2016 2SS
2020 super duty on 37's |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
![]() Drives: 2015 ZL1 Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SF East Bay Area
Posts: 129
|
Quote:
The reason the auto SS has the L99 with cylinder deactivation is because it allows it to eek out 1 more MPG verses the LS3 engine with an auto. An LS3 engine with an auto would push the Camaro SS into gas guzzler territory and force a gas guzzler charge on the sticker. GM was rightly concerned they'd get crushed by Ford if the auto Camaro SS had an additional gas guzzler charge that the Mustang did not. Thus, auto Camaro SSs gets the L99 engine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
KaBoom1701
Drives: 13' ZL1 Red M6 Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: I.E. SoCal (Yucaipa)
Posts: 8,631
|
Yes....computers can out shift us now....
Go take a drive in a 8spd auto stingray Z06 and you'll see what I mean.
__________________
Mods:
Roto-Fab Intake, WW Res. kit & Big Gulp Air Scoop, Elite Catch Can, ATI Super Damper & 18% OD Pulley, LF Idler pulley bracket, Metco CC breather, ID850 Injectors, Stainless Power Headers w/ ceramic coating, TR71X Spark Plugs, JMS Fuel Pump Booster, Bo White TB, Tuned by Ted @ Jannetty Racing, Ron Davis HX, D3 Reservoir, Pfadt 1" Springs, Moreno Camber Plates, ZL1 Addons Splitter guard washers, Tow Hook kit & rock guards, Hurst Shifter Billet Plus 6 Speed Short Shifter, ZL1 DRL lighting harness, ZL1 Recaro Seats. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Cartoon Maus
Drives: White ZL1, Chevroyota Prizolla Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 303
|
I thought it was because the A6 wasn't carrying around the extra fun of an M6, so without the extra weight of joy, it is able to get up there a bit faster.
![]() j/k. What they ^^^ said. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 1SS LS3 Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 814
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 ZL1 A6 #7860 Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: CO, USA
Posts: 1,279
|
Then why does the 2010 LS3 with hydraulic power steering have the same rating as the 2015 LS3 with electric power steering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 1SS LS3 Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 814
|
Probably because the power difference is small and therefore within the typical variance that occurs between engines coming off the line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|