Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Vararam
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Technical Camaro Topics > Camaro Issues / Problems | Warranty Discussions | TSB and Recalls


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-15-2016, 12:16 PM   #407
terry_b

 
terry_b's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 2SS/RS 1LE
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Hudson, MA
Posts: 1,390
Send a message via MSN to terry_b
But where does that sort of mentality lead? Warranty will be denied unless I service the car at the dealership each and every time? Only GM manufactured replacement parts and fluids+air/oil filters purchased at a dealer?

They've already reduced their coverage period, on a less proven engine/powertrain no less. What does that say about long term ownership of the 6th gen? Especially considering the known issues specific to direct injection.

Hell, at this point, why not just drop $10k off the MSRP and start including a checkbox for warranty coverage? Sell it like an additional option and include a binding contract regarding modification. Win-win - the people who mod right away and don't care about the warranty anyway get into the car cheaper, and those of us who depend on the car for transportation get the peace of mind we need.

I love my car... my brand loyalty, however, is a bit shaken at this point. I sincerely doubt if I will move onto 6th gen.
__________________
terry_b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 02:20 PM   #408
Superman09
Account SNAFU
 
Superman09's Avatar
 
Drives: 13 Tahoe 79 Scout II 15 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 1,356
Final resolution from GM

I have heard a final resolution from GM.
However, first I want to say a huge thank you to everyone in here, I was simply hoping to air my story and see what happened. I never dreamed it would turn into what it did. The idea of a petition never crossed my mind, and I am very grateful for Mr Stacy and the things he did for me in this. I am grateful for everyone who signed the petition, and those that didn’t sign, but offered words of encouragement or advice, and the ones who sent me PM’s to encourage me. As anyone can imagine this whole situation felt like a kick in the nuts, and everyone here has really helped me pull through it.

GM’s final verdict is that my entire powertrain warranty will remain blocked, and they will not fix my car. The catch can may or may not have been the causes of the failure, but according to the owner’s manual any modification can void your warranty. I knew going in to this, like everyone, else that what I was doing could void the warranty, but I listened to the stories online of “I have X, Y, and Z mods and I got warrantied”. I took a calculated risk that adding the catch can would not void my warranty, and I was wrong.

Now before everyone goes and blames GM on this please understand something. I also greatly believe that your relationship with your dealer, as well as the knowledge of the dealer plays a HUGE part in what does and/or doesn’t get covered. Like several have mentioned I had my car taken to a GMC Cadillac dealer who may not have had much experience with the Camaro and the LS3. That lack of experience and knowledge about the car may have led them to believe my car was more modified than it was. Your experience may vary at your dealership. Your dealer may have more knowledge, and may know you better, and may cover your car with a catch can and a cold air intake. However GM’s stance is that modifications void your warranty, and I understand and agree with that.

GM will not be fixing my car, and I understand and agree with them on why they won’t. If they fix mine because I only have a cold air intake and a catch can, where does it end? What about the guy who only has intake and shorty headers but no tune? What about the guy who has only this or only that? Where do they draw the line? GM drew the line at NO modifications, and that is ok with me.

Now again before ya’ll rush off to sell your cars or burn them down or picket GM, please understand something else. I did not take what I was told by GM to be if you have fuzzy dice on your mirror your warranty is done or if you have different tires, or used none GM fluids. I took it to mean that if you added modifications to the vehicle. If you added something that was not originally there or significantly altered your vehicle with none OE equivalent parts then you were voiding you warranty. I took it as so long as the parts used were OE or OE equivalent replacements you would be ok, and that makes sense to me, and I agree with it.

Could I continue to fight this and take it all to court? Sure. However I don’t have the money, time, or energy to go to court over this. I need my car up and running, and can afford to do so, so I will be fixing my car myself. I greatly appreciate everyone who donated money to the GO FUND ME (you should be getting a refund) but I don’t want to fight this in court.

On a positive note, now that my warranty is done, I am free to mod to my hearts (or atleast my wallet’s) content. Again THANK YOU to everyone who has supported me in this, I cannot express how helpful all of this was for me. And please don’t let this shake your faith in GM, they are a company that got put in an awkward situation and had a choice to make, and made the one that protected them, and I do not blame them at all. GM still makes a great product, and I will probably continue to be a customer in the future.
Superman09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 02:28 PM   #409
BlueStreakHouTX
 
BlueStreakHouTX's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS RS IOM
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Spring Texas
Posts: 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Superman09 View Post
I have heard a final resolution from GM.
However, first I want to say a huge thank you to everyone in here, I was simply hoping to air my story and see what happened. I never dreamed it would turn into what it did. The idea of a petition never crossed my mind, and I am very grateful for Mr Stacy and the things he did for me in this. I am grateful for everyone who signed the petition, and those that didn’t sign, but offered words of encouragement or advice, and the ones who sent me PM’s to encourage me. As anyone can imagine this whole situation felt like a kick in the nuts, and everyone here has really helped me pull through it.

GM’s final verdict is that my entire powertrain warranty will remain blocked, and they will not fix my car. The catch can may or may not have been the causes of the failure, but according to the owner’s manual any modification can void your warranty. I knew going in to this, like everyone, else that what I was doing could void the warranty, but I listened to the stories online of “I have X, Y, and Z mods and I got warrantied”. I took a calculated risk that adding the catch can would not void my warranty, and I was wrong.

Now before everyone goes and blames GM on this please understand something. I also greatly believe that your relationship with your dealer, as well as the knowledge of the dealer plays a HUGE part in what does and/or doesn’t get covered. Like several have mentioned I had my car taken to a GMC Cadillac dealer who may not have had much experience with the Camaro and the LS3. That lack of experience and knowledge about the car may have led them to believe my car was more modified than it was. Your experience may vary at your dealership. Your dealer may have more knowledge, and may know you better, and may cover your car with a catch can and a cold air intake. However GM’s stance is that modifications void your warranty, and I understand and agree with that.

GM will not be fixing my car, and I understand and agree with them on why they won’t. If they fix mine because I only have a cold air intake and a catch can, where does it end? What about the guy who only has intake and shorty headers but no tune? What about the guy who has only this or only that? Where do they draw the line? GM drew the line at NO modifications, and that is ok with me.

Now again before ya’ll rush off to sell your cars or burn them down or picket GM, please understand something else. I did not take what I was told by GM to be if you have fuzzy dice on your mirror your warranty is done or if you have different tires, or used none GM fluids. I took it to mean that if you added modifications to the vehicle. If you added something that was not originally there or significantly altered your vehicle with none OE equivalent parts then you were voiding you warranty. I took it as so long as the parts used were OE or OE equivalent replacements you would be ok, and that makes sense to me, and I agree with it.

Could I continue to fight this and take it all to court? Sure. However I don’t have the money, time, or energy to go to court over this. I need my car up and running, and can afford to do so, so I will be fixing my car myself. I greatly appreciate everyone who donated money to the GO FUND ME (you should be getting a refund) but I don’t want to fight this in court.

On a positive note, now that my warranty is done, I am free to mod to my hearts (or atleast my wallet’s) content. Again THANK YOU to everyone who has supported me in this, I cannot express how helpful all of this was for me. And please don’t let this shake your faith in GM, they are a company that got put in an awkward situation and had a choice to make, and made the one that protected them, and I do not blame them at all. GM still makes a great product, and I will probably continue to be a customer in the future.
You sir, are a class act... thank you for sharing all this with us, and I understand... I hate that youre having to go thru this, (and I know I couldn't be as understanding as you are if it would have happened to ME), but good luck with this!!!!!!
BlueStreakHouTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 02:32 PM   #410
Welker2
Ret AF, cancer survivor
 
Welker2's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro 2SS/RS & 2006 Corvette
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Mesquite, NV
Posts: 2,741
Thank you for the update. Sorry they will not be honoring your warranty, but your experience has educated and may help others. Good luck with your repairs and hopefully you be back on the road again shortly.
__________________
Welker2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 02:58 PM   #411
DILLIGAF
 
DILLIGAF's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 ZL1 M6 Rapid Blue
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Western NY
Posts: 357
I've been in your shoes and agree. It sucks but it's what we have to deal with when nodding our cars. In my case it was a downpipe and a tune (on a Cadillac ats). Good luck with the new build.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
__________________
2023 Rapid Blue ZL1 M6
| Corsa NPP | Corsa Carbon Fiber Intake | Hardwired Valentine1 Gen 2 | Pro Clip Phone Mount |
DILLIGAF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 03:03 PM   #412
BlueStreakHouTX
 
BlueStreakHouTX's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS RS IOM
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Spring Texas
Posts: 230
GM has spoken, we have heard. loud and clear I'll post pictures of my new GT 350 when it arrives instead of the new 2017 ZL1 I was planning on buying.
BlueStreakHouTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 03:08 PM   #413
qcman

 
qcman's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro 2SS RDP Tuned L99
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Ottawa, Canada eh?
Posts: 1,889
Magnuson Moss be damned! If I was a forum sponsor I would be worried about this...
qcman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 03:15 PM   #414
DILLIGAF
 
DILLIGAF's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 ZL1 M6 Rapid Blue
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Western NY
Posts: 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueStreakHouTX View Post
GM has spoken, we have heard. loud and clear I'll post pictures of my new GT 350 when it arrives instead of the new 2017 ZL1 I was planning on buying.
You don't think ford would do the same thing to a modded gt350?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
__________________
2023 Rapid Blue ZL1 M6
| Corsa NPP | Corsa Carbon Fiber Intake | Hardwired Valentine1 Gen 2 | Pro Clip Phone Mount |
DILLIGAF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 03:16 PM   #415
Chevy Fanatic
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS IOM/PEARL STRIPES-6M
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueStreakHouTX View Post
GM has spoken, we have heard. loud and clear I'll post pictures of my new GT 350 when it arrives
I agree with this. As I mentioned in an earlier post I have purchased 12 new GM vehicles over the last 20 years. I currently own a 2012 Cadillac CTS, a 2011 Camaro SS, and a 2015 Impala LTZ, all fully optioned cars. I have made my last GM purchase. I will not sit back and watch this nonsense unfold that blames a oil pump failure on a unrelated component. GM will not ever see another dime from me because of this.
__________________
Whipple S/C, 3.750 pulley, JRE rough idle blower cam kit, Trunion upgrade, C5R timing chain, LS2 chain dampner, Melling 10296, Dynatech 1 7/8 LT headers, OR pipes, Dual valve RX catch can, ID 850 Injectors, LPE Dual fuel pump, CAI with Apex scoop, VMax ported T/B, ADM Tune 675 RWHP 560 TQ
Chevy Fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 03:18 PM   #416
motorhead


 
Drives: Love the one you're with
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Downtown Charlie Brown
Posts: 11,849
Im sorry, but you are getting railed. Where is the proof that the catch can caused the pump failure? If GM would show that proof then I'm sure most of us would be satisfied with their decision to block your warranty. Blocking the entire powertrain is nuts too. So a catch can can now cause a rearend failure or transmission failure? Like I said in my last post "F" them. I'm done giving them money. They don't give a rat's winky about the folks that buy their junk. So why would anyone support them. Hell, read the 6th gen fourm. It's riddled with people with paint issues that have to fight tooth and nail to be made whole. There wasn't any mods on their cars. Keep upping your prices, lower your quality and say "F" the customer when they have an issue ,and you'll be back crying to congress to get you butts bailed out again. My only hope is that they say no this time.

Sorry to everyone, but I'm just sick of large companies taking advantage of people. They sell products based on quality and great warranties and then hide behind all the find print in that worthless piece of paper when a problem comes up.

Its not just GM. Its many large companies.
motorhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 03:19 PM   #417
BlueStreakHouTX
 
BlueStreakHouTX's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS RS IOM
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Spring Texas
Posts: 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by DILLIGAF View Post
You don't think ford would do the same thing to a modded gt350?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
I'm so glad you asked... probably, depending upon the mods.... but as far as I know, I dont have to worry about when the Ford engine is going to hand grenade due to a known issue with a defective oil pump?

Last edited by BlueStreakHouTX; 05-15-2016 at 03:37 PM.
BlueStreakHouTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 03:24 PM   #418
SlingShot


 
SlingShot's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 ZL1 - #670
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Seminole, Fl.
Posts: 8,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chevy Fanatic View Post
Is anyone else as confused as I am on the outcome of this issue? I have read a couple posts by those heavily involved in this and it appears they are saying GM is correct in their position of no warranty for the oil pump failure, its over and the OP has a paperweight in his driveway?

Taken straight off of the FTC website "The FTC says the manufacturer or dealer must show that the aftermarket or recycled part caused the need for repairs before denying warranty coverage"

In this case was the OP shown the connection to a known oil pump failure / problem and how his catch can directly contributed to the failure? What am I missing here?
Your interpretation is not correct. The FTC is talking about OE replacement parts, and NOT modifications. You modify your car, and you are on your own if anything breaks. When it comes to laws, there is more than just the words, there is also the intent.
__________________
SlingShot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 03:26 PM   #419
maddoggyusa

 
maddoggyusa's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro Dusk 2SS/6
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,586
OP that's ok... I understand your position. But I'd be really PO'd the dealership did more harm to your car driving it. Sounded like all it needed was an oil pump... and now who knows??? Anything beyond an oil pump I'd say is that dealer's fault.
maddoggyusa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 03:43 PM   #420
PDXSSCE
Yee-aay-ee!
 
PDXSSCE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 2SS/RS CV CE
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: ORegon
Posts: 2,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by qcman View Post
Magnuson Moss be damned! If I was a forum sponsor I would be worried about this...
Sales of catch-cans are sure to take a hit now that it's a proven fact that GM can & will void a whole powertrain warranty due to one being installed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by motorhead View Post
Im sorry, but you are getting railed. Where is the proof that the catch can caused the pump failure? If GM would show that proof then I'm sure most of us would be satisfied with their decision to block your warranty. Blocking the entire powertrain is nuts too. So a catch can can now cause a rearend failure or transmission failure? Like I said in my last post "F" them. I'm done giving them money. They don't give a rat's winky about the folks that buy their junk. So why would anyone support them. Hell, read the 6th gen fourm. It's riddled with people with paint issues that have to fight tooth and nail to be made whole. There wasn't any mods on their cars. Keep upping your prices, lower your quality and say "F" the customer when they have an issue ,and you'll be back crying to congress to get you butts bailed out again. My only hope is that they say no this time.
I know this won't be popular, but I'm more disappointed in the OP than GM. If GM's warranty position was so easily accepted, to the extent of coming to their defense, then it was pointless to post the issue in the forum.
Seeing that they've won, GM will be more emboldened to deny warranties for frivolous reasons.
__________________
PDXSSCE is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.