Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Roto-Fab
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-28-2017, 11:52 PM   #15
SquawkVFR
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bo White View Post
I gained nothing on the dyno with my cutouts open.
Me neither. But it sounds so bad ass I don’t care. LOL
SquawkVFR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 02:45 AM   #16
BradoSanz
 
BradoSanz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 modded Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: South Texas
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by STALKER View Post
I would love for this to be true (getting that much from straight pipes), but unfortunately I just don't think this is even close to possible. Sounds like the Vette might have pooped the bed on your recent run. In any event though, knocking off a C7 with a Gen 5 is nothing to shake a stick at....the weight difference alone kills us. Good win.
Hey there Stalker, I apologize for not replying sooner, life has kept me busy. The C7 is auto, and we raced from 45 on a great road surface so there was no wheelspin involved. It was definitely something that shocked me, so I am currently investing in a dash mount to record runs like these - videos don't lie

Best,

Brado
BradoSanz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 02:46 AM   #17
BradoSanz
 
BradoSanz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 modded Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: South Texas
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outlaw77 View Post
You mean straight pipes that replace the rear mufflers?
Yes. The car was tuned for straight pipes but the dealer had reinstalled factory mufflers "because it was too loud." After putting them back on, I gained a LOT of hp. It was interesting to see.
BradoSanz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 02:49 AM   #18
BradoSanz
 
BradoSanz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 modded Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: South Texas
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hixson View Post
I think people say that replacing the stock catback with a straight piped aftermarket catback can be expected to gain something 5-10 HP (10 being generous).

To get the 35-40 HP youre talking about you would need to do something like headers and a tune. I would guess that straight pipes and a tune could be good for something like 20? I'm just guessing but I thought a lot of the HP gain of Headers + tune came from the headers.

Is it possible you smoked this vette this time because hes driving a manual and just stinks on that run?
Hey there! Yes, I have full-bolt on with an aggressive cam and a custom 93 octane tune. The car was originally tuned with straight pipes but, as mentioned in one of my previous replies, the dealer I purchased the car from had replaced them with a factory exhaust because it was "too loud." Maybe a better explanation is not that I so much gained HP with straight pipes as I had lost hp with the factory exhaust reinstalled.
BradoSanz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 02:50 AM   #19
BradoSanz
 
BradoSanz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 modded Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: South Texas
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by christianchevell View Post
You may have removed some restriction from what ever your old set up was but not so much a gain in power as one pull compared to one other proves little....
It was significant enough that I came here to post about it lol. The way he pulled me before straight pipes was how I pulled him after straight pipes were reinstalled. With full-bolt ons, the aggressive cam, longtube headers and the tune this car has, the power to be gained from the higher exhaust flow was significant.
BradoSanz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 02:55 AM   #20
BradoSanz
 
BradoSanz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 modded Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: South Texas
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by InFiD3ViL View Post
I wish he would elaborate on what he means by 'straight pipe'.

When someone says that, I tend to think of long tube headers, without cats, and NO H/X pipe. A true dual setup.
While I am confident I have longtube headers and ported heads, I am not sure whether I have cats or not, to be honest. While, yes, the car is significantly louder with straight pipes, the only way I'd know for sure is to either inspect myself or find the previous owner. In fact, I am still trying to find the previous owner to know exactly what was done to the engine because I should not be pulling a C7 the way I did. I'll take video and do some more runs in Mexico once my dash mount comes in so I can show everyone.
BradoSanz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 03:01 AM   #21
BradoSanz
 
BradoSanz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 modded Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: South Texas
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerTM View Post
Well, without a dyno to prove your point it's still just anecdotal. I certainly would love to see a simple straight pipe gain that much, but it's just not possible. I wouldn't have put a cam in if it was that easy for so much power.

Edit, what is your definition of "straight pipe"? Long tube headers without cats or muffler? Stock manifold with no cats? Stock manifold, cats, no mufflers?
My apologies, I also have an aggressive cam, longtubes and ported heads in addition to a full bolt-on setup with a custom 93 octane tune. The car was originally tuned with straight pipes involved in the equation but the dealer had them removed due to volume issues. Maybe it is not so much power I had gained from straight pipes as I had lost from having the stock exhaust. Either way, the difference was significant. The car actually felt slower but more consistent in acceleration due to the way the power band changed with straight pipes installed (before, the car felt a lot more "aggressive" above 5000RPMs), so I know that the gains were significant if I felt seat-of-the-pants slower but pulled a C7 below 100 the way I was able to; when previously he was able to walk all over me with my stock exhaust. My brother has been racing and doing PCA events for two decades and is the most consistent driver I know, so he is an excellent partner to compare cars with.
BradoSanz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 04:06 AM   #22
BradoSanz
 
BradoSanz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 modded Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: South Texas
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by SquawkVFR View Post
Maybe it sounded like it had more horsepower.
I am not one to be influenced by sound. Instead, I observe the feel of the car (it was wildly different dynamic at full throttle once the straight pipes were installed) and compared acceleration differences. The car felt like a different vehicle with the straight pipes on, and was easier to drive at full throttle due to what was most likely a power curve change as a result of the nature of straight pipes. The fact that I pulled him when before he would walk me on every run we did was too significant to write off as anything else than power gain.
BradoSanz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 04:09 AM   #23
BradoSanz
 
BradoSanz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 modded Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: South Texas
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by pyroguy View Post
They say 100 pounds off a car is good for a 0.1 of a second shaved off of your quarter mile E.T. Have you ever weighed the suitcase mufflers? They're way heavier than a muffler setup should be. What you may be experiencing is the loss of 50+ pounds of weight off of your car with the combined volume increase thus making it seem as though your car gained "30-40 hp".
While it was definitely about 45-50lbs of weight loss, that by itself would not be anywhere near enough to PULL a 2015 automatic C7 Stingray below 100, when before straight pipes I would get walked every time and it was CLEAR that the C7 was faster. The only difference that changed between our runs was straight pipe installation. The car WAS tuned with straight pipes involved, but I purchased it from the dealer with stock exhaust due to volume issues as I mentioned in previous replies. Even my brother was impressed but not surprised - when the dealer mentioned they had to remove the straight pipes due to volume issues, he suspected I was losing a lot of HP.
BradoSanz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 04:11 AM   #24
BradoSanz
 
BradoSanz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 modded Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: South Texas
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by rontammy0 View Post
You will gain zero from a catback or a muffler delete mod.
The results from these runs say otherwise, friend. With full bolt-ons, aggressive cam, longtubes and ported heads plus a custom 93 tune that involved straight pipes in the equation, my car stood to gain significant HP by removing the stock exhaust and putting the straight pipes back on.
BradoSanz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 04:31 AM   #25
JerTM

 
JerTM's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS M6
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,940
You could verify what you felt with dyno testing, I would be interested to see exactly what is going on.
JerTM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 06:00 AM   #26
BradoSanz
 
BradoSanz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 modded Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: South Texas
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerTM View Post
You could verify what you felt with dyno testing, I would be interested to see exactly what is going on.
I most definitely agree!
BradoSanz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 06:51 AM   #27
Bo White


 
Bo White's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Summit White 2SS 1LE
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vance Alabama
Posts: 8,091
Quote:
Originally Posted by SquawkVFR View Post
Me neither. But it sounds so bad ass I don’t care. LOL
Now I didnt say "......so I took them off."
Lol
__________________
Retired wanna be cylinder head porter
2015 2SS 1LE Clutch reservoir, Vararam DRX, ported TB, TSP 2" headers, MGW shifter, stage 4 cam and Wilkes 11° 65cc heads
Totalled:
2010 1SS Wilkes Performance/Eagle 416 shortblock, TSP custom valvetrain, PRC 260 heads, Edelbrock Pro Flo 102, th400 swap, 8" PTC 5500 stall= 535/435 at the wheels tuned Gen 3 Performance and Dyno 10.97 @ 124 full weight in 3100 DA CamaroFest X
Bo White is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 09:25 AM   #28
rontammy0
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/ RS INFERNO ORANGE L99
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Alliston Ontario Canada
Posts: 9,057
Ò
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradoSanz View Post
The results from these runs say otherwise, friend. With full bolt-ons, aggressive cam, longtubes and ported heads plus a custom 93 tune that involved straight pipes in the equation, my car stood to gain significant HP by removing the stock exhaust and putting the straight pipes back on.
I think whats happened here is that the stock exhaust was somewhere blocked off a bit or plugged up somewhere you cant see it. So once you changed the exhaust it frees up the air flow better for the cam and headers to work properly. You fixed the problem by changing out the exhaust....you went straight pipes but in reality any catback would do. So maybe you gained changing out a bad exhaust for one that wasnt. At least your beating vettes.

Last edited by rontammy0; 11-29-2017 at 09:44 AM.
rontammy0 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
sound mod, straight pipes, tuned


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.