![]() |
|
|
#15 |
![]() Drives: 2LT Black '10 Camaro, 2000 Durango Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: CT
Posts: 373
|
lol you guys are funny
87 octane. that is what the engine takes. you're just wasting your money otherwise. i was skeptical but even the guys at chevy confirmed it. "oh i swear it feels faster" please. it's all mental. it's like when people drink a buncha beers and start acting all drunk, until somebody informs them it was non-alcoholic. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Former Camaro Owner
Drives: 2011 Dodge Charger R/T Join Date: May 2010
Location: Carrollton, TX
Posts: 604
|
Haha..."placebo effect", is the clinical term. I'll stick with 87, I'm sure the placebo effect is worth it but I'll save some $$$.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 2SS, SW Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 1,079
|
Heh. My car does run better with premium...
One Example: On an uphill grade, under light acceleration, low-octane fuel causes surging. Premium eliminates that. The bad thing is that it did nothing for my quarter time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
![]() Drives: Z Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 14
|
Quote:
![]() it is a waste to use higher than 87. It is all a mental thing like he said. Like how you feel after you wash your car or put a nice coat of wax on it, or after an oil change. Somehow it feels faster. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If you use 89 oct...and 1/2 92 octane...it will equal out to approx 1/2 lets say 90..for agruments sake...so you can mix and match.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() Drives: 2011 CTS CPE & 2010 2LT/RS CGM Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nevada
Posts: 337
|
If you use a single nozzle dispenser the middle grade is mixed in the dispenser. 50% high octane and 50% low octane. So mixing it in your tank is immaterial.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Red Brick of Vengeance!
Drives: 12 Second Brick Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
|
This subject has been beaten to death...
The ECU in the LLT is "over-sparked" and relies on the knock sensors to pull the timing back. This is very obvious in my data logs. With 87 octane the knock sensors are VERY ACTIVE! Check the video and watch the bottom right corner which is "Spark Retard" from the knock sensors: When I run 93 octane the knock sensor are almost totally inactive! Spark Retard is almost constantly 0! So with 93 octane I'm running more timing which mean more power... And in fact we had one guy here with a shop that actually tested this on his dyno and showed that higher octane did make more power... The ECU basically adapts to the higher octane by constantly trying to add more timing until the knock sensors kick in... at this point either you believe it or you don't... I've seen the data logs...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Blowin the doors off!
Drives: A 2013 SS RS 6M SR Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,390
|
Faster no. Smoother yes. your engine will perform better with higher octane every time. performance encompasses more than just HP...
__________________
2G1FS1EWXD9163847 |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() Drives: Z Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 14
|
and it will be beaten to death some more. Just the nature of forums....one side believes one thing, the other side believes another, the middle side gets a dashhawk. I had one of those things on my EVO when I still had it....trapped at 12.66 but the hawk said 11.33 or something like that. Bunch of my Honda lovin friends loved it though. Saved them thousands on expensive mods they didnt need. The hawk drops your time in an instant.
But it is good for monitoring stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
SoCal Camaro5 Race Team
Drives: 2021 Shadow Grey Camaro 2SS 1LE Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SO CAL
Posts: 14,367
|
Don't know about making car faster but I used 91 awhile back when I had the Airaid V1 which leaned the car and is said to pull timing from the leaning out, and basically ran worse then stock. The 91 gave it more throttle response and smoother, guess helped restore some of the lost timing from the Airaid. Now with the car broken in and the mods I have I have switched back and forth to see if noticable and really can't tell, maybe just a bit smoother. The biggest change came when I changed brands of 91,I was using Shell near my house but switched to a Chevron further away and that was noticable! I guess that particular Shell just had worse quality gas is all, and cost more too! Next time I will try the 87 from Chevron to see if any different and will report in. one thing I have noticed as well is that I have less soot in the tail pipes from the Chevron which is good.
Performance wise the car runs great. Today with the second tank of Chevron in we went to the beach for our walk and there is a section of PCH we make a u turn on to get to where we park. The road is a 60 zone, so as I make the turn, slow to a stop and in sport mode stand on it through 73 before letting off the gas, only place I can even do that. What I noticed for the first time is 1-2 shift was a bit firmer and 2-3 shift was nice and firm, more then usual as if there was a shift kit in! felt great! Car hits about 63 then shifts to 3rd and 73 comes up really fast. I don't know if it was the gas or cooler, damp air or both but the car seems to like it. Will see if it continues after the 87 goes in. FYI there are dyno runs from a shop in VA who tested the 87 vs 93 in hot weather I think in Aug, and the car made more low to mid range power and some on top to on the 2nd, cooler run. Might check it out for whait it's worth. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: May 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 756
|
You're all wasting your money... GM engineers did not design your car for 91,93 etc...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Red Brick of Vengeance!
Drives: 12 Second Brick Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
|
Quote:
Looking back through my data logs at WOT with 87 octane the car would lock in at about 22 to 24 degrees of timing... with 93 octane the car is locking in with about 29 degrees of timing! And as blackbee mentioned there was those dyno test, which I can't seem to find I've seen the data logs... I've seen the dyno sheet... I've talked to the GM engineers... I know 93 makes a difference...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '12 Toyota Tacoma Dbl Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 1,275
|
I run 93 in the car a majority of the time, and as Scrming has stated, along with several others higher octane and this car are made for each other! I, myself, know this almost better than most people. With my mods my spk rtd was so high along with my timing. I was losing almost 30hp with 87oct. Gained it back with the 93 + timing adjustments. People can believe what they want, it's your personal vehicle do to it as you wish. Tell me how I go from a 14.5sec 1/4mi w/ 87 to a 14.04 w/ 93? The 14.5 was an even better DA than the 93!
__________________
STANDING 1/4MI: 13.948@99.87 6600RPM HP/TQ Gains - 30.54HP/24.3TQ (NOT PEAK) |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
![]() Drives: 11 IBM 1LTRS, '89 Firebird Formula Join Date: May 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 177
|
Starting Page 8-43 in the owners manual:
Fuel Use of the recommended fuel is an important part of the proper maintenance of this vehicle. To help keep the engine clean and maintain optimum vehicle performance, we recommend the use of gasoline advertised as TOP TIER Detergent Gasoline. Look for the TOP TIER label on the fuel pump to ensure gasoline meets enhanced detergency standards developed by auto companies. A list of marketers providing TOP TIER Detergent Gasoline can be found at www.toptiergas.com. Driving and Operating 8-43 The 8th digit of the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) shows the code letter or number that identifies the vehicle’s engine. The VIN is at the top left of the instrument panel. See Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) on page 11-1. Recommended Fuel If the vehicle has the 3.6L V6 engine (VIN Code V), use regular unleaded gasoline with a posted octane rating of 87 or higher. If the octane rating is less than 87, you might notice an audible knocking noise when you drive, commonly referred to as spark knock. If this occurs, use a gasoline rated at 87 octane or higher as soon as possible. If you are using gasoline rated at 87 octane or higher and you hear heavy knocking, the engine needs service. If the vehicle has the 6.2L V8 engine (VIN Code W) or the 6.2L V8 engine (VIN Code J), use premium unleaded gasoline with a posted octane rating of 91 or higher. For best performance, use premium unleaded gasoline with a posted octane rating of 93. You can also use regular unleaded gasoline rated at 87 octane or higher, but the vehicle’s acceleration could be slightly reduced, and you might notice a slight audible knocking noise, commonly referred to as a spark knock. If the octane is less than 87, you might notice a heavy knocking noise when you drive. If this occurs, use a gasoline rated at 87 octane or higher as soon as possible. Otherwise, you could damage the engine. If you are using gasoline rated at 87 octane or higher and you hear heavy knocking, the engine needs service. Gasoline Specifications At a minimum, gasoline should meet ASTM specification D 4814 in the United States or CAN/CGSB-3.5 or 3.511 in Canada. Some gasolines contain an octane-enhancing additive called methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MMT). We recommend against the use of gasolines containing MMT. See Fuel Additives on page 8-45 for additional information.
__________________
1100 - 7/19 - Preliminary order accepted
2000 - 7/21 - Order accepted by GM 2500 - 7/28 - Order preferenced 3000 - 7/28 - Order accepted by production control 3400 - 8/09 - Order broadcast 3800 - 8/17 - Order produced 9/02 - DELIVERED! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| My experience with V6 gas mileage, I'm impressed. | Medic726 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 40 | 07-17-2011 07:08 AM |
| Camaro V6 Gas Mileage - As good as Rated? | cb4dude | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 16 | 07-14-2010 02:48 PM |
| V6 Gas Questions | Markal | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 25 | 06-28-2010 03:49 PM |
| Has anyone super or turbo charged V6? | cstproductions | Forced Induction - V6 | 19 | 08-17-2009 09:51 AM |
| gas prices. | Congoman775 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 65 | 05-28-2008 01:20 PM |