![]() |
|
|
#15 |
|
Whipplecharged
Drives: 1956 Chevy 3100 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 44
|
I know this is not a Camaro but since we are on the topic of LS7, here is a dyno sheet of a stock 10 LS7 Vette with our 2.9L kit (same as Camaro kit with shorter drive for Vette belt line) we just released. 7psi, 86* and 10% humidity after it had been running on and off all day developing the base calibration.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 camaro Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: port st lucie ,florida
Posts: 4,273
|
great #,s mike, wish i ahd 10% humidity..lol... just wanted to say thanks for everyone,s help..mike@ whipple contacted me and is stepping up and helping me with this...just thought everyone should note that mike was on the ball and in less then 24 hrs resolved my issues...but i will be back with new questions..lol.. 2 months b4 we tackle my build and want to try have all answers to things that will arrise...with a 427lsx/4l80 swapout
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Whipplecharged
Drives: 1956 Chevy 3100 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 44
|
Should be a KICK A$$ build and I can't wait to see what she does. Thanks Mike for the rec and Thats what I am here for (not too often but I am here).
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Whipplecharged
Drives: 1956 Chevy 3100 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 44
|
Always a pleasure Mike. Got you covered.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Drives: 2007 Trailblazer SS Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Palm City, FL
Posts: 232
|
I can't wait to put it together!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 camaro Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: port st lucie ,florida
Posts: 4,273
|
well , if you ever get the 4th gen out of mothballs...have to make sure you see my tailights..
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Maggie blown LS3 vette Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SE TX
Posts: 1,490
|
Just curious here.....why not peddle the LS7 heads and port your LS3 heads? Are the LS7 heads that much better than ported LS3's? No offence meant, but those adaptors look rather Rube Goldberg(ish). Seems like that's adding another level of complexity. Is it worth it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | ||
|
Whipplecharged
Drives: 1956 Chevy 3100 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 44
|
Quote:
Quote:
Also, no offence taken. Just throwing out a cheaper alternative.
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 camaro Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: port st lucie ,florida
Posts: 4,273
|
there actually 6 bolt lsx 7heads, so for the 1100 to 1200hp, clamping power may be a bonus..also the 2.20" titanium intake and 1.61" sodium-filled exhaust valves compared to ls3 -2.165 hollow stem intake valve & 1.59 solid stem exhaust..i,m sure there is more...maybe the fact they say lsx7 and match the lsx block..it would take a lot more to match these heads then a port job...GM LSX-LS7 heads
GMPP LS7X 6 Bolt Heads 19201806 - Titanium Intake Valves - Upgraged with Inconel Exhaust Valves - Upgraded with Comp 26925 Springs - Upgraded with Comp Retainers - Upgraded with Comp Spring Seats - Upgraded with Comp Locks - Port Cleanup - ARP Head Studs - GM LS7 Rocker Studs - GM LS7 Rockers - GMPP LSX Chrome Valve Covers 19171500 i may not of been clear...i am using the lsx7 heads on a 427lsx.
__________________
Last edited by mikepage0007; 09-29-2011 at 08:46 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 camaro Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: port st lucie ,florida
Posts: 4,273
|
theres always adaptors for most anything, and looking at you "engine porn", you would never see those 3/16 adaptors...and your engine is nice and clean...as mike said, you would have to look for them to even notice...mike offered the swap to the ls7 manifold and sc today , ..but after consideration, i thought it was unecesssary...besides , that could lead to more problems ...this is simple,effective and does not alter any other parts...it is a tried and proven part...that has no downside other then 3/16 space between head and intake..so kudo,s for mike@whipple finding this +practical/efeective ..fix..try to put a edelbrock on a lsx7 head, and you think they have a adaptor...or gonna come on camaro5 and find you a 100% fix in 24 hrs...i don,t think so...i,m betting the maggie guys are using the same fix, from what i have heard..
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: Anything Blown Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Whipplecharged
Drives: 1956 Chevy 3100 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 44
|
Neither do we.
This is merely a low cost suggestion for the guys who already have a PD blower kit for the otherwise stock motor and are now building and swapping to LS7 heads. This way, they do not have the extra expense of purchasing a new manifold or a new supercharger assembly.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Bayoucitymusclecars.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 camaro Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: port st lucie ,florida
Posts: 4,273
|
never meant to imply you did, just stating that others who have maggies that have went to a lsx7 head have adapted to there maggie instead of buying a new 5k ls7 maggie kit.....which is what mike was stating...this is a ls3 whipple being adapted to fit a lsx 7 head without changing to entire new supercharger ..
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|