Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-01-2009, 12:08 PM   #15
chris@borla
 
Drives: 02 True Blue
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: California
Posts: 106
The shorties do not need to be tuned for.
chris@borla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2009, 03:57 PM   #16
g-townmach
I FARTED
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: cen-tex
Posts: 870
How easy did the shorties go in?? Doing install myself soon.
__________________
g-townmach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2009, 04:29 PM   #17
chris@borla
 
Drives: 02 True Blue
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: California
Posts: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by g-townmach View Post
How easy did the shorties go in?? Doing install myself soon.
There is a ton of room which makes the install nice and easy.
chris@borla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2009, 05:01 PM   #18
g-townmach
I FARTED
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: cen-tex
Posts: 870
Is everyone reusing the factory gaskets I assume??
__________________
g-townmach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2009, 09:59 PM   #19
Clear Image Auto (Dan)
 
Drives: 95 Chevy Impala SS
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: WA
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING View Post
What was They're Baseline numbers and after install numbers.

All LS3s I dynoed are 372-377 RWHP Bone Stock so

Yours are correct, they may be showing Lower baseline numbers and end up where you are now to show a gain.

I don't expect Shorties to do anything on this car, as the Cats are the Restriction not the Manifolds.

Ted.
Here on the west coast we always seem to end up with lower numbers on the dyno. Best octane gas available here is 92. Anyways, bone stock we saw a high of 374.20 HP with an average of 358 on a DynoJet. Those were "uncorrected" numbers. The "Corrected" numbers were a high of 360.31 with an average of 345. Testing the stock replacement hi-flow converters was good for an average of 20 HP to the wheels, "Corrected". Long tube headers gained us another 25 HP to the wheels without tuning. As you mentioned, the stock converters are definitely a choke point. I doubt shorty headers alone, without addressing the stock converters, will make much of a difference. At least with the dyno numbers "Corrected".
__________________
Warmest regards,
Dan Ferraro
Headers, Exhaust & Intake systems
dan.ferraro@clearimageautomotive.com
Clear Image Automotive
www.clearimageautomotive.com
Clear Image Auto (Dan) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2009, 10:25 PM   #20
bilydean
 
bilydean's Avatar
 
Drives: One of the rare ABM camaros
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Auburn, CA
Posts: 455
Quote:
Originally Posted by g-townmach View Post
Is everyone reusing the factory gaskets I assume??
The JBA shorties come with new header gaskets and they are fairly easy to install. (at least mine were)

Dean
__________________
1100 4/28
2000 5/23
3000 5/27
3400 6/20 TPW of 6/29
3800 7/3
4D00 7/8 interned at QC
4B00 7/16 Released from QC
4200 7/20

8/5 We picked up the car
bilydean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2009, 10:54 PM   #21
caverman


 
caverman's Avatar
 
Drives: '69 SS Convertible
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 7,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clear Image Auto (Dan) View Post
Testing the stock replacement hi-flow converters was good for an average of 20 HP to the wheels, "Corrected".
What did you use for the "Hi-Flow" converters. Is anyone making something to replace the factory converters with hi-flow ones while maintaining the factory headers or maybe shorties?
__________________
-2010 Camaro 2SS | M6 | VR w/White Stripes | 1 3/4" KOOKS - 3" Magnaflow | LPE 3.91 gears | ADM tuned | Halltech w/ADM Scoop | Spohn/BMR Trailing Arm/Toe Rod | BC Coilovers| Pedders FE4 ZL1 swaybars | Cradle/Diff/Radius Rod bushings | VMax TB | Morimoto Projectors | MGW shifter | Red Calipers
Build Journal
caverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 02:40 AM   #22
Clear Image Auto (Dan)
 
Drives: 95 Chevy Impala SS
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: WA
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by caverman View Post
What did you use for the "Hi-Flow" converters. Is anyone making something to replace the factory converters with hi-flow ones while maintaining the factory headers or maybe shorties?
We manufacture our own bolt-in converters as well as "off-road" pipes. We use the metal matrix converter cores. They are 100% stainless steel and extremely free flowing as compared to the stock converters. We TIG weld them in a fixture to locate them exactly every time. Stock flanges to match the factory manifolds are used and a slip fit to the factory or factory replacement exhaust system. They will also bolt-up to any and all shorty headers, as long as the shorty headers are a direct replacement for the stock manifolds. All tubing is 304 stainless steel as well as the factory 2-bolt flange. O2 Chambers are used to prevent codes. Thus tuning is NOT required. I will try to have pictures up on our site tomorrow. Email me direct and I can reply with some pictures.
__________________
Warmest regards,
Dan Ferraro
Headers, Exhaust & Intake systems
dan.ferraro@clearimageautomotive.com
Clear Image Automotive
www.clearimageautomotive.com
Clear Image Auto (Dan) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 10:00 AM   #23
Michael_Js
SoCal C5 Family Member
 
Michael_Js's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS - Black w/IOM; 6M
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 5,298
Send a message via AIM to Michael_Js Send a message via MSN to Michael_Js
Hi Dan. No tuning? So obviously no codes, right? I know you guys don't care about strict CA emissions, but do you think that would pass here?

Thanks!
__________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2010 Black 2SS/RS; 6M; IOM, GFX, sunroof; ADM Race CAI; Zoomers CB; Viper Alarm; Pdaft F&R sways, Adj Endlinks, Rtrailing arms, Camber kit, strut brace, Front Trailing Arm Bushing; SLP Skip-Shift Elim; Tinted lights/windows; Hurst Short-throw; LoJack; Door & Dash ABL Mods; ********; JBA Shorty headers; AACStyle LEDs; Stillen DS rotors, Hawk Ceramic pads; Havoc Blk Chrome wheels: 20x9s; Lingenfelter Blk Al Pedals; RevXtreme Catch Can; Goodridge SS lines; Ported TB; RK Sport hood; Hotchkis chassis brace; KW V3 coilovers;
Michael_Js is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 02:12 PM   #24
Clear Image Auto (Dan)
 
Drives: 95 Chevy Impala SS
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: WA
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael_Js View Post
Hi Dan. No tuning? So obviously no codes, right? I know you guys don't care about strict CA emissions, but do you think that would pass here?

Thanks!
No tuning was required for the stock replacement converters or for the long tube headers with hi-flow converters. Once the 3" exhaust went on we absolutely had to tune for it. So, no codes without tuning. At least the way we fabricate our converters.

As for CA, I have lots of customers down there running our long tube headers on other vehicles. To date, in 10 years, i have only had one call to report he failed a visual. I can not guarantee you will pass CA smog, but I have no doubt the actual pollutants coming out the tail pipes will be within specs. But it doesn't matter as CARB has established any cat converter not stock or meeting stock specs, is not and can not be certified. As easy as the headers/converters and specifically the stock replacement converters are to install, you could always go back to stock every few years.

Thanks for your interest.
__________________
Warmest regards,
Dan Ferraro
Headers, Exhaust & Intake systems
dan.ferraro@clearimageautomotive.com
Clear Image Automotive
www.clearimageautomotive.com
Clear Image Auto (Dan) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 02:23 PM   #25
Michael_Js
SoCal C5 Family Member
 
Michael_Js's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS - Black w/IOM; 6M
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 5,298
Send a message via AIM to Michael_Js Send a message via MSN to Michael_Js
Thanks Dan!
__________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2010 Black 2SS/RS; 6M; IOM, GFX, sunroof; ADM Race CAI; Zoomers CB; Viper Alarm; Pdaft F&R sways, Adj Endlinks, Rtrailing arms, Camber kit, strut brace, Front Trailing Arm Bushing; SLP Skip-Shift Elim; Tinted lights/windows; Hurst Short-throw; LoJack; Door & Dash ABL Mods; ********; JBA Shorty headers; AACStyle LEDs; Stillen DS rotors, Hawk Ceramic pads; Havoc Blk Chrome wheels: 20x9s; Lingenfelter Blk Al Pedals; RevXtreme Catch Can; Goodridge SS lines; Ported TB; RK Sport hood; Hotchkis chassis brace; KW V3 coilovers;
Michael_Js is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2009, 12:02 PM   #26
SSTony

 
SSTony's Avatar
 
Drives: SS Camaro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Piscataway NJ
Posts: 1,782
Send a message via AIM to SSTony
Quote:
Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING View Post
What was They're Baseline numbers and after install numbers.

All LS3s I dynoed are 372-377 RWHP Bone Stock so

Yours are correct, they may be showing Lower baseline numbers and end up where you are now to show a gain.

I don't expect Shorties to do anything on this car, as the Cats are the Restriction not the Manifolds.

Ted.
I wonder if replacing the the cats with a better flowing cat would be a better gain in HP than doing headers. Sure would be cheaper.
__________________
SSTony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2009, 12:37 PM   #27
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,416
Quote:
Originally Posted by SSTony View Post
I wonder if replacing the the cats with a better flowing cat would be a better gain in HP than doing headers. Sure would be cheaper.
Trust me, Just install the LT headers and High Flow Cats you will not be disappointed.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 39 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2009, 09:32 PM   #28
Clear Image Auto (Dan)
 
Drives: 95 Chevy Impala SS
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: WA
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by SSTony View Post
I wonder if replacing the the cats with a better flowing cat would be a better gain in HP than doing headers. Sure would be cheaper.
As I mentioned above, hi-flow converters, (direct factory replacement), yielded 20 HP to the wheels. Long tube headers were good for another 25. So, yes, replacing the stock converters with hi-flows will make give you a nice gain for a decent price.
__________________
Warmest regards,
Dan Ferraro
Headers, Exhaust & Intake systems
dan.ferraro@clearimageautomotive.com
Clear Image Automotive
www.clearimageautomotive.com
Clear Image Auto (Dan) is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question about potential exhaust setup. Xanthos Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 22 07-29-2011 11:59 AM
New flash tuner - ?old to 'Stang - new to 'Maro? radz28 Tuning / Diagnostics -- engine and transmission 0 08-26-2009 02:10 PM
Livernois Remote Tuning HohlShot Tuning / Diagnostics -- engine and transmission 1 08-19-2009 11:25 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.