engine cover - Page 2 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

1_2Many · 11-01-2008, 03:57 PM

The engine cover is just about the only thing I hate about this car...and it's the only part I'm interested in replacing with aftermarket. I really hope GM gets the message on this one and does something about it.

You don't see Ford putting this crap on the Mustang...I mean look how much better the Bullit motor looks stock over this fake cover junk:

headpunter · 11-01-2008, 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1_2Many

The engine cover is just about the only thing I hate about this car...and it's the only part I'm interested in replacing with aftermarket. I really hope GM gets the message on this one and does something about it.

You don't see Ford putting this crap on the Mustang...I mean look how much better the Bullit motor looks stock over this fake cover junk:

for crying out loud....if you dont like it TAKE IT OFF....i know i am

*Mr. Wyndham* · 11-01-2008, 08:30 PM

hmf. I seem to be the only one who prefers the look of a nicely-executed engine cover over a bunch of wires and hoses......

rolnslo · 11-01-2008, 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dragoneye

hmf. I seem to be the only one who prefers the look of a nicely-executed engine cover over a bunch of wires and hoses......

Nope, I'd rather open the hood and see the cover too. I only want to see all the wires, belts, and hoses when I'm in there to fix something or install aftermarket parts.

69er · 11-01-2008, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dragoneye

hmf. I seem to be the only one who prefers the look of a nicely-executed engine cover over a bunch of wires and hoses......

I'm sorta in between. The Camaro's covers too much. No cover leaves too much junk in view.

The corvette's cover enough of the ignition coils and other extraneous wiring, etc, but leaves the intake runners exposed. I think it's just right.

IMO, the new engines being completely just don't have the good looks of an old 60's-70's SBC.

1_2Many · 11-02-2008, 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dragoneye

hmf. I seem to be the only one who prefers the look of a nicely-executed engine cover over a bunch of wires and hoses......

The problem isn't because there is A cover it's because it's THAT cover....bulky and cheap looking. I would gladly put the LS3 Corvette covers on, but would prefer it to say Camaro.

Crowley · 11-02-2008, 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1_2Many

The engine cover is just about the only thing I hate about this car...and it's the only part I'm interested in replacing with aftermarket. I really hope GM gets the message on this one and does something about it.

You don't see Ford putting this crap on the Mustang...I mean look how much better the Bullit motor looks stock over this fake cover junk:

Agreed ... I love the look of my 98 and 04 Cobra engines ... pure SEX ..

Crowley

smike07 · 11-02-2008, 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dragoneye

hmf. I seem to be the only one who prefers the look of a nicely-executed engine cover over a bunch of wires and hoses......

Nah, I like the covers as well, I just prefer the shiny concept cover. I just hope GM will offer one eventually. I'll give GM the benefit of the doubt and wait a while before getting an aftermarket one, but it will be replaced.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wm Holden

GM does an awsome job optimising the flow and efficiency of the LS series engines...

I don't know if i would want to pull the engine, tear it down, polish and rebalance ...to gain ultra minimal hp.

But like everyone says...it's your car..do what you want...most of all...have fun!

Yup, I'll have fun with mine. I just prefer to maximize the full potential of everything my car comes with so I don't have to replace vital components. I'll put together a custom engine eventually, but it'll go into a restoration project when I am able to afford one. Likely, a '69 Camaro. The only things I'll replace on my 5th gen. are original filters, plugs, wires, injectors, and fluids. Maybe gears, pumps, and the drive shaft. I will, however, add a suspension kit. I'm weird about the engine for some reason.

Thanks for the tip, though!

Supermans · 11-02-2008, 01:26 AM

Cover, I don't need no stinkin cover..

Does anyone have a picture of the engine without the cover?

MCMLXIX · 11-03-2008, 02:32 AM

OR

Both from a vette site... http://www.eastcoastvette.com/index.html

Sterling · 11-03-2008, 02:40 AM

Holy Crap!

LSxJunkie · 11-03-2008, 02:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Supermans

Cover, I don't need no stinkin cover..

Does anyone have a picture of the engine without the cover?

Looks like every other LSx with the fuel rail covers taken off. Throttle body, intake, fuel rails, valve covers with coil packs and plug wires running down off them.

EDIT: I still have the FRCs off my wrecked GTO. They make a nice wall fixture, but that's about it. I pulled them off the day I bought the car.

MCMLXIX · 11-03-2008, 02:42 AM

I thought these said "Chevrolet" not just "Corvette" but cool retro look...
http://www.aatcars.com

headpunter · 11-03-2008, 02:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MCMLXIX

OR

Both from a vette site... http://www.eastcoastvette.com/index.html

did you notice that those cost $1000+

11-01-2008, 08:30 PM	#17
Mr. Wyndham I used to be Dragoneye... Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Buffalo, NY Posts: 31,873 View My Garage	hmf. I seem to be the only one who prefers the look of a nicely-executed engine cover over a bunch of wires and hoses...... __________________ *"Keep the faith."* - Fbodfather

11-02-2008, 01:26 AM	#23
Supermans Camaro & Stang Enthusiast Drives: 2011 Mustang 5.0 in Kona Blue Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Miami Posts: 4,729 View My Garage	Cover, I don't need no stinkin cover.. Does anyone have a picture of the engine without the cover? __________________ Bought my Camaro from Eric Hall(817) 421-7266

11-03-2008, 02:32 AM	#24
MCMLXIX 1967 Chevelle Pro-Touring Drives: 1967 Chevelle Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 108	OR Both from a vette site... http://www.eastcoastvette.com/index.html __________________ 1969 Camaro in lots of pieces 1967 Chevelle * Pro-Touring Build in Progress * 1972 K5 Blazer LQ9/4L80e

11-03-2008, 02:42 AM	#27
MCMLXIX 1967 Chevelle Pro-Touring Drives: 1967 Chevelle Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 108	I thought these said "Chevrolet" not just "Corvette" but cool retro look... http://www.aatcars.com __________________ 1969 Camaro in lots of pieces 1967 Chevelle * Pro-Touring Build in Progress * 1972 K5 Blazer LQ9/4L80e

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Heres one... ordering the Engine cover option...	Rogue Leader	Cosmetics and Lighting Modification Discussions	29	10-28-2008 02:33 PM
LS9 SC old news. Here comes the LSX. 850HP, 840 lb-ft of Torgue	13F20	5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions	15	09-22-2008 05:35 PM
Camaro ls3 news...true or false?	Dark Knight	Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons	74	06-05-2008 06:29 PM
GM moves closer to HCCI engine production	Scotsman	Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons	16	05-16-2008 07:16 PM
Axial Vector Engine	Mr. Wyndham	General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion	6	06-20-2007 05:00 PM

11-01-2008, 03:57 PM	#15
1_2Many Drives: 2008 Suzuki SX4 Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: SoCal Posts: 785 View My Garage	The engine cover is just about the only thing I hate about this car...and it's the only part I'm interested in replacing with aftermarket. I really hope GM gets the message on this one and does something about it. You don't see Ford putting this crap on the Mustang...I mean look how much better the Bullit motor looks stock over this fake cover junk:

11-03-2008, 02:40 AM	#25
Sterling Drives: 2010 Camaro 1LT/RS M6 Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Fairhaven, MA Posts: 5,882 View My Garage	Holy Crap!