Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-01-2008, 01:59 PM   #71
joes3rdcamaro82/91/2010
Z28 Hold Out!
 
joes3rdcamaro82/91/2010's Avatar
 
Drives: 2000 Monte Carlo SS
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wichita, Ks.
Posts: 351
If the new camaro has 400 hp base V8 and comes in at 3800 pounds, how is that going to be any better than the 2006 GTO?
joes3rdcamaro82/91/2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2008, 04:53 PM   #72
Supermans
Camaro & Stang Enthusiast
 
Supermans's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Mustang 5.0 in Kona Blue
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 4,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by joes3rdcamaro82/91/2010 View Post
If the new camaro has 400 hp base V8 and comes in at 3800 pounds, how is that going to be any better than the 2006 GTO?
It will look like a muscle car and less like a sedan. It will perhaps handle better being a newer platform and tested at The Ring (If standard V8 was tested there and not just the SS version..hopefully upgraded suspension is available for standard V8 as an option). The interior will probably be a lot nicer as well.. A 400HP V8 is plenty fast for me and I would be happy with that number at 3800 pounds...
Supermans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2008, 09:52 PM   #73
Omega94
 
Omega94's Avatar
 
Drives: 1994 Chevrolet Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Greater Philadelphia Area
Posts: 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supermans View Post
It will look like a muscle car and less like a sedan. It will perhaps handle better being a newer platform and tested at The Ring (If standard V8 was tested there and not just the SS version..hopefully upgraded suspension is available for standard V8 as an option). The interior will probably be a lot nicer as well.. A 400HP V8 is plenty fast for me and I would be happy with that number at 3800 pounds...
BIG +1
__________________

1994 Camaro 3.4l V6, 5-speed, SLP Loudmouth I cat-back exhaust.
It's loud, slow as all get out, but loud
No more money going into this one...everything's being saved for my 5th Gen.
2010 Camaro SS 6-speed, Black/Black
Omega94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 12:49 AM   #74
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 31,873
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
I just wanted to let everyone know that I added the GTO's specs to that comparison chart.
__________________
"Keep the faith." - Fbodfather
Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 10:36 PM   #75
LS9CamaroSS
 
LS9CamaroSS's Avatar
 
Drives: Cavalier RS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Jordan, NY
Posts: 569
what platform was the GTO on? because that curb weight does make me nervous... if the Zeta platform is a heavy one what is going to stop the Camaro being 2 tons? i know the G8 isn't all too heavy for it's size though... so maybe i just need to breath...
LS9CamaroSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2008, 03:58 PM   #76
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by AirGoya View Post
Can someone explain to me why the camaro (2 door) would weigh more than a sedan, like lets say an impala SS (4 door). The impala weighs in at 3711 pounds. I understand that the larger engine weighs a lot but thats why i picked the SS because of its large 5.3 V8. If you asked me, a car with 2 doors would prob weigh a lot less than a 4 door.
coupes require much more bracing to keep things stiff.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2008, 05:01 PM   #77
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crazy Coast
Posts: 15,795
Not that I'm in any disagreement, but I just find it hard to understand why a coupe would weigh more. It just seems to me having more openings (i.e. doors) rigidity would go down, not up. I'm sure GM will be using a lot of high-strength-low-alloy steels like they've been doing as of late. They were hydroforming a lot of these panels in the past, which helped preserve the thickness and strength in the panels, so I'm sure they'll follow suit with something like that on these cars.

I just hope they stay away from plastic or composite panels, like they had in the 4th. Gen. It just made the car feel cheap... IMHO.
__________________

'20 ZL1 Black "Fury"
A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor
Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2008, 06:12 PM   #78
theholycow


 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Drives: '02 GMC Sierra, '80 Lesabre
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: RI
Posts: 1,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by radz282003 View Post
It just seems to me having more openings (i.e. doors) rigidity would go down, not up.
That logic would be pretty bulletproof if a coupe had doors the size of a sedan's front doors. That big opening requires more added stiffness. Four door cars include a nice piece of structure between the front and rear doors. I'd guess it could go either way.
__________________
Removing weight has surprisingly little effect on fuel economy
Engine break-in procedure | Gear ratios
2002 GMC Sierra 4x4 5.3 (190,000 miles and going strong)
1980 Buick Lesabre family heirloom with 36,000 miles
2008 Volkswagen Rabbit 2 door I5-2.5 5spd DD lease
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSpike23 View Post
she really underestimates the damage i would do to her reproductive organs
http://allOffTopic.com is the place for all the naughty stuff you can't get away with on this forum...
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 02:48 AM   #79
LS9CamaroSS
 
LS9CamaroSS's Avatar
 
Drives: Cavalier RS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Jordan, NY
Posts: 569
Quote:
Originally Posted by theholycow View Post
That logic would be pretty bulletproof if a coupe had doors the size of a sedan's front doors. That big opening requires more added stiffness. Four door cars include a nice piece of structure between the front and rear doors. I'd guess it could go either way.
I'd agree with you, but the Coupes have to have a B-pillar now in order to meet crash requirements. Hence the stationary rear windows. I hope the Convertible comes in a hard-top so i can have the look of the coupe with roll down rear windows...
LS9CamaroSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2009, 01:04 PM   #80
ghillie
 
Drives: 92 Z28
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1
I know Im digging this up from the past but after reading this I felt compelled to direct everyone to an official GM posting about the curb weight of the new Camaro. This is from the PDF that you can find on GMs website:

3750/1705 – LT w/automatic
3741/1700 – LT w/manual
3769/1713 – LS w/automatic
3780/1718 – LS w/manual
3913/1779 – SS w/automatic
3860/1755 – SS w/manual

For those that want this document go to

http://www.chevrolet.com/es/pdfsdownloads/Camaro.pdf
ghillie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2009, 01:06 PM   #81
fdjizm
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2008 Mustang GT/CS
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,429
i dont see how weight is the single deciding factor when buying a car, some of your really wouldnt buy the car you want because it weighed too much? there are dozens of other things to consider when buying a car and weight and hp shouldnt be the only thing.
fdjizm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2009, 01:12 PM   #82
Crowley
Okie doke
 
Crowley's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 GT500
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: McKinney Texas
Posts: 3,567
My goodness ..

__________________
Crowley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2009, 01:15 PM   #83
BackinBlackSS/RS
Go Blue!!!!!
 
BackinBlackSS/RS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Cruze LT
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 23,290
This car is HOT!!! Weight is not gonna matter to almost everybody that buys it except to the hardcore racing enthusiasts. It will not affect sales in the grand scheme of things.
BackinBlackSS/RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2009, 01:19 PM   #84
thejbyrd
 
Drives: My wife nuts with my obsession
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Florissant,Mo
Posts: 329
Not worried, this is my DREAM car!
thejbyrd is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
weight loss CamaroSpike23 Off-topic Discussions 8 09-17-2009 08:16 PM
Camaro Weight JeepinMatt 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 62 03-26-2008 10:17 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.