Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Chevy Camaro vs...


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-16-2010, 06:14 PM   #113
kevin2323


 
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by nester7929 View Post
I just bought a Mustang with every option but the Glass roof and it wasn't anywhere near that price. With Nav, Brembos, 3.73s, premium trim, heated seats, etc. it came out to 40,200 MSRP, $3,300 less than the Chally
and it wont keep up with this model. so its worth the extra 3k.
kevin2323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 06:14 PM   #114
kevin2323


 
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
Forgive this mere Camaro forum moderator for not being up to date on Challengers ...
im glad u got the joke -_-
kevin2323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 06:34 PM   #115
Zabo
Gunning for Sixth
 
Zabo's Avatar
 
Drives: '03 ZR2 Blazer
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Woodhaven, Michigan
Posts: 9,358
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xanthos View Post


At least the V6 should be more competitive now. Weight should change from its previous 3750, and now it has a comparable power to the 3.6 LLT and the new 3.7 from ford. But it doesn't rev as high as either of them.

I can't wait for a full road test.
- X
x2

And know if those wheels on the SE are SE base wheels on the level with GM heritage wheels. If so GM.. you need to do a little work and drop the IROC/Heritage wheels for something a bit more fitting.

I seriously dig those Mopar Heritage wheels.. holy crap.
Zabo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 07:05 PM   #116
nester7929
Rice Harvester
 
nester7929's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Bright Yellow 2SS/RS
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plainview, TX
Posts: 1,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin2323 View Post
and it wont keep up with this model. so its worth the extra 3k.
The article says mid 4s and high 12s. Sounds a lot like the 5.0.
nester7929 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 07:12 PM   #117
2010 SSRS



 
2010 SSRS's Avatar
 
Drives: 3 V8 Camaros
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Ocean State
Posts: 111,187
let the Challenger/Mustang wars begin, lol
__________________
Jannetty Racing JRE Street Package
2010 SSRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 07:15 PM   #118
BigHemiSrt
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 07 Dodge Charger SRT8
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: In Space
Posts: 614
Quote:
Originally Posted by nester7929 View Post
It's cool, but at 43k it should be able to dust the Mustang and Camaro, not just keep up.
This car WILL be faster than the SS both the LS3/L99 and I think its a toss up between it and the 5.0. They have a video of one running 12.44@110.72 BONE STOCK down to the tires. FIRST RUNS EVER. Now the Z28, thats a whole nother story. Lets see how much that things going to cost. If it close to 50k, id bet my bottom dollar that I could throw a supercharger on that new 6.4 for around the same price and smoke the hell out of that Z28....
BigHemiSrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 07:19 PM   #119
Entaille

 
Drives: 2018 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Lake Stevens
Posts: 1,005
aside from the seats, I am really partial to that white with blue stripes : )
__________________

Entaille is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 07:26 PM   #120
nester7929
Rice Harvester
 
nester7929's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Bright Yellow 2SS/RS
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plainview, TX
Posts: 1,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigHemiSrt View Post
This car WILL be faster than the SS both the LS3/L99 and I think its a toss up between it and the 5.0. They have a video of one running 12.44@110.72 BONE STOCK down to the tires. FIRST RUNS EVER. Now the Z28, thats a whole nother story. Lets see how much that things going to cost. If it close to 50k, id bet my bottom dollar that I could throw a supercharger on that new 6.4 for around the same price and smoke the hell out of that Z28....
I'll wait for the official reviews for times. The "stock" drag strip thing could just be hype.
nester7929 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 09:01 AM   #121
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by nester7929 View Post
The article says mid 4s and high 12s. Sounds a lot like the 5.0.
They have already gotten 12.44@110.7 out of it.
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 09:17 AM   #122
1bad65
Banned
 
Drives: 2007 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,148
I'll bet once it's tested by all the same mags etc that tested the 5.0, the 5.0 will run better 1/4 mile times than the SRT8 392.
1bad65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 09:28 AM   #123
chain777
 
Drives: Slow
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Metro Chicago,Illinois
Posts: 560
I love this picture:




That ET is incredible. I don't think I've ever seen such a low ET combined with a sub 111mph run on a car that wasn't AWD, or had at least drag radials. How the hell does it hook like that?
chain777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 09:35 AM   #124
toesuf94


 
toesuf94's Avatar
 
Drives: THR #11 E-force supercharged
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 4,746
Send a message via MSN to toesuf94
Man - that is a cool car.

I am so happy to be living in the new era of muscle cars.
__________________
Cars and women are both going to give you problems...but you can pay somebody else to fix your car!
toesuf94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 09:36 AM   #125
toesuf94


 
toesuf94's Avatar
 
Drives: THR #11 E-force supercharged
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 4,746
Send a message via MSN to toesuf94
Man - that is a cool car.

I am so happy to be living in the new era of muscle cars.
__________________
Cars and women are both going to give you problems...but you can pay somebody else to fix your car!
toesuf94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 09:39 AM   #126
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1bad65 View Post
I'll bet once it's tested by all the same mags etc that tested the 5.0, the 5.0 will run better 1/4 mile times than the SRT8 392.
Probably lol, but I predict an average of around 12.6 from owners
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2011 Dodge Challenger SRT8 Rumored to get 6.4-liter HEMI Grimelock2009 General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 162 04-22-2010 05:15 PM
Normalcy Is Not An Option 6 Shooter General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 8 03-06-2010 11:12 AM
Challenger Pricing LSxcellent General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 31 12-03-2007 09:00 PM
Ontario to become home of the all-new 2008 Dodge Challenger Mr. Wyndham General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 3 08-09-2007 02:54 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.