Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-25-2008, 02:26 PM   #15
Mr Twisty


 
Mr Twisty's Avatar
 
Drives: the 2nd amendment home
Join Date: May 2008
Location: OK
Posts: 14,707
Welcome...I want that LS3 poster! Got the L99 and this one at Indy.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
Mr Twisty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2008, 02:27 PM   #16
Robert91RS

 
Robert91RS's Avatar
 
Drives: Everywhere
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: TX
Posts: 852
Quote:
Originally Posted by o2camaross View Post
look at the cam gear on the L99. WAY different, i wonder what it does? maybe some sort of clutch the advances or retards the cam. I think ill call it Variable Valve timing and patent it
LOL. refer here http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7057
Robert91RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2008, 03:04 PM   #17
Grape Ape
 
Drives: 96 Bronco w/ a 5 speed
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: PNW
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert91RS View Post
That appears to be the spring in the hydraulic roller lifter.
They are needed to force the lower portion of the follower down onto the base circle of the cam when it is in deact mode so as to be ready to reactive and probably keep the pushrod tip on the rocker. Without them the lifter might stay up where the cam lobe pushes it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert91RS View Post
I bet it's so that if the afm gets stuck and holds a valve open it won't make contact with the piston. I know you don't want to miss oil changes with the afm or use the wrong oil.
The AFM deact lifter could fail in a way that would cause it not to reactivate (and the valve not to open) or it could fail to deactivate (and act as a normal lifter). But I don’t see how it could cause the valve to stay open, at least not outside of a bizarre failure that would also apply to a non-AFM engine.

I think that the cuts are an illustrator error since the location of the cuts doesn’t make any sense for that head design.

I’m reminded of an infamous H&K pistol ad that showed the rounds loaded into the magazine backwards. The people who do this kind of work are not car guys or gun guys, they are guys who went to art school and somehow managed to learn how to make things that look like things. But if you don’t know what you are looking at you are libel to goof a detail every once in a while.

Or maybe they are just worried about valve float.
Grape Ape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2008, 03:07 PM   #18
Robert91RS

 
Robert91RS's Avatar
 
Drives: Everywhere
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: TX
Posts: 852
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grape Ape View Post
They are needed to force the lower portion of the follower down onto the base circle of the cam when it is in deact mode so as to be ready to reactive and probably keep the pushrod tip on the rocker. Without them the lifter might stay up where the cam lobe pushes it.



The AFM deact lifter could fail in a way that would cause it not to reactivate (and the valve not to open) or it could fail to deactivate (and act as a normal lifter). But I don’t see how it could cause the valve to stay open, at least not outside of a bizarre failure that would also apply to a non-AFM engine.

I think that the cuts are an illustrator error since the location of the cuts doesn’t make any sense for that head design.

I’m reminded of an infamous H&K pistol ad that showed the rounds loaded into the magazine backwards. The people who do this kind of work are not car guys or gun guys, they are guys who went to art school and somehow managed to learn how to make things that look like things. But if you don’t know what you are looking at you are libel to goof a detail every once in a while.

Or maybe they are just worried about valve float.
Haha I will have to look for that H&K add. I didn't think about there locations.
Robert91RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 04:42 AM   #19
zebra
just can't seem to leave
 
zebra's Avatar
 
Drives: your mom wild!!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: cold & windy
Posts: 10,625
__________________
Eve ('00 FRC): hot-air intake
Rowan ('09 H3): 5spd mom-mobile
Penny ('99 Sierra): 5.3 / HD 5spd... gone but not forgotten
Samson ('18 HD): compounded 408
zebra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 06:34 AM   #20
Camaro68


 
Camaro68's Avatar
 
Drives: 68 Camaro 327ci 2SS/RS 376ci LS3
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Prince William, VA
Posts: 2,703
Thumbs up awesome

Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterCamaro69 View Post
Welcome...I want that LS3 poster! Got the L99 and this one at Indy.
that's awesome that you got those signitures on the DI Engine poster
__________________

6000 Vehicle Delivered to Customer 6-23-10
Camaro68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 08:55 AM   #21
glazr69
 
glazr69's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Charger R/T
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grape Ape View Post
They are needed to force the lower portion of the follower down onto the base circle of the cam when it is in deact mode so as to be ready to reactive and probably keep the pushrod tip on the rocker. Without them the lifter might stay up where the cam lobe pushes it.



The AFM deact lifter could fail in a way that would cause it not to reactivate (and the valve not to open) or it could fail to deactivate (and act as a normal lifter). But I don’t see how it could cause the valve to stay open, at least not outside of a bizarre failure that would also apply to a non-AFM engine.

I think that the cuts are an illustrator error since the location of the cuts doesn’t make any sense for that head design.

I’m reminded of an infamous H&K pistol ad that showed the rounds loaded into the magazine backwards. The people who do this kind of work are not car guys or gun guys, they are guys who went to art school and somehow managed to learn how to make things that look like things. But if you don’t know what you are looking at you are libel to goof a detail every once in a while.

Or maybe they are just worried about valve float.
When deactivating cylinders, the valves on the inactive ones are held open. This helps resuce mechanical losses, as you dont want to be compressing air on the compression strokes, and dont want to be creating a vaccum on what would be the combustion stroke.
__________________
glazr69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2009, 11:07 AM   #22
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 31,876
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
Quote:
Originally Posted by glazr69 View Post
When deactivating cylinders, the valves on the inactive ones are held open. This helps resuce mechanical losses, as you dont want to be compressing air on the compression strokes, and dont want to be creating a vaccum on what would be the combustion stroke.
Not in GM's version. They keep the valves closed, so the air being compressed acts like a spring during piston travel to BDC. Supposedly, Chrysler's 5.7 V8 acts the way you described. And it seems to work better, because they're getting another mpg more out of the system.
__________________
"Keep the faith." - Fbodfather
Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 11:36 AM   #23
Robert91RS

 
Robert91RS's Avatar
 
Drives: Everywhere
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: TX
Posts: 852
Just an update now that the L99 and LS3 are both in the GM catalog now. For grinns I check the pistons and they are using different numbers. The crankshaft castings are also different. These motors may be a little more unique than we thought.
Robert91RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 06:30 PM   #24
CamaroSpike23
Truth Enforcer
 
CamaroSpike23's Avatar
 
Drives: anything I can get my hands on
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,797
Send a message via Yahoo to CamaroSpike23
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert91RS View Post
Just an update now that the L99 and LS3 are both in the GM catalog now. For grinns I check the pistons and they are using different numbers. The crankshaft castings are also different. These motors may be a little more unique than we thought.
the pistons are different. the L99 has dished pistons

and I would imagine that the L99 crankshaft is slightly lighter to aid in the fact that AFM is having the engine turn over and move the car with only 4 cyls. just a thought tho.
__________________
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BowtieGuy View Post
Nobody makes CamaroSpike happy. You just disgust him a little less than other people.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WheelmanSS View Post
Post count is truly an accurate measure of how cool someone is on the Internet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Norris View Post
I piss excellence
and fart awesomeness
"You can think I'm wrong, but that's no reason to quit thinking.”
Quote:
Originally Posted by Overflow View Post
But not all people were born awesome like you, Spike.
CamaroSpike23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 08:17 PM   #25
fad1

 
fad1's Avatar
 
Drives: Future 5th gen Camaro
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 1,108
I may just stick with the L99 auto in my SS and just be happy with it. I can try to improve fuel economy and HP by CAI and some nice Exhausts.
fad1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 08:21 PM   #26
Andro
NOICE!!! ™
 
Andro's Avatar
 
Drives: Force Fed 427
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: GOT BOOST?
Posts: 5,214
Nice Find
__________________
Andro is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.