![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 990
|
What ever happened with all that Vararam Hype?
Curious I recall when it was coming out i wanted one so bad then heard all the issues with them and the radiator being loose and decided on another CAI.
I was just browsing Camaro Performers and saw a tiny blurb on the 40-50hp gains and I am still shocked they are still making such claims. I dont see much posted on the boards regarding this kit anymore. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
SoCal Race Team #13
|
Many people here are running them, the initial design got ALOT of flak because of the factory MAF. Biggest downfall is the non-compatibility with aftermarket power adders.
Personally I love mine, nothing makes more sense to me as an engineer than an OTR design (Especially in the desert). Lower (relatively) IAT is always a good thing. Also anyone who believes more than 5ish HP without a tune out of a CAI better see a doctor.
__________________
A.K.A - Diarmadhi (old handle) - So much to do.. So little money
Owner : Fast-Stache Industries LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
www.Camaro5store.com
|
I actually still think it's one hell of an intake.
Quite frankly, if I didn't have the signed rotofab radiator cover, the VR would still be in my car. Yes, it actually DID make phenomenal gains. Turns out that the main issue was the massive amount of air flowing over the MAF and the MAF not being able to properly read it right....something to that effect. I finally got a new MAF for the last VR intake and it was a total different intake compared to the two I had tried before. There was NO bucking with the last intake at all. It was truly incredible. The radiator issue was a non-issue. Everything stayed in place. I put on a good 20k miles with the radiator not screwed in. No problems there. And, if you are curious about my honesty and integrity on the fact that it ran like a champ....I have nothing to gain on this one...why would I say it was that great if I didn't use it anymore? No point in it. If it were crap, I'd say it was. Yep...one bad ass intake, if you ask me. I'm glad I got my personally signed cover by all the folks at the Oshawa plant, but I sure as hell miss the power from the VR!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Wonderfully Awful Idea
|
I still love mine and the design makes the most sense to me. I'm sticking with it.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yeah all fine and probably a good intake but why lie and claim 50HP increases??
Be real and state you are just another 5-10 HP intake like most of the rest out there. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Transformer 1SS Camaro Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Kingsland, Ga
Posts: 2,553
|
I really enjoy my Vararam. The claims are based on driving conditions with the hood closed. It is also BHP not RWHP. With the hood closed, most intakes will take hot air from the engine compartment where the Vararam still gets fresh clean air. It even gets better the faster you go. So if you take everything in account it could give you that much bhp compared to stock. I think 40-50 is also with a tune.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Drives: 2000 Camaro SS Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Louisville, Ky.
Posts: 25,165
|
In back to back dyno pulls of stock versus Vararam no tune they are making around 20 rwhp. That is a very solid result. The only other combination that gets that kind of improvement on it's own is the CAI Inc with a scoop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 silver SS Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Midland TX
Posts: 1,063
|
The ~40hp gains are the tune versions so a good part of that 40 is the tune... I love my VR! It out performs most on the market.
__________________
2012 Corvette Grandsport... TSP headers, Borla S-Type, BTR Stage 3 N/A cam, Halltech Super Bee MF108
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
The stick man
Drives: 2004 GTO - C5 'vert - SRX Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In the new shop... working 24/7
Posts: 151
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() On our completely stock 2010 Camaro SS (automatic) from simply bolting on the New Era OTR air intake system, we gained 22rwhp and 24lb/ft rwtq. With the addition of a custom PCM tune on this particular car, we were able to gain an additional 8rwhp and 4lb/ft rwtq for an overall gain of 30rwhp and 28lb/ft rwtq!
__________________
![]() PONY WARS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Drives: 2011 2SSRS 6spd Synergy Green Join Date: May 2011
Location: Clarklake, Mi
Posts: 21
|
I love mine. Looks great on the car. Sounds AWESOME. (gives that old school open air cleaner 4 barrel sound) and seems to run better with it.
I really don't care about 5 or 10 HP either way when it makes 426hp to start with. I drive my car, I enjoy the way it looks, sounds and feels. The Vararam compliments all of those things. Also, their customer service is top notch. I felt confident buying it from them because even if I wasn't satisfied, they would do what it took to make it right.
__________________
2011 Synergy Green 2SSRS LS3 with Kooks coated step headers, Kooks high flow cats, Corsa cat back, Vararam, Sprint throttle booster, Retro shifter, skip shift eliminator, Retro SS badges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If I was running a V8 I would be getting this intake for sure. 20 HP gain w/o a tune is nothing to sneeze at, and tuned Vararam getting you 40-50 hp gain is awesome.
I have a v6 obviously, and I am running the Injen CAI but if I still had a stock intake on and was in the market for an upgrade, I would have a hard time choosing between the Vararam and Injen.
__________________
Formerly owner of:
2012 2SS/RS Build Thread - Totaled by red light runner 2010 LT/RS Build Thread - Traded in for 2012 2SS 2007 Acura TSX 1992 Oldsmobile Achieva V6 1992 Mercury Sable |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
220/221 whatever it takes
Drives: See sig.... Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Lafayette In
Posts: 1,132
|
So a switch to the Vararam for me would put me around 500rwhp?
__________________
Brent
2022 BMW X5 M50i 2022 Ram TRX 2021 GT500 CFHP 2016 Challenger Hellcat A8 1058whp/898wtq 1970 Chevelle SS396 4spd |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() Drives: 2023 ZL1 Camaro Hot Red Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 358
|
I love mine too!! I purchased my first Vararam back in 2005 for my Corvette. I was sold on it back then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Vararam Dyno on LS3 - coming soon | Viral | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 137 | 07-13-2011 07:30 PM |
| Has anyone painted their Vararam? | MikeJrSS | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 22 | 05-11-2011 09:48 PM |
| Vararam Ram Air V | tjd24 | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 29 | 06-22-2010 01:04 PM |
| Vararam Ram Air V | tjd24 | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 58 | 08-22-2009 06:55 PM |
| Is all the hype substaniated | nards444 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 59 | 05-22-2009 04:54 PM |