![]() |
|
|
#29 | |
|
Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 251
|
Quote:
Again, AIRAID does not recommend this mod. It does “Trick” the computer to read a cooler air temp, which can change the timing and cause harm to the vehicle. I am glad that “YOU” have had Zero issues, however we do not recommend it at all. If you would like, PM me your # and I can have one of our engineers contact you and explain to you how this works, and why we do not recommend it. Thanks, David |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Red Brick of Vengeance!
Drives: 12 Second Brick Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
|
Quote:
The issue is the fact that the stock MAF/IAT is prone to "heat soak". This is not an issue with the Airaid CAI. It is an issue with the stock MAF/IAT sensor. Let me try explaining it this way. Go out and drive your car until it's good and hot... Now park it for say 15 or 20 minutes. During that time the MAF/IAT sensor becomes "heat soaked". Watch the video showing this: The IAT temp spikes to 122 degrees. When the car starts and revs a bit it does drop down to 100 to 102 degrees... better but still well above the 82 degrees it started at. It takes about 3 miles of highway speed driving to bring that temp down in the 80s. In stop and go traffic it never recovers... the problem is the IAT sensor is buried inside the MAF housing and at this point really isn't accurately reading the actual air temp... so in this case the stock IAT is "tricking" the computer into thinking the air is HOTTER than it is. More from the story... After doing this video we pulled the car into the shop, opened the hood and removed the stock air box lid to install the new IAT sensor. Not sure exactly how long we took but we didn't rush it... Maybe 10 or 15 minutes? So during this time, the stock MAF/IAT sensor was out of the car sitting on the work bench, exposed to the shop air! Now here's the thing. We put the air box lid back on and before we taped up the wires I took a few pictures to document things.... 1) The temp in the shop was 65 degrees. Car has been in the shop hood open and the MAF sensor has been out of the car most of the time: 2) Hook the stock IAT sensor up. The stock IAT sensor is reading 97 degrees: 4) Switch over to the new IAT sensor. Sensor is reading the air temp as 72 degrees. Remember the hood has been open 20 minutes at least... the air box has been open... the MAF sensor out of the car... which temp do you think more accurately reflects the air temp? Again, the issue is not with the Airaid or it's design. The issue is with the stock MAF/IAT sensor. Once the stock MAF/IAT sensor get's hot, the internal IAT appears to read the residual heat coming off the sensor itself as opposed to reading the actually temp of the air going by... so by your definition it's "tricking" the computer into thinking the air is hotter than it is! I know this works for me... I'll do the disclaimer... do at your own risk... your mileage may vary... but if I'm so far off base why are so many others doing this and and why do companies sell complete relocation kits?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
![]() Drives: RY 2LT/RS Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Niagara Falls ONT.
Posts: 457
|
im not picking up this density thing, is colder air not more dense then hot air...? so would it not be benificial to have denser air
__________________
Airaid Intake And Solo CatBack Solo Highflow Cats |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Red Brick of Vengeance!
Drives: 12 Second Brick Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
|
Quote:
http://www.dragtimes.com/da-density-...calculator.php
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
![]() Drives: 1LT; IBM; 6 Spd Manual Join Date: May 2009
Location: Heath, Tx.
Posts: 499
|
Given that fact of cooler air density (basically the reason for a CAI system - mass airflow and in the Airaid system, through a venturi that increases the flow rate) and that the Airaid system does in fact appear to provide a cooler read for the temp sensor, why would'nt a car with an Airaid system at a higher altitude be more likley to run like a car at sea level as mentioned prior in the thread.
__________________
1LT; Airaid CAI; Flowmaster American Thunder Axelback; Int Floor Lts; RS Spoiler; Radio Controls; Sequential tail lights; Oil Catch Can; VMAX Throttle Body; MACE plenum spacer; Mace manifold insulator[/I] |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Red Brick of Vengeance!
Drives: 12 Second Brick Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
|
Quote:
http://www.dragtimes.com/da-density-...calculator.php
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
![]() |
Hello- I am new to the mod game so bear with me. First, it seems that a cai will bring out more torque and horsepower in most vehicles. So why do we not see these come standard in more cars? Second how much of a torque and hp increase can we expect in our V-6 Camaros with the air-raid cai?
__________________
_____________________________________________
Airaid CAI (V2 Tube)/ Flowmaster American Thunder/ Barton Shifter Kit/ Hotchkis Sport Sway Bars/ Hotchkis Sport Springs/ AAC Lights/ GM Trim Kit/ Tint/ Pioneer Premier Champion Series Sub/ Pioneer 1500 Watt Amp |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
2017 HyperBlue 2SS
|
AIRAID Intake System For 2010 3.6L V6 Camaro Features :
* High Flow Washable & Reusable Air Filter * Massive 4" Fully Engineered & Calibrated Modular Intake Tube * Easy Bolt-On Installation * Exclusive Lifetime "No-Hassle" Warranty! * Part # 250-242 | $329.90 * Add +11HP & +14 Ft.lbs/Torque over the factory air induction system! Taken from the following thread. http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=46138
__________________
]
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=30755 2010 IBM 2LT RS......Traded for..... 2012 IBM 2SS RS......Traded for..... 2017 HBM 2SS |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Red Brick of Vengeance!
Drives: 12 Second Brick Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
|
Quote:
here's the thread: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=48202 and the results: http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?k...=1&output=html Airaid showed a peak HP gain of 9.2 and a peak TQ gain of 5.9. Stock intake showed a IAT temp climb of 4 degrees (55 to 59 degrees) Airaid showed an IAT temp climb of 8 degrees (55 to 63 degrees) Stock fuel trim was -3%. Airaid fuel trim is 7%.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Red Brick of Vengeance!
Drives: 12 Second Brick Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
![]() Drives: CGM 2LT/RS M6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Littleton, CO.
Posts: 195
|
So after performing the IAT sensor relocate. Driving in heavy stop and go traffic. Heat builds up, and when the intake tube becomes heat soaked, the air is rushing by so quickly it does not have time to heat the air? Just wondering if the air might heat up on its way to the intake manifold, after the sensor read it at a lower temperature. Sounds like a great inexpensive mod!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
Red Brick of Vengeance!
Drives: 12 Second Brick Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
|
Quote:
The thing is the car's computer has the ability to adjust for a some error in these sensors... For example the fuel trims and knock sensors...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 251
|
Quote:
The Explanation would be that you are "Tricking" the computer into reading a cooler air intake temp, and that is going to cause issues with timing and can cause other problems down the road. The computer is also going to have to compensate for the improper reading. The Airaid is already breathing cooler air and feeding the cooler air into the IAT sensor and it's getting a proper reading from that. The Inlet air is moving through that tube so fast that "Heat soak" is not really going to be an issue. If a "Consumer" wants to do this mod, then that's up to them, however Airaid as a Manufacture does not recommend this modification. Thanks, David |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AirAid Cold Air Intake anyone? | FLYNNZL1 | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 12 | 01-01-2010 09:05 PM |
| Why RAM Air is a myth!!! Long Read (Wall of text) | live2well | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 80 | 11-02-2009 03:34 PM |
| Calling all Vendors with CAI's - PROVE Your CAI Gains! READ | JANNETTYRACING | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 618 | 10-20-2009 11:39 AM |
| Intake/ Air Cleaner observations and thoughts... (?V6/V8?) | radz28 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 27 | 01-23-2009 08:14 PM |
| Saturn Sky Red Line GMPP cold air intake question | 496BIGBLOCK | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 8 | 12-29-2008 01:50 AM |