Dyno....thoughts??? - Page 2 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

4xchamp · 04-17-2010, 05:00 PM

I dynoed on a 40 degree day with 93 Super at sea level . Some areas only have 91 octane available . I'll guess that'll lose 5 -10 hp .
What fuel did you run?

hambone3441 · 04-17-2010, 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4xchamp

I dynoed on a 40 degree day with 93 Super at sea level . Some areas only have 91 octane available . I'll guess that'll lose 5 -10 hp .
What fuel did you run?

93 octane

BackinBlackSS/RS · 04-17-2010, 07:50 PM

You really cannot compare dyno results from different dynos. There are WAY to many variables. Use the dyno to compare modifications and for tuning.

hambone3441 · 04-17-2010, 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BackinBlackSS/RS

You really cannot compare dyno results from different dynos. There are WAY to many variables. Use the dyno to compare modifications and for tuning.

Thats my plan, to take it back after adding my K&N cold air and Pypes catback exhaust....

Just wanted to see where my baseline stacked up..........ie on average, above, or below.

Jorux · 04-20-2010, 11:50 PM

Just throwing this out there for comments and what not. I just ran my 2SS Camaro on a Dyno Dynamics and got 336.1HP and 342 Torque as a baseline (Bone Stock), which seems on the low end of the typical. (not complaining or anything).

I mainly want to get feedback on the Air-Fuel results I got to see if this is what others are getting stock.

I will be getting a Dyno tune after I install my new headers and CAI in a couple weeks, so I'll just use for comparison.

hambone3441 · 04-21-2010, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jorux

Just throwing this out there for comments and what not. I just ran my 2SS Camaro on a Dyno Dynamics and got 336.1HP and 342 Torque as a baseline (Bone Stock), which seems on the low end of the typical. (not complaining or anything).

I mainly want to get feedback on the Air-Fuel results I got to see if this is what others are getting stock.

I will be getting a Dyno tune after I install my new headers and CAI in a couple weeks, so I'll just use for comparison.

Seems like we are in the same balpark on the Dyno Dynamics I put down 340.

JEFF2010SSMANUAL · 04-21-2010, 09:55 AM

I installed a Hushpower axelback exhaust, basically new mufflers, they are proven to add 8hp on the dyno. I am WAITING for my Cold Air Ind. CAI. Should I get it dyno-tuned after I install the CAI? Is it worth it? Will I really notice a diff? I have to drive almost 2 hours and spend a minimum of $250 to get it dyno tuned in Joilet, IL.

Sorry if its a silly question.

hambone3441 · 04-21-2010, 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JEFF2010SSMANUAL

I installed a Hushpower axelback exhaust, basically new mufflers, they are proven to add 8hp on the dyno. I am WAITING for my Cold Air Ind. CAI. Should I get it dyno-tuned after I install the CAI? Is it worth it? Will I really notice a diff? I have to drive almost 2 hours and spend a minimum of $250 to get it dyno tuned in Joilet, IL.

Sorry if its a silly question.

does sound a bit silly...dyno tuning will always take advantage and maximize the power output of your motor with the modifications you have done. Worth it, thats in the eye of the beholder I think. But you should always see the difference after a good dyno tune. Just my 2cents.

Bonemaro · 04-21-2010, 09:32 PM

I picked up a Cold Air Ind. CAI at C5fest from "the man" Ted and that piece adds 13 rwhp, 20 at the engine.

Roger Ramjet · 04-21-2010, 10:10 PM

Using the weather numbers on your graph I suspect the dyno operator was using the SAE correction factor. In my opinion it is the most accurate and repeatable method available. Using the same data and appling the STD correction factor the number would be 353.7 HP.

I always take my weather station to a dyno session, get a file of actual measured data, and do my own SAE correction calculations. That way I know what happened.

JEFF2010SSMANUAL · 04-22-2010, 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bonemaro

I picked up a Cold Air Ind. CAI at C5fest from "the man" Ted and that piece adds 13 rwhp, 20 at the engine.

Nice. I have waited 17 days now for my Cold Air Ind. CAI.

hambone3441 · 04-22-2010, 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roger Ramjet

Using the weather numbers on your graph I suspect the dyno operator was using the SAE correction factor. In my opinion it is the most accurate and repeatable method available. Using the same data and appling the STD correction factor the number would be 353.7 HP.

I always take my weather station to a dyno session, get a file of actual measured data, and do my own SAE correction calculations. That way I know what happened.

which dyno graph are you speaking to?

04-17-2010, 05:00 PM	#15
4xchamp MURC 666 Drives: 69 Pace Car 68 Camaro Restomod 81 Z Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: New England , U.S.A. Posts: 480	I dynoed on a 40 degree day with 93 Super at sea level . Some areas only have 91 octane available . I'll guess that'll lose 5 -10 hp . What fuel did you run? __________________ Guys hoarding their Camaros are depriving some youngster the opportunity to restore it 25 years from now . Drive it like you stole it , let the next guy baby it !

04-20-2010, 11:50 PM	#19
Jorux Drives: Red Jewel 2SS/RS Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Beavercreek, OH Posts: 15	Just throwing this out there for comments and what not. I just ran my 2SS Camaro on a Dyno Dynamics and got 336.1HP and 342 Torque as a baseline (Bone Stock), which seems on the low end of the typical. (not complaining or anything). I mainly want to get feedback on the Air-Fuel results I got to see if this is what others are getting stock. I will be getting a Dyno tune after I install my new headers and CAI in a couple weeks, so I'll just use for comparison. Attached Images

04-21-2010, 10:10 PM	#24
Roger Ramjet Motor Head Drives: CTS-V Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: So MD Posts: 494	Using the weather numbers on your graph I suspect the dyno operator was using the SAE correction factor. In my opinion it is the most accurate and repeatable method available. Using the same data and appling the STD correction factor the number would be 353.7 HP. I always take my weather station to a dyno session, get a file of actual measured data, and do my own SAE correction calculations. That way I know what happened. __________________ History Camaro's: 83, 93, 95, 98, & 10.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Roto-fab CAI dyno results	Roto-fab 1	Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons	102	07-30-2016 08:21 PM
Vararam CAI Testing on Dyno at England Green Racing (Pix, Vids, RESULTS!!!)	TAG UR IT	Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons	113	01-05-2011 04:32 PM
Scrming's Airaid and Injen Dyno results...	scrming	Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons	212	06-28-2010 04:28 PM
Camaro on the dyno today in Concord, NC!	topgun1	Camaro Photos \| Spyshots \| Video \| Media Gallery	6	03-19-2010 07:49 PM
SGOS's - L99 A6 Dyno results (after dyno tune)	SGOS252382	Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons	48	07-27-2009 02:13 PM

04-17-2010, 07:50 PM	#17
BackinBlackSS/RS Go Blue!!!!! Drives: 2012 Cruze LT Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Indiana Posts: 23,290	You really cannot compare dyno results from different dynos. There are WAY to many variables. Use the dyno to compare modifications and for tuning.

04-21-2010, 09:55 AM	#21
JEFF2010SSMANUAL JEFF2010SSMANUAL Drives: IOM 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Northern IL Posts: 1,953	I installed a Hushpower axelback exhaust, basically new mufflers, they are proven to add 8hp on the dyno. I am WAITING for my Cold Air Ind. CAI. Should I get it dyno-tuned after I install the CAI? Is it worth it? Will I really notice a diff? I have to drive almost 2 hours and spend a minimum of $250 to get it dyno tuned in Joilet, IL. Sorry if its a silly question.

04-21-2010, 09:32 PM	#23
Bonemaro Drives: 2010 RJT 1SS M6 Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Ann Arbor, Mi. Posts: 1,692 View My Garage	I picked up a Cold Air Ind. CAI at C5fest from "the man" Ted and that piece adds 13 rwhp, 20 at the engine.