![]() |
|
|
#29 |
![]() Drives: 1968 SS Camaro Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: saint petersburg florida
Posts: 10
|
Hey the idea of a supercharger for the v6 just sounds down right sick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
![]() Drives: 2003 Evo(450hp) , 95 CamaroZ28 Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 72
|
Definitely sounds sick. Let D3 know if you're interested. Of course this is there is still a GMC and a 2010 Camaro to buy come next spring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 1998 Camaro SS Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lancaster, CA
Posts: 1,115
|
I'm not in the market for a V6 Camaro, but I think an available supercharger would be sweet. I would think there would be more of a demand for a supercharger for the Camaro than a Cadillac.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 95 civic Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago Illinois
Posts: 5,796
|
idk I want a Super charger, but i dont want to lose any mpgs
help?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
![]() Drives: 2014 Mustang Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 642
|
Quote:
Hell, you'd probly gain some MPG's with a good turbo setup. I'm sure with the efficiency of most new superchargers you'd gain some aswell. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Enlightened
Drives: Nothing Currently Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Yes, that's my real name.
Drives: 2005 LS2 600hp GTO Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ventura, ca.
Posts: 770
|
mine jumped from 20 mpg to 22.7 mpg adding the Maggie 112HH.
__________________
Magnuson 112HH supercharger at 7.5 psi (Virtual 9.0 liter) 600hp 1 of 2 torrid/red int /A4/05 555r 275/40/R17's Nitto Extreme Drags 1.7 60 ft Car runs high 11's No other mods. I got the first 112HH Magnuson blower ported for a GTO. Now it appears it was also one of the last....
![]() http://www.ribbonprinting.com http://www.personalizedawarenessribbons.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 95 civic Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago Illinois
Posts: 5,796
|
hmmm i see
![]() Im leaning to the supercharger side now
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Yes, that's my real name.
Drives: 2005 LS2 600hp GTO Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ventura, ca.
Posts: 770
|
Magnuson offers a third party warranty on drive line components with the purchase of a maggie...I think it's like 300 bucks...but you can't customize the tune.
__________________
Magnuson 112HH supercharger at 7.5 psi (Virtual 9.0 liter) 600hp 1 of 2 torrid/red int /A4/05 555r 275/40/R17's Nitto Extreme Drags 1.7 60 ft Car runs high 11's No other mods. I got the first 112HH Magnuson blower ported for a GTO. Now it appears it was also one of the last....
![]() http://www.ribbonprinting.com http://www.personalizedawarenessribbons.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Kewl sounds like the way to go on that Holden
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
![]() Drives: Fast Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 24
|
An FYI.
The 2JZGE and 2JZ-GTE in the Supra aren't forged. As far as forced induction goes on the 3.6DI. The issue here is two fold, getting the mechanical pump to flow enough fuel needed for much higher power levels, and of course the compression. You could run E-85 and tune it, but you'd definately require an entire fuel system upgrade which is very difficult. Not because of the drying effects of alcohol, but because of the sheer volume needed. If you wanted to run leaded race gas and get rid of the cats, you could easily run over 500WHP on the DI v6. I've spoken to the engineers and the rods and pins are similar weight to the non DI 255 horse 3.6 counterpart, but they are far stronger, and that 3.6 bottom end in the non DI is no joke. Trying to run boost on pump gas is pretty asinine. Direct injection typically allows a little over 1.0:1 in extra compression with the knock characteristics of a motor running over a full point of compression. Ex. Port fuel compression motor with a static CR of 10.3:1 The Direct Injection version would have compression of 11.3:1 and still exhibit knock characteristics of the 10.3:1 compression counterpart. So thats very very good. It's just that 10.3:1 is quite high for boost, and you'd be pulling a LOT of timing to get some boost in that sucker, which would cause EGTS to sky rocket. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
But knock shouldn't even be an issue, right? The Direct Injection system shoots gas into the cylinder right at the end-portion of the compression stroke. It cools the now-compressed air, and VERY shortly thereafter, ignites.
I guess I imagine the larger issue would be how much boost the head gaskets can handle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
![]() Drives: 96 Bronco w/ a 5 speed Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: PNW
Posts: 296
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Camaro Laws | ChevyNut | Off-topic Discussions | 107 | 11-09-2016 06:40 PM |
| A Message to all Fbody Enthusiasts | TAG UR IT | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 12 | 02-02-2013 08:41 PM |
| GM memo to dealers | Moose | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 41 | 02-04-2010 08:33 PM |
| CNN: Camaro: From sketchpad to street - The rebirth of a muscle car ... | Gatecrasher | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 49 | 10-05-2009 04:33 PM |
| 4 SEMA CAMAROS finally unveiled by GM! (hi-res images & details) | FenwickHockey65 | Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery | 237 | 11-03-2008 11:39 PM |