Camaro VS Mustang Mega Thread - Page 81 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

a_Username · 08-24-2010, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ViperTomcat

I wasnt aware of the WHP difference! I second the .2-.3 prediction.

Also, the fastest stock 2010 GT time that I have seen, with my own eyes, was at Sonoma Raceway in California. A bone-stock GT hooked up perfectly and ran a 12.9 @ 106.4 MPH.

Wow the 2010 GTs FINALLY broke 12s lol. That 12.9 is all it will see though...

big hammer · 08-24-2010, 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1

Im not sure I would call it only a tenth difference with both hooking equal.

10 Gt dynos about 20whp less than an ls1 on average and is about ~200 lbs heavier.

I would say the difference is about .2-.3 tenths. Still a drivers race.

I know the best 4th gen time is about 12.8 (some have claimed 12.7 but I doubt it). What is the best 10GT time stock to date?...13 flat is what I have in my memory but I could be wrong. The ls1 cars have also trapped up to 109...I think the GT is up to about 106 max.

Definitely a good race.

word.

they are a very good race 0-60 but then the ls1 starts to take over and never looks back.

THE EVIL TW1N · 08-24-2010, 08:47 PM

its a good race with the advantage going to the LS1. The 4.6SOHC can only do so much, it aint the 5.0!

All-Or-Nothing · 08-24-2010, 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Blur

If we keep going down this path, I'm going to merge this one, too!

I'm just saying.......we can have a thread about the best steaks and what restaraunt and it will somehow wind up that there was a Mustang and Camaro in the parking lot and go down hill from there.

Merge Away

motorhead · 08-24-2010, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Blur

If we keep going down this path, I'm going to merge this one, too!

better yet, delete it.

2010 SSRS · 08-24-2010, 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by motorhead

better yet, delete it.

I agree, delete all mustang threads.

lil_chef · 08-24-2010, 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ViperTomcat

It does. The 2002 SS was 3400 lbs and had around 340-350 real HP. Its around 150-200 pounds lighter and has more torque and HP.

With equal drivers and conditions..the 2002 Camaro SS wins by a tenth, maybe a bit less or more.

FWIW i weighed my premium stang when it was stock and it came in at 3503 LB

ULTRAZLS1 · 08-24-2010, 11:32 PM

FWIW, when I had my H/C 98 z28 weighed at exotic performance plus in 2006 before the dyno tune it was 3297 with about 1/3 tank of fuel.

8cd03gro · 08-25-2010, 01:01 AM

It's not that much of a drivers race guys. Yes, it will come down to the driver, but 9/10 the SS will win. It has a power AND weight advantage. The average "good" ls1 run I see at the track is a lowish 13(13.2-13.3). The average "good" 3v run I see is a mid-high 13 (13.6-13.7) If it goes to high speeds, the 3v is gonna get a womping.

Sax1031 · 08-25-2010, 01:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 8cd03gro

It's not that much of a drivers race guys. Yes, it will come down to the driver, but 9/10 the SS will win. It has a power AND weight advantage. The average "good" ls1 run I see at the track is a lowish 13(13.2-13.3). The average "good" 3v run I see is a mid-high 13 (13.6-13.7) If it goes to high speeds, the 3v is gonna get a womping.

I agree that equally driven the LS1 wins 90% of the time.

big hammer · 08-25-2010, 09:21 AM

it went sour after a fanboi claimed that disregarding the platform they're in, the ls3 has got nothin on the 5.0

Americanmuscle11 · 08-25-2010, 09:54 AM

You can delete this thread. Just wanted to find the original.

Huggerorange73 · 08-25-2010, 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2010 SSRS

I agree, delete all mustang threads.

This

ULTRAZLS1 · 08-25-2010, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sax1031

I agree that equally driven the LS1 wins 90% of the time.

If the LS1 is faster it would win 100% of the time if they are equally driven...

08-25-2010, 09:21 AM	#1131
big hammer Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: manitoba Posts: 1,202	it went sour after a fanboi claimed that disregarding the platform they're in, the ls3 has got nothin on the 5.0 __________________ Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Poll -- Camaro vs Mustang Supercar Shootout	JusticePete	Suspension / Brakes / Chassis	105	10-09-2013 03:18 PM
Does the v6 have enough power?	cstproductions	Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons	305	08-29-2012 10:27 PM
Winner, winner - Jalopnik compares the Big 3	Number 3	5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions	31	04-17-2011 04:24 PM
Im sure this has been asked before.. But forgive my innocence :)	gmag21	Suspension / Brakes / Chassis	23	02-21-2010 11:29 PM
The DEFINITIVE EXPLANATION OF CAMARO SUSPENSION, ISSUES, AND UPGRADES	Info@PeddersUSA.com	Suspension / Brakes / Chassis	106	10-19-2009 07:08 PM

08-24-2010, 08:47 PM	#1123
THE EVIL TW1N Banned Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: CA Posts: 2,925	its a good race with the advantage going to the LS1. The 4.6SOHC can only do so much, it aint the 5.0!

08-24-2010, 11:32 PM	#1128
ULTRAZLS1 Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Jackson, Michigan Posts: 4,418	FWIW, when I had my H/C 98 z28 weighed at exotic performance plus in 2006 before the dyno tune it was 3297 with about 1/3 tank of fuel.

08-25-2010, 01:01 AM	#1129
8cd03gro Drives: 2005 STi corn fed Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Colorado Posts: 2,997	It's not that much of a drivers race guys. Yes, it will come down to the driver, but 9/10 the SS will win. It has a power AND weight advantage. The average "good" ls1 run I see at the track is a lowish 13(13.2-13.3). The average "good" 3v run I see is a mid-high 13 (13.6-13.7) If it goes to high speeds, the 3v is gonna get a womping.

08-25-2010, 09:54 AM	#1132
Americanmuscle11 Drives: car Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: nowhere Posts: 71	You can delete this thread. Just wanted to find the original.