![]() |
|
|
#43 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '10 Camaro SS Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
Posts: 1,047
|
Quote:
![]() For KB $$
__________________
2010, SIM, 2SS/RS, LS3, CGM Stripes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
![]() |
. This statement proves that you have absolutely nothing to provide on this topic, and have mearly resorted to childish tactics. Being that I openly said I didnt even approve of KB's IAT's, shows, that unlike you, I only side with a company when it has merit, and factual data. I dont just attack in the hope of getting in the good graces of a company. But if you choose to continue, its fine by us. Fortunately, the Camaro guys tend to lean more on the technically inclined side. Obviously, based on the previous statement from GMRULZ, Whipple has decided that THEY TO feel that having all of the proper data for their customers is the best way to go. Hats off to them, as it will help their customers immensly. It will also, without question, result in higher overall power; Because it will allow more timing to be run in their main table. Regardless of what the IAT's are, ALL competent tuners can tune accordingly. So its really a mute point. As a car enthusiest first, I am excited to see the results of their kit. Contrary to your belief, I think it is an EXCELLENT design, and has its place among the very best blowers on the market. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '10 Camaro SS Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
Posts: 1,047
|
I have been on this site long enough to see where your allegiances lay. Why not start your own thread for IAT's and you can toot your horn and be a keyboard commander all you want for KB? Maybe pick up some more donations while your at it?
__________________
2010, SIM, 2SS/RS, LS3, CGM Stripes
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Maggie blown LS3 vette Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SE TX
Posts: 1,490
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
![]() |
You know what. Im gonna stop right here. Because you crossed a line that can get people hurt if their ever seen. To toss insults at a mans dying wife, and the donations she is receiving....WOW.. Thats low.
So you have said your peace, and I wont be responding anymore. I dont want to do something that is regretted later. Have a good day. |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Down South
Posts: 1,497
|
I appreciate sound information and it seems to me the previous posts are giving correct info regardless of what they sell. You can always check with other companies to get their take on things.
This week I was calling around looking for a good tuner because the Camaro is going to get boosted while keeping the nitrous. When I told one tuner about using nitrous he suggested the IAT trick. It is a resister used to trick the ECM into thinking the air is hot(200+) when the nitrous in activated so you can pull timing in those areas. It has been used for years on the LSX. Problem is if the pump in your w/a i/c goes out your IAT's will be high but the ECM will not know. Consequently the ECM would pull the timing for the nitrous but not any additional timing for the hot air so it could detonate. You shouldn't because the nitrous should cool the intake charge but why take the risk. If you just have the sensor before the air goes into the motor then it is getting an accurate reading. BTW, I will be using an a/a i/c so I can't have a pump go bad and using a tt instead of sc but the correct IAT info is still very important in the tuning.
__________________
2005 Dodge Ram 2500 RCSB Thunder Road Hemi Sport w/STS Turbo
2004 Dodge Ram SRT-10 - Silver - Stock 2003 Chevy 1500 RCSB Stepside 400SS - 408 in now awaiting Turbo |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
![]() |
Correct.. Especially, since we were not selling, or promoting ANY company. This is mearly information provided by a tuner who deals with this for a living.
Every time I post in a S/C thread, does not need to turn into a "Your just saying that because you sell KB thread." This has NOTHING to do with KB. It is mearly a discussion regarding IAT's. There is no reason to turn this into something its not. Its not about our shop, or anything involving us. But if my experience can help someone, then I will take the time to post it up. We've stopped involving or our shop in what blower is better discussions. It always turns bad. We have chosen to break off from KB only, and no longer wish to involve ourselves in those types of debates. Last edited by Total_Perf_Eng; 11-18-2010 at 06:28 PM. Reason: Wording |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 2SS/RS , 2011 C6 Base Corvette Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Naples Florida
Posts: 774
|
Quote:
__________________
SUICIDE BY RACECAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
![]() |
No prob.. It works great on the rubber hoses, and barbed fittings as well. But most importantly, you can spray it on the intake manifold gaskets, and they will slide on the head surface without tearing or rolling. If you spray to much, it just evaporates. Unlike WD40, that just gets messy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Red SS/RS Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lake Jackson, TX
Posts: 476
|
Maybe I can simplify this from strictly an engineering perspective.
The IAT at the air box determines the mass floww of air. The temperature after the intercooler determines the volume flow of air into the cylinders. The lower the temperature the lower the volumetric flow rate. Since the blower is positive displacement and the cylinder volume is fixed, the intercooler outlet temperature sets the blower discharge pressure. All things being equal, lowering air charge temperature to the cylinders will produce the same horsepower with less boost pressure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
![]() Drives: 03' Silverado SS/ TBSS 06' Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 64
|
So I wonder if any one ever installed an IAT in the Whipple manifold to get a true IAt reading on how great the Whipple really is on the IAT temps?
__________________
03' Silverado SS
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Anyone who would install/tune a whipple without relocating the IAT should be shot on the spot
![]() This is a picture from the setup we just finished. ![]() ![]() IAT's were about 8-12 degrees cooler than a Maggy at a boost level 1-2psi higher than what we usually run on the Maggy setup. Of course the sensor is in a slightly different location so it is not a 110% accurate measure. Plain and simple the Whipple is a larger blower, so it is more efficient and it will make less heat. |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 | |
|
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 143
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 143
|
Here you go guys, run on the dyno, this is a modified 6.2L Escalade motor. Custom cam, ported heads and dyno headers. The IAT2 temp shows 15-20deg F over the cell temp. This was with the GM 3/8" NPT screw in style sensor which reads a bit higher since it picks up manifold/head temp from the threads.
http://pdfcast.org/pdf/whipple-175ax...c-dyno-results http://pdfcast.org/pdf/whipple-sc-dyno-results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Minimum HP for 200mph | Christiancoach | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 30 | 06-13-2017 06:58 PM |
| Is anyone a police officer??? | HarrisraTx | Off-topic Discussions | 49 | 01-04-2012 07:32 AM |
| THE FIRST PRODUCTION WHIPPLE INSTALL STARTED | tandtperformance | Forced Induction - V8 | 520 | 02-04-2011 10:59 PM |
| Top Mount Decision- TVS2300, KB, Whipple | thekid96 | Forced Induction - V8 | 106 | 03-03-2010 11:37 AM |
| Former task force head bullish on GM, Chrysler | ShnOmac | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 0 | 10-21-2009 09:06 PM |