Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-18-2010, 02:47 AM   #43
DarricSS

 
DarricSS's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 Camaro SS
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
Posts: 1,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Total_Perf_Eng View Post
Suggestion..

Take a look at a few of the other LS tech sites. There are 2 or 3 that have a huge technical section. One LS1Tech style website comes to mind that has more technical information that many people could even process.

Wander over there, and look up IAT information. Read up on how important this field is, in tuning. On the E38, E67, E36, and E40 PCM's, there is only 1 IAT field. (The Gen 5 Camaro is an E38) See how important these temps are in relation to tuning certain parameters in their proper location.

ATI Procharger, Paxton, Vortech, Kenne Bell, Magnacharger, Rotex, PSI, Eaton, Turbonetics, TTi, and Granatelli, ALL read the IAT's, post Poweradder (turbo or supercharger). This is not some "Blowhard" touting any specific blower, or discrediting any specific blower. This is mearly FACT.

No one is saying any one company is "Bad". But being as this is a "Discussion Forum", there is nothing wrong with having a discussion regarding IAT's on different blowers. Trust me, ive been dealing with KB for many years. We have been questioned 1000's of times regarding IAT's. Some have been off the charts. So im in no way saying KB is better. I personally have battled 200* IAT's in the past on previous edition KB's, before we figured out what worked. So I will NEVER say the KB has great IAT's. Cause they dont. NO top mount supercharger does. They all are too high if you ask me..

As a tuner, we have tested virtually every road going supercharger. To include the new Edelbrock, and Whipple. Both, which I might add are very nice systems. Almost every supercharger, has IAT's within 10* of ambiant on the vacuum side of the blower, at the air filter/MAF (provided it is capable of accessing fresh air). Why?? Cause its ambiant.. Its nothing more than the temps you are reading from the fresh air that the car is getting. Now, lets talk about the new Procharger. Are you gonna see 10* above ambient on that one? Of course not, because the air is being pulled from above the exhaust manifold. But fortunately, they have an extremely efficient air to air intercooler that is able to pull that heat out, and get the IAT's within a very acceptable range.

Example: Say your electric intercooler pump fails. You now, no longer have ANY intercooling. Your IAT's jump to 250*. Yet your car is running around thinking you've got 85* IAT's, so its commanding 100% timing; when in reality it should be pulling 7-15*. Of course youve got an IAT vs fuel modifier that starts dumping fuel into the motor, desperately trying to cool itself off, and slow the flame speed down; but its STILL commanding full timing. As I said, you have ZERO control. If you had that EXACT scenario, with the "Post Blower" IAT's, the PCM would see the spike, and it would start to pull timing. If it didnt come down, the spark would be so low, and the fuel so rich, that your motor would be completely safe. It would only make 50% of its power, but it would be COMPLETELY safe.

Boost generates heat. Its not a myth. It is a fact. A fact that every supercharger company on the planet has had to battle.

Again, nothing is being said bad, mean, vindictive, or bias, about anyone. This is mearly a discussion regarding IAT's

FWIW, GM reads the IAT's post blower on the ZR1, and the CTS-V. They will also read post blower on the supercharged Z28.


P.S. Unpaid blowhards, are still blowhards.. At least the "Paid" blowhard is a money wh**e. Whereas the "Unpaid" blowhard, is just a loud mouth S!*t.. Just kidding around.
Everyone reading the thread for a Discussion on Whipple and Edelbrock...thanks for once again turning the thread into a:


For KB $$
__________________
2010, SIM, 2SS/RS, LS3, CGM Stripes
DarricSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 02:50 PM   #44
Total_Perf_Eng
 
Total_Perf_Eng's Avatar
 
Drives: Corvette
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 509
Send a message via AIM to Total_Perf_Eng
. This statement proves that you have absolutely nothing to provide on this topic, and have mearly resorted to childish tactics.
Being that I openly said I didnt even approve of KB's IAT's, shows, that unlike you, I only side with a company when it has merit, and factual data. I dont just attack in the hope of getting in the good graces of a company. But if you choose to continue, its fine by us. Fortunately, the Camaro guys tend to lean more on the technically inclined side.

Obviously, based on the previous statement from GMRULZ, Whipple has decided that THEY TO feel that having all of the proper data for their customers is the best way to go. Hats off to them, as it will help their customers immensly. It will also, without question, result in higher overall power; Because it will allow more timing to be run in their main table.

Regardless of what the IAT's are, ALL competent tuners can tune accordingly. So its really a mute point.
As a car enthusiest first, I am excited to see the results of their kit. Contrary to your belief, I think it is an EXCELLENT design, and has its place among the very best blowers on the market.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarricSS View Post
Everyone reading the thread for a Discussion on Whipple and Edelbrock...thanks for once again turning the thread into a:


For KB $$
Total_Perf_Eng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 04:43 PM   #45
DarricSS

 
DarricSS's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 Camaro SS
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
Posts: 1,047
I have been on this site long enough to see where your allegiances lay. Why not start your own thread for IAT's and you can toot your horn and be a keyboard commander all you want for KB? Maybe pick up some more donations while your at it?
__________________
2010, SIM, 2SS/RS, LS3, CGM Stripes
DarricSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 04:56 PM   #46
old motorhead

 
Drives: Maggie blown LS3 vette
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SE TX
Posts: 1,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarricSS View Post
I have been on this site long enough to see where your allegiances lay. Why not start your own thread for IAT's and you can toot your horn and be a keyboard commander all you want for KB? Maybe pick up some more donations while your at it?
Now that's over the line, crass, and uncalled for. You should win a prize for that post
old motorhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 05:23 PM   #47
Total_Perf_Eng
 
Total_Perf_Eng's Avatar
 
Drives: Corvette
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 509
Send a message via AIM to Total_Perf_Eng
You know what. Im gonna stop right here. Because you crossed a line that can get people hurt if their ever seen. To toss insults at a mans dying wife, and the donations she is receiving....WOW.. Thats low.

So you have said your peace, and I wont be responding anymore. I dont want to do something that is regretted later. Have a good day.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarricSS View Post
I have been on this site long enough to see where your allegiances lay. Why not start your own thread for IAT's and you can toot your horn and be a keyboard commander all you want for KB? Maybe pick up some more donations while your at it?
Total_Perf_Eng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 05:33 PM   #48
SRT10KLLR

 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Down South
Posts: 1,497
I appreciate sound information and it seems to me the previous posts are giving correct info regardless of what they sell. You can always check with other companies to get their take on things.

This week I was calling around looking for a good tuner because the Camaro is going to get boosted while keeping the nitrous. When I told one tuner about using nitrous he suggested the IAT trick. It is a resister used to trick the ECM into thinking the air is hot(200+) when the nitrous in activated so you can pull timing in those areas. It has been used for years on the LSX. Problem is if the pump in your w/a i/c goes out your IAT's will be high but the ECM will not know. Consequently the ECM would pull the timing for the nitrous but not any additional timing for the hot air so it could detonate. You shouldn't because the nitrous should cool the intake charge but why take the risk.

If you just have the sensor before the air goes into the motor then it is getting an accurate reading.


BTW, I will be using an a/a i/c so I can't have a pump go bad and using a tt instead of sc but the correct IAT info is still very important in the tuning.
__________________
2005 Dodge Ram 2500 RCSB Thunder Road Hemi Sport w/STS Turbo
2004 Dodge Ram SRT-10 - Silver - Stock
2003 Chevy 1500 RCSB Stepside 400SS - 408 in now awaiting Turbo
SRT10KLLR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 06:01 PM   #49
Total_Perf_Eng
 
Total_Perf_Eng's Avatar
 
Drives: Corvette
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 509
Send a message via AIM to Total_Perf_Eng
Correct.. Especially, since we were not selling, or promoting ANY company. This is mearly information provided by a tuner who deals with this for a living.

Every time I post in a S/C thread, does not need to turn into a "Your just saying that because you sell KB thread." This has NOTHING to do with KB. It is mearly a discussion regarding IAT's. There is no reason to turn this into something its not. Its not about our shop, or anything involving us. But if my experience can help someone, then I will take the time to post it up. We've stopped involving or our shop in what blower is better discussions. It always turns bad. We have chosen to break off from KB only, and no longer wish to involve ourselves in those types of debates.


Quote:
Originally Posted by SRT10KLLR View Post
I appreciate sound information and it seems to me the previous posts are giving correct info regardless of what they sell. You can always check with other companies to get their take on things.

Last edited by Total_Perf_Eng; 11-18-2010 at 06:28 PM. Reason: Wording
Total_Perf_Eng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 08:51 PM   #50
Bad Dad

 
Bad Dad's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS , 2011 C6 Base Corvette
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Naples Florida
Posts: 774
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Total_Perf_Eng View Post
We like to use that spray silicone that evaporates. It works REALLY well for that type of stuff.
THANK YOU I work alot and want to get everything togeather before i start going to take my time i have found out being a perfectionist is not a bad thing at all no matter what the subject...
__________________


SUICIDE BY RACECAR
Bad Dad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 11:14 PM   #51
Total_Perf_Eng
 
Total_Perf_Eng's Avatar
 
Drives: Corvette
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 509
Send a message via AIM to Total_Perf_Eng
No prob.. It works great on the rubber hoses, and barbed fittings as well. But most importantly, you can spray it on the intake manifold gaskets, and they will slide on the head surface without tearing or rolling. If you spray to much, it just evaporates. Unlike WD40, that just gets messy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad Dad View Post
THANK YOU I work alot and want to get everything togeather before i start going to take my time i have found out being a perfectionist is not a bad thing at all no matter what the subject...
Total_Perf_Eng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 12:27 PM   #52
Duke
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Red SS/RS
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lake Jackson, TX
Posts: 476
Maybe I can simplify this from strictly an engineering perspective.

The IAT at the air box determines the mass floww of air. The temperature after the intercooler determines the volume flow of air into the cylinders. The lower the temperature the lower the volumetric flow rate. Since the blower is positive displacement and the cylinder volume is fixed, the intercooler outlet temperature sets the blower discharge pressure.

All things being equal, lowering air charge temperature to the cylinders will produce the same horsepower with less boost pressure.
Duke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2011, 09:56 PM   #53
03ss
 
Drives: 03' Silverado SS/ TBSS 06'
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 64
So I wonder if any one ever installed an IAT in the Whipple manifold to get a true IAt reading on how great the Whipple really is on the IAT temps?
__________________
03' Silverado SS
03ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2011, 11:19 AM   #54
Meister@Torq

 
Drives: 2001 Crown Vic
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 974
Send a message via AIM to Meister@Torq Send a message via MSN to Meister@Torq
Anyone who would install/tune a whipple without relocating the IAT should be shot on the spot

This is a picture from the setup we just finished.




IAT's were about 8-12 degrees cooler than a Maggy at a boost level 1-2psi higher than what we usually run on the Maggy setup. Of course the sensor is in a slightly different location so it is not a 110% accurate measure.

Plain and simple the Whipple is a larger blower, so it is more efficient and it will make less heat.
Meister@Torq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2011, 02:52 PM   #55
Whipple Charged
 
Whipple Charged's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meister@Torq View Post
Anyone who would install/tune a whipple without relocating the IAT should be shot on the spot

This is a picture from the setup we just finished.




IAT's were about 8-12 degrees cooler than a Maggy at a boost level 1-2psi higher than what we usually run on the Maggy setup. Of course the sensor is in a slightly different location so it is not a 110% accurate measure.

Plain and simple the Whipple is a larger blower, so it is more efficient and it will make less heat.
Thanks for the post. This sensor, when used with the stock transfer function reads slightly higher then the grommet style sensor. During testing, this sensor read between 10-20deg F hotter then the grommet style sensor that Magnusson and some other use.
Whipple Charged is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2011, 01:45 PM   #56
Whipple Charged
 
Whipple Charged's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 143
Here you go guys, run on the dyno, this is a modified 6.2L Escalade motor. Custom cam, ported heads and dyno headers. The IAT2 temp shows 15-20deg F over the cell temp. This was with the GM 3/8" NPT screw in style sensor which reads a bit higher since it picks up manifold/head temp from the threads.

http://pdfcast.org/pdf/whipple-175ax...c-dyno-results

http://pdfcast.org/pdf/whipple-sc-dyno-results
Whipple Charged is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Minimum HP for 200mph Christiancoach General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 30 06-13-2017 06:58 PM
Is anyone a police officer??? HarrisraTx Off-topic Discussions 49 01-04-2012 07:32 AM
THE FIRST PRODUCTION WHIPPLE INSTALL STARTED tandtperformance Forced Induction - V8 520 02-04-2011 10:59 PM
Top Mount Decision- TVS2300, KB, Whipple thekid96 Forced Induction - V8 106 03-03-2010 11:37 AM
Former task force head bullish on GM, Chrysler ShnOmac General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 0 10-21-2009 09:06 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.