Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Chevy Camaro vs...


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-06-2011, 11:46 AM   #3109
mcdoogle6969

 
mcdoogle6969's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS, 2008 Heritage 300C
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by 28. View Post
He did say "maybe I don't know where to look" on there..
I can type in 2010 Camaro Cold Air intake on Google for instance and find all kinds....Didn't know Google was that hard to use.
mcdoogle6969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 11:46 AM   #3110
GMRULZ

 
GMRULZ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS & 2008 C6
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 1,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by wbt View Post
Dyno'd my car a couple of weeks ago.

429whp
376wtq

Mods:
Tune
Airaid CAI
O/R x-pipe
BBK shorties

Installed the Boss intake this week and will be going to re-dyno on 3/12.


Wow! Very impressive numbers! Like others said love to see the cmparrison.
__________________
2010 SS L99, 536rwhp 10.843@126.72. Whipple Supercharger stock pulley, ARH 1 7/8 longtubes w/ catted xpipe, magnaflow 3" mufflers, ADM Race CAI, 3:70 gears, lightweight wheels and nitto drag radials. Stock internal L99, stock converter.

Bolt on best before blower 12.22@113.29 w/ nothing but ARH headers, catted x-pipe, ADM CAI and a tune on stock Pzero`s!

Other car 2008 C6 Ls3, z51, A6, Npp Exhaust, best bonestock pass 11.80@118.82, Number 2 on the Corvette Forums Bonestock fastest list..
GMRULZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 11:55 AM   #3111
GMRULZ

 
GMRULZ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS & 2008 C6
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 1,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by KungFuHamster View Post
i just went back and re-read your edited post...so theres our explanation, and it makes sense.

but im still in agreement with you...more fuel system to run 93? yeah...no. stick with the good stuff. but im pretty surprised the car is holding up as well as it is...one of those rods are gonna let go soon i imagine.
Yep. I just wish our cut and paster had cut and pasted the whole post so i would not have jumped to conclusions...lol..

If they have a good conservative tune on it it may go a while even w/ those rods. If I was them i would slap a converter in it and go get that 9 second stock internal pass! would be
__________________
2010 SS L99, 536rwhp 10.843@126.72. Whipple Supercharger stock pulley, ARH 1 7/8 longtubes w/ catted xpipe, magnaflow 3" mufflers, ADM Race CAI, 3:70 gears, lightweight wheels and nitto drag radials. Stock internal L99, stock converter.

Bolt on best before blower 12.22@113.29 w/ nothing but ARH headers, catted x-pipe, ADM CAI and a tune on stock Pzero`s!

Other car 2008 C6 Ls3, z51, A6, Npp Exhaust, best bonestock pass 11.80@118.82, Number 2 on the Corvette Forums Bonestock fastest list..
GMRULZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 07:44 PM   #3112
ParisTNDude
Owning SSes for 50 Years
 
ParisTNDude's Avatar
 
Drives: Sharkskin Grey LT1
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Paris, TN
Posts: 3,139
Roush Mustang

Quote:
Originally Posted by porcupinekiller View Post
VMP Tuning 2011 5.0 automatic Roush S/C Mustang 10.00 at 138 mph.


Very nice times! I wondered what the bone stock Roush kit would run so I went to the Mustang 5.0 & Fast Fords Magazine at: http://www.mustang50magazine.com/fea..._facility.html
And it looks like their best times were right at 11.70 ET at 120MPH with DOT drag radials. With the base price of one of these things being $47K (their vehicle was at $57K), I would hope you could easily take a Camaro to that level of performance for an additional $12-15K. I can't imagine what the guy in this 10 second video has in his car with the mods mentioned. Money buys performance as many Camaro5 guys can attest.
__________________
The new ride: 2023 Camaro, LT1, Sharkskin Grey

Previous Performance Cars:

1966 Chevelle SS 4M, 2010 Corvette 6M
1968 Dodge Charger R/T Auto 2012 1SS 6M
1982 Corvette Auto 2010 1SS 6A
1984 Corvette Auto 2016 2SS 8A
1999 Camaro Auto 2017 HBM 1SS 1le
2002 C5 Corvette 6M 2018 2SS
2006 Corvette Auto 2023 Camaro LT1
ParisTNDude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 07:58 PM   #3113
BigDan

 
Drives: bug
Join Date: May 2009
Location: nv
Posts: 1,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by ParisTNDude View Post
Very nice times! I wondered what the bone stock Roush kit would run so I went to the Mustang 5.0 & Fast Fords Magazine at: http://www.mustang50magazine.com/fea..._facility.html
And it looks like their best times were right at 11.70 ET at 120MPH with DOT drag radials. With the base price of one of these things being $47K (their vehicle was at $57K), I would hope you could easily take a Camaro to that level of performance for an additional $12-15K. I can't imagine what the guy in this 10 second video has in his car with the mods mentioned. Money buys performance as many Camaro5 guys can attest.
Muscle Mustang's and Fast Ford magazine got 11.40@124.9 with their 2010 4.6L Roush stage 3 on stickies and 11.57@124.78 on stock tires. Its a fully forged 4.6L with a 2.3L TVS on top running at 15lbs and dyno's in the 530whp range. I think someone has gone 11.2 with one now which is cool from a stock production car with a full warranty. It sucks that they arnt doing the same for the current 5.0L. All they are doing is bolting on a ford racing supercharger and calling it a day like the old stage 2. Hopefully in the years to come he will pull the new 5.0L engine and stuff it full of forged bottom parts and high flow parts up top and make 700+ since the FRPP Whipple already has a 625hp low boost factory set up.

http://www.musclemustangfastfords.co...e_3/index.html
BigDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 08:01 PM   #3114
8cd03gro


 
Drives: 2005 STi corn fed
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,997
Quote:
Originally Posted by ParisTNDude View Post
Very nice times! I wondered what the bone stock Roush kit would run so I went to the Mustang 5.0 & Fast Fords Magazine at: http://www.mustang50magazine.com/fea..._facility.html
And it looks like their best times were right at 11.70 ET at 120MPH with DOT drag radials. With the base price of one of these things being $47K (their vehicle was at $57K), I would hope you could easily take a Camaro to that level of performance for an additional $12-15K. I can't imagine what the guy in this 10 second video has in his car with the mods mentioned. Money buys performance as many Camaro5 guys can attest.
He's running the same roush 2.3l blower with a smaller pulley for more boost and a dyno tune with some sticky tires. That's it.
8cd03gro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 10:13 PM   #3115
JUISSD

 
JUISSD's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 White/IOM 2SS/RS M6
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by ffrcobra_65 View Post
As one who owns a SuperCharged 2010 SS and a 2011 GT500, IMHO, the 5.0 is a better buy..... lighter, faster, even better with the 3.73 gears.
That all depends on why you're buying the car. Yes the GT is faster, but that doesn't necessarily make it a better buy.

Quote:
The 5th gen camaro is still new, so it still gets more looks but that will change in time, sooner than later. 90% of the people who admire the Camaro do so because of the Transformers movie. I know this because when I drive my Camaro, people who ask, stare, comment about the car are young (mostly teens, kids, women) and the type that I wouldn't consider, "car people." On the other hand, people who approach and comment on my "Mustang" are the "car type" people.
I've had all kinds of different people approach me and ask about my car. Just about every time I drive it. Some are casual observers, but a lot of them are "car guys." Regardless, I didn't buy it for anyone else but me.

Quote:
Despite of its solid axle, I feel the 2011 Mustang Gt (one I test drove) actually handles better than the SS. I always test drive in the Santa Monica Mountains, 10 miles from my work and dealerships.
The GT definitely handles a bit better, but that's based almost solely on it's lighter weight.

Quote:
The cam5 5th gen forum is very active now because again, the car is new. Just like the Mustang GT forums are starting to get busy again.
What I really dislike about the 5th Gen Camaro....the weight and soft suspension.
The Camaro is not a flash in the pan if that's what you're implying. The enthusiasm for the car will remain strong for a long time to come.
__________________
2010 White/IOM Camaro 2SS/RS M6


JUISSD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2011, 05:24 AM   #3116
porcupinekiller
 
porcupinekiller's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 GT500
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Posts: 662
Quote:
Originally Posted by KungFuHamster View Post
well the vid says that the car has a stock motor, trans and converter.
but it also says it has exhaust and suspension work. so theres your 60ft right there. remember, the 6sp auto in these cars have a nasty, almost granny low 1st, so its gonna 60ft good if the hook is there. also, shes on skinnys/fatties so you know going from a stock 19in rim to an aluminum racing 15 in rim saves quite a bit of weight...and just like you said we dont know if any additional weight may have been removed.
as for the mph...well i think youre right...they have the wick turned up pretty high. what kind of gas? if theyre running VP116, then as long as the rods hold up, i can see this happening no problem. but pump gas...neh
Don't forget the 105 lbs woman driving it doesn't hurt in the weight dept.
The driver is Rebecca Starkey who's husband Justin owns VMP Tuning.
porcupinekiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2011, 08:14 AM   #3117
newmoon


 
newmoon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 GT350
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by ParisTNDude View Post
Very nice times! I wondered what the bone stock Roush kit would run so I went to the Mustang 5.0 & Fast Fords Magazine at: http://www.mustang50magazine.com/fea..._facility.html
And it looks like their best times were right at 11.70 ET at 120MPH with DOT drag radials. With the base price of one of these things being $47K (their vehicle was at $57K), I would hope you could easily take a Camaro to that level of performance for an additional $12-15K. I can't imagine what the guy in this 10 second video has in his car with the mods mentioned. Money buys performance as many Camaro5 guys can attest.

57K to run 11:70s no thank you.....Take my car 27K new, add $2000.00 of bolt-ons CAI, Hi Flos, and a tune, slap a 7-8lb maggie on for another $6000.00 and for 35k you have a car that will run with it if not better all the while looking much better also
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang
2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock
2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s
2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s
2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned
1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot
newmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2011, 07:33 PM   #3118
ffrcobra_65
Account Suspended
 
Drives: SuperCharged 2SS/RS IOM MN6
Join Date: May 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 5,094
Quote:
Originally Posted by newmoon View Post
57K to run 11:70s no thank you.....Take my car 27K new, add $2000.00 of bolt-ons CAI, Hi Flos, and a tune, slap a 7-8lb maggie on for another $6000.00 and for 35k you have a car that will run with it if not better all the while looking much better also
true...but, you can do that with any car.

Why start at $27k, start at $6k with a 2000 Camaro and add go-fast mods and in the end, maybe $15k total, it will be faster than a $60k+ car.

You seriously don't expect that a car made with $400hp is still going to be as balanced as it came out of the factory when you have added 100lbs, 200rwhp, etc. etc. etc. A lot of people seem to forget or unaware that when you do serious power-mod to a car, you are upsetting its balance and therefore, you need to address other areas of the car to get it balanced again. For instance, you add a SC and your car starts hopping on heavy acceleration...well, you gotta deal with the rear suspension..takes $$. Then you notice the turn in isn't as precise as it used to...well, you just added weight to the front so you gotta deal with that. Oh, then the half-shaft breaks because of the 200 extra hp...or the tranny or clutch starts acting up. All that takes a lot of $ out of your own pocket and it doesn't stop.

Meanwhile, some people like to have a beast straight out of the factory with full factory and is made to work with the upgrades added at the factory. For instance, if you have the money, wouldn't you buy a ZL1 as opposed to buying a SS and piece-mealing the parts to match the ZL1 and voiding the 5 year no-cost warranty? In the end, you still only have just a SS.

I know I am just wasting my time explaining this but had 5 minutes to kill.
ffrcobra_65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2011, 11:46 PM   #3119
Justin@VMP
 
Drives: red with blue oval
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Deltona, FL
Posts: 6
I'll clarify some things...

The car is somewhat heavy compared to others out there, even with my wife driving. The rollbar adds about 75lbs. Our front skinnies are an 18x6 weld with a 215 tire, so they only saved 9lbs over stock wheels, they come in at 46lbs per side. On the up side they will fit my 816RWHP Shelby GT500 when we stop taking this car to the track as much . I believe the car weighs about 3750lbs or a tad more depending on how many baby seats are in the back and whether the trunk mat is in or out.

The 5.0L 4V chamber design allows it to tolerate a ton of timing even at 11:1 compression with boost. About 5-7* more than a blown LS3 camaro with similar boost and octane. I run race gas for the safety margin with a maxxed fuel system, but I believe the timing and could be ramped down for use with pump gas at a very sane 10-12psi (which is all these motors need to make big power).

We are definitely watching the stock parts carefully, I'm not pushing this combo to 13-14psi like some others, it's more about optimizing what we've got and keeping the stock engine/trans/converter alive.

With the roush kit at stock boost we ran 11.2 on a 94F summer day. With additionally tuning and better whether we pushed it into the high 10s. This was on a 265 MT DR on stock 18s.
__________________
Justin Starkey
2007 Shelby GT500 TVS 705RWHP/708RWTQ 11.0@130 18" DRs
2006 F250 6.0 14.3@93
2000 Mustang 3.8 A4 TT 450RWHP@17psi & 10.9@127.8 1.74 60ft@17psi stock motor
2006 Mustang 4.0 M5 Vortech 15psi 395RWHP 12.5@110 wife's
2006 Grand Cherokee SRT8
Justin@VMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2011, 08:15 AM   #3120
newmoon


 
newmoon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 GT350
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin@VMP View Post
I'll clarify some things...

The car is somewhat heavy compared to others out there, even with my wife driving. The rollbar adds about 75lbs. Our front skinnies are an 18x6 weld with a 215 tire, so they only saved 9lbs over stock wheels, they come in at 46lbs per side. On the up side they will fit my 816RWHP Shelby GT500 when we stop taking this car to the track as much . I believe the car weighs about 3750lbs or a tad more depending on how many baby seats are in the back and whether the trunk mat is in or out.

The 5.0L 4V chamber design allows it to tolerate a ton of timing even at 11:1 compression with boost. About 5-7* more than a blown LS3 camaro with similar boost and octane. I run race gas for the safety margin with a maxxed fuel system, but I believe the timing and could be ramped down for use with pump gas at a very sane 10-12psi (which is all these motors need to make big power).

We are definitely watching the stock parts carefully, I'm not pushing this combo to 13-14psi like some others, it's more about optimizing what we've got and keeping the stock engine/trans/converter alive.

With the roush kit at stock boost we ran 11.2 on a 94F summer day. With additionally tuning and better whether we pushed it into the high 10s. This was on a 265 MT DR on stock 18s.
VMP your car is impressive to say the least, how do you see the Coyote holding up at that level of boost? I just finished reading this months issue of 5.0 mag. where they compared a boosted coyote 5.0 to a 11 GT500 5.4, it seems that the Coyote handled the boost and delivered better numbers at the same pressure. I was impressed for sure.
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang
2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock
2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s
2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s
2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned
1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot
newmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2011, 08:21 AM   #3121
newmoon


 
newmoon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 GT350
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by ffrcobra_65 View Post
true...but, you can do that with any car.

Why start at $27k, start at $6k with a 2000 Camaro and add go-fast mods and in the end, maybe $15k total, it will be faster than a $60k+ car.

You seriously don't expect that a car made with $400hp is still going to be as balanced as it came out of the factory when you have added 100lbs, 200rwhp, etc. etc. etc. A lot of people seem to forget or unaware that when you do serious power-mod to a car, you are upsetting its balance and therefore, you need to address other areas of the car to get it balanced again. For instance, you add a SC and your car starts hopping on heavy acceleration...well, you gotta deal with the rear suspension..takes $$. Then you notice the turn in isn't as precise as it used to...well, you just added weight to the front so you gotta deal with that. Oh, then the half-shaft breaks because of the 200 extra hp...or the tranny or clutch starts acting up. All that takes a lot of $ out of your own pocket and it doesn't stop.

Meanwhile, some people like to have a beast straight out of the factory with full factory and is made to work with the upgrades added at the factory. For instance, if you have the money, wouldn't you buy a ZL1 as opposed to buying a SS and piece-mealing the parts to match the ZL1 and voiding the 5 year no-cost warranty? In the end, you still only have just a SS.

I know I am just wasting my time explaining this but had 5 minutes to kill.
In a perfect world I would be placing an order for a ZL1 or I would have a Z06 in the garage already. But being a Father of 3 it's not on the cards for me at this time. I am not really into screaming around corners or entering an auto-cross, I like straight line power. So for me a slightly modded new 27K Camaro makes much more sense. I can upgrade as funds are there and I am driving a new vehicle with 500 miles on it. But the answer is yes I would prefer a turnkey racecar from the factory with a full warranty.
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang
2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock
2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s
2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s
2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned
1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot
newmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2011, 08:39 AM   #3122
GMRULZ

 
GMRULZ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS & 2008 C6
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 1,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin@VMP View Post
I'll clarify some things...

The car is somewhat heavy compared to others out there, even with my wife driving. The rollbar adds about 75lbs. Our front skinnies are an 18x6 weld with a 215 tire, so they only saved 9lbs over stock wheels, they come in at 46lbs per side. On the up side they will fit my 816RWHP Shelby GT500 when we stop taking this car to the track as much . I believe the car weighs about 3750lbs or a tad more depending on how many baby seats are in the back and whether the trunk mat is in or out.

The 5.0L 4V chamber design allows it to tolerate a ton of timing even at 11:1 compression with boost. About 5-7* more than a blown LS3 camaro with similar boost and octane. I run race gas for the safety margin with a maxxed fuel system, but I believe the timing and could be ramped down for use with pump gas at a very sane 10-12psi (which is all these motors need to make big power).

We are definitely watching the stock parts carefully, I'm not pushing this combo to 13-14psi like some others, it's more about optimizing what we've got and keeping the stock engine/trans/converter alive.

With the roush kit at stock boost we ran 11.2 on a 94F summer day. With additionally tuning and better whether we pushed it into the high 10s. This was on a 265 MT DR on stock 18s.
310lbs less than my car w/ my Whipple and me in it.

10-12psi is ok on pump gas for the rods the 5.0 has? At least from a longevity standpoint?

Awesome times out of your car, now we just need to see you run a 9 in it w/ the stock parts, can`t get any closer than you already are.. 10.000 Lol..
__________________
2010 SS L99, 536rwhp 10.843@126.72. Whipple Supercharger stock pulley, ARH 1 7/8 longtubes w/ catted xpipe, magnaflow 3" mufflers, ADM Race CAI, 3:70 gears, lightweight wheels and nitto drag radials. Stock internal L99, stock converter.

Bolt on best before blower 12.22@113.29 w/ nothing but ARH headers, catted x-pipe, ADM CAI and a tune on stock Pzero`s!

Other car 2008 C6 Ls3, z51, A6, Npp Exhaust, best bonestock pass 11.80@118.82, Number 2 on the Corvette Forums Bonestock fastest list..
GMRULZ is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
camaro, camaro vs mustang, cobra, faster, mods, mustang, race


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poll -- Camaro vs Mustang Supercar Shootout JusticePete Suspension / Brakes / Chassis 105 10-09-2013 03:18 PM
Does the v6 have enough power? cstproductions Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 305 08-29-2012 10:27 PM
Winner, winner - Jalopnik compares the Big 3 Number 3 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 31 04-17-2011 04:24 PM
Im sure this has been asked before.. But forgive my innocence :) gmag21 Suspension / Brakes / Chassis 23 02-21-2010 11:29 PM
The DEFINITIVE EXPLANATION OF CAMARO SUSPENSION, ISSUES, AND UPGRADES Info@PeddersUSA.com Suspension / Brakes / Chassis 106 10-19-2009 07:08 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.