![]() |
|
|
#29 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: The Imperial Army Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Darkside
Posts: 15,742
|
Quote:
Not a problem |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
aka Patrick
|
<---- isn't massive car smart.. my expertise is in computers... gradually learning vehicle stuff.
Gear ratio 3:45's? 3:73's? 4:10's? No idea what this means.. yes I know "haha at the retard" What makes 4:10 better than 3:45? (sorry to hijack thread if I am)
__________________
Current Modifications: Your average Bolt-ons & Suspension Upgrades
GForce Engineering: 9" Rear End, Strange Pro Iron Case w/Moser Nodular 3.70:1 Detroit locker, 3.5" Solid Drive Shaft |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Booooosted.
|
4:10 is closer to quitting time than 3:45
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: The Imperial Army Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Darkside
Posts: 15,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
just can't seem to leave
|
Quote:
the lower gear ratios (4.10 & 3.73) are better for acceleration. the higher gear ratios (3.45 & 3.27) are better for top speed & economy. what the numbers mean: if you have a 3.73 differential, the drive shaft has to turn 3.73 times to turn the axle once. the proper way to write it is 3.73:1, but it's assumed that you mean ':1' so we leave it off
__________________
Eve ('00 FRC): hot-air intake
Rowan ('09 H3): 5spd mom-mobile Penny ('99 Sierra): 5.3 / HD 5spd... gone but not forgotten Samson ('18 HD): compounded 408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |||
|
Truth Enforcer
Drives: anything I can get my hands on Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,797
|
Quote:
__________________
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
![]() |
Yeah it wasn't like I was getting full use of them though. I never spun, but I also never launched it as hard as I could have. I had like 2.1 60 ft times, so if I was taking full advantage of them I would have better 60 ft times.
__________________
2002 Chevrolet Camaro SS #7590 345 HP Package, LPP Headers and ORY, GMMG, SLP CAI and Smooth Bellows, PHB, Chrome TTM's ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
aka Patrick
|
Quote:
Thanks
__________________
Current Modifications: Your average Bolt-ons & Suspension Upgrades
GForce Engineering: 9" Rear End, Strange Pro Iron Case w/Moser Nodular 3.70:1 Detroit locker, 3.5" Solid Drive Shaft |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Okie doke
|
The manual will not be slower than the auto
.... you can count on that .. if the manual doesn't trap 111 - 112 in the 1/4 .. I'll be VERY disappointed ..Crowley
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
:chevy:
Drives: 2LT/RS Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 13,035
|
The auto was said to get 4.6 with launch control to 60, the LS3... now dont kill yourselves yet, let me explain first, was said to get 4.9. Now i was told this by one of GMs own employee who played a major role in testing the pre-pros. He first said that the L99 with LC achieved a 4.6, he then said the LS3 got 4.9 but he was shocked, he said that he had gotten better, and he really doubts the 4.9, he claimed that he thinks that was achieved without LC. He knew everything, he knew that the v6 gets better the 6.1, he boldy told the crowd that you would get mid to high 5 seconds. He explained that he doesnt know exactly why it was released as 6.1, but he explained how it was better and that was a good story! SO anyways him telling me that the LS3 was far better then 4.9 with his background was good enough confirmation. With a good driver, the LS3 should be right with the auto, maybe a bit better, maybe a bit worse, youll just have to see for yourself
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |||
|
Truth Enforcer
Drives: anything I can get my hands on Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,797
|
Quote:
sometimes i sit here and think to myself... wtf.
__________________
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
just can't seem to leave
|
Quote:
and only having a 304hp V6 or 426hp V8
__________________
Eve ('00 FRC): hot-air intake
Rowan ('09 H3): 5spd mom-mobile Penny ('99 Sierra): 5.3 / HD 5spd... gone but not forgotten Samson ('18 HD): compounded 408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '10 Camaro 2SS/RS & Magnum R/T Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,520
|
Quote:
__________________
SIM Camaro 2010 V8-2SS/RS-A6!!+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Songs About Camaros (for your driving pleasure) | Emjay | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 74 | 12-18-2014 01:42 AM |
| Do you want the Z28? | ChrisB | Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics | 1616 | 09-05-2010 12:49 AM |
| Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release | Tran | Camaro Convertible Forum | 12 | 11-18-2009 08:05 PM |
| "2010 Camaro: Just a heartbeat away" - Scripps News 11/13/08 | Rallyman6 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 10 | 11-16-2008 02:55 PM |