Mopars r haters!!

[My Caroline]

Originally Posted by RichGreene

Why dont you put your money where your mouth is and race him then ?

Because that is dangerous and illegal, not to mention I'm more mature than that. There's a reason I got my car so young, and believe you me, it wasn't by being an idiot.

Also, I didn't say I'd whoop him either. I just say there is no way he would whoop me considering the difference in weight. I'd love to go to a track and see just how close these two V6s are, but I don't think my friend thinks going to a track is the "cool" thin to do. Guess luck of the draw at the track hoping there's any other 6s there.

[AFROST]

those srt8 are somethen else now they run 12.6 stock that crazy for such a heavy car but it does it!

[My Caroline]

It's funny how some of you trash talk... About trash talking... Then trash talk the OP. /: lolwut

[BlackMamba88]

Originally Posted by angie7

Damn I thought Mustangs were bad but seems the SLOpar folks are out to get me, lol! A friend of mine and car show buddy I run with gives me shit about my SS being slow. He has a '12 SRT8 which is a nice car and the numbers are close plus my SS is not stock. And just today another friend Dodge owner, this time in a stock everyday new Ram claims he can beat me..really guys? Maybe the fact that Camaros have not been around for so many years people forgot that these are SPORTS CARS not sedans, or trucks, or eco friendly..True American Muscle

*disclaimer: no it doesnt bother me, no I dont care what others think, no I didnt buy my car for them. This post was made for fun and the irony

Hey Angie, Im nothing like that and I own a 2010 challenger R/T
I got nothing but love for American Muscle. I love my Beast, and get more thumbs up than my friend do in his 2011 1ss

I brought mine for cruising as well

[angie7]

Originally Posted by BlackMamba88

Hey Angie, Im nothing like that and I own a 2010 challenger R/T
I got nothing but love for American Muscle. I love my Beast, and get more thumbs up than my friend do in his 2011 1ss

I brought mine for cruising as well

Good!! I drive a '08 Charger R/T as my dd as well. I dont care either. The Chargers are a nice car, I like it! Its a nice sedan for a family (I have 2 kids) but can get up and go when needed. I appreciate all cars for what they are.

[angie7]

Originally Posted by My Caroline

It's funny how some of you trash talk... About trash talking... Then trash talk the OP. /: lolwut

No worries...everything Ive said Ive been able to back up with links. Some just like to spout off bc they think being louder makes them right

[ShowSStopper]

Originally Posted by angie7

Well the numbers are very close with the SRT. It would probably come down to the driver. Frankly I dont care whos faster, I didnt buy my car to race it. I just find it funny that its the first thing outta peoples mouths in regards to my car. Mine SS is beautiful, she has nothing to prove.

Firstly, your car looks great!

No disrespect, but the '12 Challengers with the 392 engine are factory beasts. An SS would need some pretty good mods just to keep up, and if the 392 is modded...it's going to get ugly quick.

Yeah, I know what you mean about that being the first thing people want to say...just because you have a Camaro, people are going to do that because it's always associated, along with Mustangs and Challengers and any other sports car, as being a car built for racing. Which isn't entirely untrue, even if you don't race it yourself.

Anyway, that's my $.02.

[AlmondRocca]

I don't understand this. A nice car is a nice car whether its mopar GM or ford. IMO

[angie7]

Originally Posted by Wicked 6

Firstly, your car looks great!

No disrespect, but the '12 Challengers with the 392 engine are factory beasts. An SS would need some pretty good mods just to keep up, and if the 392 is modded...it's going to get ugly quick.

Yeah, I know what you mean about that being the first thing people want to say...just because you have a Camaro, people are going to do that because it's always associated, along with Mustangs and Challengers and any other sports car, as being a car built for racing. Which isn't entirely untrue, even if you don't race it yourself.

Anyway, that's my $.02.

Its not a Challenger is a Charger. Im not sure how a Challenger even got into this thread bc that is not what my friend has. Its a SRT8 Charger.

[invaderzim]

Originally Posted by angie7

No worries...everything Ive said Ive been able to back up with links. Some just like to spout off bc they think being louder makes them right

LMAO you post a link to some random site with an "estimated theoretical top speed without the limiter",it says it right there, (which youve already stated you still have on your car since it isn't tune due to it still being under warranty) and thats "backing everything up with links"? not to mention how you've conveniently "corrected details" after quite a few comments/pages to make the story fit better. that's awesome. your inability to make a mistake and just be wrong is just pure awesomness. true story.

[angie7]

Originally Posted by invaderzim

LMAO you post a link to some random site with an "estimated theoretical top speed without the limiter",it says it right there, (which youve already stated you still have on your car since it isn't tune due to it still being under warranty) and thats "backing everything up with links"? not to mention how you've conveniently "corrected details" after quite a few comments/pages to make the story fit better. that's awesome. your inability to make a mistake and just be wrong is just pure awesomness. true story.

Whatever c5 trash talking is awesome! Tru story bro.

[invaderzim]

Originally Posted by angie7

Whatever c5 trash talking is awesome! Tru story bro.

LOL I gotta admit im stumped at how you just refuse to give in and call it a day. that's resilience. and in all seriousness even an srt8 jeep will give your ss a run for its money. don't let random bloggers on random sites fool you into thinking it can't happen.

[2010redcamaro]

Originally Posted by invaderzim

LOL I gotta admit im stumped at how you just refuse to give in and call it a day. that's resilience. and in all seriousness even an srt8 jeep will give your ss a run for its money. don't let random bloggers on random sites fool you into thinking it can't happen.

yea i have a jeep srt8 running 12.5s i have taken down a few average driven camaros

[angie7]

Originally Posted by invaderzim

LOL I gotta admit im stumped at how you just refuse to give in and call it a day. that's resilience. and in all seriousness even an srt8 jeep will give your ss a run for its money. don't let random bloggers on random sites fool you into thinking it can't happen.

Well lucky for you I am out bc Im done with this pointless thread. Ive already proven my point and E.T. on page 2 posted a motortrend article abou the srt8 CHARGER which is what I was referring to not a 392 Challenger or Jeep that folks brought up on their own. The SRT8 CHARGER numbers are extremely close to a SS Camaro. Im glad that you guys want to keep shouting off about how the SS would get spanked by a Charger, go buy one then. The numbers and links are more accurate then your opinion. And thats fine if you dont want to learn and educate yourself on the topic, thats not my issue.

Just enjoy your car and I will mine no matter what kind it is. That was the point of this thread before the drama club started in

here I added it for you

Originally Posted by E.T.

I don't know why everyone's giving her so much crap, I just did a quick google search, and the numbers for the SRT vs the SS are pretty damn close. So the SRT is maybe a tenth quicker to 60, and a tad quicker in the 1/4 mile? It's not as a big a spread as some of you are making it out to be.

From Motortrend:

2012 Dodge Charger SRT8 Super Bee BASE PRICE $41,000 (MT est) PRICE AS TESTED $41,000 (MT est) VEHICLE LAYOUT Front-engine, RWD, 5-pass, 4-door sedan ENGINE 6.4L/470-hp/470-lb-ft OHV 16-valve V-8 TRANSMISSION 5-speed automatic CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST) 4271 lb (54/46%) WHEELBASE 120.2 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 200.3 x 74.2 x 58.3 in 0-60 MPH 4.4 sec QUARTER MILE 12.8 sec @ 112.6 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 112 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.91 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 25.5 sec @ 0.76 g (avg) EPA CITY/HWY FUEL ECON 14/23 mpg ENERGY CONS, CITY/HWY 241/147 kW-hrs/100 mi CO2 EMISSIONS 1.14 lb/mi
Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...#ixzz1xtrTUcIU

They're nice cars though; I'd take one. Still not as good looking as the Camaro.