![]() |
|
|
#15 |
|
having FUN now 13.66@101
|
Here is a whole thread dedicated to this subject.
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...+timing+octane
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 3,273
|
Has anyone heard if timing is still pulled when running midgrade, say 89 octane?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() Drives: 2015 BVM 1SS/1LE Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: United States of America
Posts: 457
|
I switched from 87 to 93 and my mpg went from 18.6-19.1 to 22.9-23.2 consistently since then. So between that, and whatever timing benefits there are to be had, I've been sticking with 93 in my V6.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 2LT IBM / SIM stripe 6M Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: STL
Posts: 863
|
I will be using a mid-grade 89 Octane when I my 2LT comes in. I bought an '05 Nissan Altima SE V6 3.5 (much like the GM 3.6) new 6 years ago. It also says to use regular gas. I predominately run a mid-grade and it's always easy for me to tell if my wife puts regular gas in it. These fast widing double overhead valve engines have more potential with the right gas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Drives: 1LT/RS Yellow/Black Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 734
|
I agree, your not going to notice a difference just by changing octane. People that do , in my opinion, are feeling "more power" because thats what they want to feel.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Montani Semper Liberi
Drives: 2011 Black 2SS/RS w/ IOM stripes Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Masontown, WV
Posts: 4,841
|
drove on 87 for the first couple months, then I started putting 93 in it and the performance is almost night and day. sputtering went away, much smoother. People saying it's only in your head, well I know I didn't like the way my car was running and switched the gas and viola it improved instantly. I know what I observed, if you want to save a buck be my guest. I am putting the best in my car!
__________________
Stainless Works 1 7/8 Long Tude Headers, Stainless Works High Flow Cats, Stainless Works Retro Chambered Catback, Z/28 Air Intake, RDP Tuned, FR41 Chrome Rims, 1100W stereo, 35% Tint |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
![]() Drives: 11 IBM 1LTRS, '89 Firebird Formula Join Date: May 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 177
|
Quote:
Based on the comments and information in the linked thread, I'm willing to give it a shot and feel for a difference... We'll see how it turns out. The biggest obstacle is finding some pure gas stations as most are 10% ethanol around here.
__________________
1100 - 7/19 - Preliminary order accepted
2000 - 7/21 - Order accepted by GM 2500 - 7/28 - Order preferenced 3000 - 7/28 - Order accepted by production control 3400 - 8/09 - Order broadcast 3800 - 8/17 - Order produced 9/02 - DELIVERED! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro SS Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 781
|
Quote:
Lots of posts about this but basically the higher octane means a slower burn which means have less combustion happening. Some cars are designed for less combustion as they are pushing out more power per combustion. Putting 91 in a car designed specifically for 87 means you are putting out higher power per combustion but you now have less combustions happening which means the over all power is lessoned. GM spent a lot of money over the years designing this motor, and if they felt there was a performance increase they would recommend higher octane. I doesn't hurt the car to do it, just you are taking a performance hit. Now a car designed for higher octane should never have a lower octane in it, not only does it decrease performance but it also can harm the motor. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 camaro Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: hannibal mo
Posts: 207
|
Quote:
I put in da hiha grade fuelz and I can feel teh powa! Vtec!!I kill me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
SStang Killer
Drives: 2010 Summit White Camaro SS/RS Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() |
At first I used 87 in my Camaro but after I had it for a while I switched to 93 and I could definitely feel a difference. Also my mpgs increased
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
NY Football Giants YAY!!!
Drives: 2011 LS Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DMV
Posts: 808
|
I just switched to 97 and noticed the fuel doesn't burn as fast. I'm getting a little better fuel economy.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Its all about the U
Drives: 2010 SGM Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,671
|
+1
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Really Slow Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 57,226
|
97?! Lucky bastard!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GROUP BUY- Mach XL V6 (Manual) and Mach XLT V6 (Automatic)- Ends 11/30/09 | GOINGSOLO2 | V6 Bolt-Ons & Tunes | 252 | 10-20-2011 09:33 PM |
| JRE FUEL SYSTEM UPGRADE EDELBROCK SUPERCHARGERS | JANNETTYRACING | Forced Induction - V8 | 91 | 05-11-2011 11:35 AM |
| Grade of fuel | Xander | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 56 | 02-22-2010 12:03 PM |
| Camaro ls3 news...true or false? | Dark Knight | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 74 | 06-05-2008 06:29 PM |