![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Drives: 68 RS, 2010 2LT Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ontario
Posts: 58
|
V6 fuel switch 87 to a higher grade
Has anyone switched their V6 from the 87 octane to a higher octane? If so, have you seen any difference in performance and/or fuel economy? Over the summer I switched my Equinox to the mid grade fuel and noticed a performance difference especially when towing a trailer, seemed to manage the hills a littler easier and acceleration seems better. I just switched my Camaro 2Lt over to see if there is a bit of a gain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
having FUN now 13.66@101
|
There was some write ups from "scrming" that indicated that the timing is pulled down while using 87 octane. He switched to 92 or 93 and there was no timing pull. This indicates that switching octane does allow you to use all the potential horsepower the V6 has to offer. Keep in mind that this engine will run fine on 87 octane but won't be fully utilized.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Really Slow Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 57,201
|
i never noticed a difference, but that's because my car has never tasted anything lower than 91 octane.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
"Back in Black"
Drives: '10 1LT/RS Black w/Silver Stripes Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,329
|
I've run 87 and now strictly 91. I noticed no difference in either performance or MPG. I just like knowing that I'm putting better fuel into my car (the low grade stuff out here can be sketchy at best).
__________________
![]() To the Jerkoff in SW Denver Driving the Black Camaro: Quit making us look bad by driving like a tool and cutting people off (my wife included)! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,630
|
how does octane ratings relate to fuel quality?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Winners find a way
Drives: 2010 2LT/RS M6 Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,137
|
I switched to 92 or 93 after a couple of months and did notice a small change in mid-high rpm pull.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Drives: 68 RS, 2010 2LT Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ontario
Posts: 58
|
I was wondering if pulling the engine control fuses would make a difference, same sort of thing that some folks do when adding a CAI?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 camaro Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: hannibal mo
Posts: 207
|
People saying they can feel the difference in 87 or 91 ocatane is in their head. You are not going to feel 5-6 hp....especially in a 3800lb car.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 3,273
|
It has been shown that timing is pulled with 87 octane. I'm actually curious as to whether midgrade is enough to avoid this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I wouldn't imagine any significant diff on hp
__________________
2010 2011 Chevrolet Camaro Faded Black Side Vent Highlight Decal Kit
Life is not like a box of chocolates, its more like eating a whole jar of jalapenos.... what you do today may burn your ass tomorrow!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Winners find a way
Drives: 2010 2LT/RS M6 Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,137
|
Quote:
Do you know how many degrees of timing get pulled using the lower octane? what RPM range does it effect? Don't know what dyno results would be on this motor, but my 550HP big block loses 40 with timing retarded only 4 deg.... it's not a linear loss, more than that and it falls off real fast.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 3,273
|
Found this at:
http://www.bikerenews.com/Stories_Ar.../Gas_Facts.htm What octane does my vehicle need? To determine your vehicle's octane requirement, look at the manufacturer's recommendation in your owner's manual. Most auto manufacturers recommend 87 octane gasoline, as measured by the (R + M) / 2 method on a test engine under defined operating conditions. If the vehicle knocks on the recommended grade, a higher octane grade should be selected. Some foreign vehicle manuals recommend a Research Octane Number (RON) instead of the more common octane rating that appears on most gasoline pumps. As a rule of thumb, the recommended octane rating can be determined by subtracting four (4) from the recommended RON number. A vehicle that calls for "91 RON" should use 87 octane gasoline (as measured by the (R + M) / 2 method). Using a higher grade than is required will not usually increase performance. However, if the vehicle is equipped with knock sensors, as many late model vehicles are, a higher octane grade may enhance performance. Why does my vehicle require a higher octane gasoline than is recommended in my owner's manual? There are two reasons. First, the engine may be at the upper end of the octane requirement range for the particular model. It may, therefore, knock during periods of heavy engine load. The octane requirement for each engine in vehicles of the same make is different because of variations in manufacturing tolerances. Industry testing has shown that this difference can range between two and five octane numbers. While you will not hear knock, the spark timing will be retarded, resulting in loss of power and performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Rev Couture
Drives: 2010 LS Camaro & 2013 Rav4 Ltd Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jamlando, FL
Posts: 1,129
|
I need to find the link here, but I remember reading dyno pulls on cars using 87 oct and getting 230-235 to the wheels and cars using 93 were getting 250 or so...
Ive only used 93 oct (the dealership filled my first tank with it) and until someone somehow proves that using 87 is better I'm not switching
__________________
EBC Brakes| DOT 4|Bigworm| SickSpeed| BMR | IPF | Vararam| MRT |MGW | Nitto | Rx |
Iggee |ZL-1 Sways| Hurst | Apex Racing|Past: Srt-4| 6.0L GTO- RIP | '98 Integra |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() Drives: 2011 1LT/RJT/Auto/ Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Western NY
Posts: 104
|
If you are not trying to shave ETs...then don't waste your time upgrading fuel. Save your money and buy a good CAI.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GROUP BUY- Mach XL V6 (Manual) and Mach XLT V6 (Automatic)- Ends 11/30/09 | GOINGSOLO2 | V6 Bolt-Ons & Tunes | 252 | 10-20-2011 09:33 PM |
| JRE FUEL SYSTEM UPGRADE EDELBROCK SUPERCHARGERS | JANNETTYRACING | Forced Induction - V8 | 91 | 05-11-2011 11:35 AM |
| Grade of fuel | Xander | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 56 | 02-22-2010 12:03 PM |
| Camaro ls3 news...true or false? | Dark Knight | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 74 | 06-05-2008 06:29 PM |