Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-08-2010, 01:52 PM   #29
tradosaurus
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 F150 Lariat, Candy Red
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,279
The hilarious part about this thread is that the SS owners are doing fuse pulls so they can use 87 octane.

93 octane being 20 cents more I wonder if the extra $4.00 a tank when filling up is worth it?
tradosaurus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 01:59 PM   #30
Jefe's SS
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS IOM L99
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Thornton, CO
Posts: 339
Quote:
Originally Posted by tradosaurus View Post
The hilarious part about this thread is that the SS owners are doing fuse pulls so they can use 87 octane.

93 octane being 20 cents more I wonder if the extra $4.00 a tank when filling up is worth it?

SS owners are doing a fuse pull to reset the timing pull when a low octane is used as the computer will not revert back to the high octane program. There is no need to pull the fuse if you want to use low octane the computer will adjust timing automatically.
Jefe's SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 02:04 PM   #31
tradosaurus
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 F150 Lariat, Candy Red
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefe's SS View Post
SS owners are doing a fuse pull to reset the timing pull when a low octane is used as the computer will not revert back to the high octane program. There is no need to pull the fuse if you want to use low octane the computer will adjust timing automatically.
I'm still laughing.
tradosaurus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 02:06 PM   #32
Jefe's SS
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS IOM L99
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Thornton, CO
Posts: 339
Quote:
Originally Posted by justa25thTA View Post
how does octane ratings relate to fuel quality?
Thay don't. Fuel quality is most affected by the age and debris in the storage tanks. A new, busy station is usually best. Older stations that see low amounts of business should be avoided.

FYI- Stations buy from the cheapest source the day they order fuel. A Conoco may get gas from Chevron, Shell, Total, etc. Some franchises requrie certain "cleaners" or additives to be added to their specs. The Fed Govt. requries a minimum of additives to be added. These are more than ample to keep your fuel and injection system clean.

IOW it's all the same.
Jefe's SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 02:06 PM   #33
John Shields
"Back in Black"
 
John Shields's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 1LT/RS Black w/Silver Stripes
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by phenixdragon View Post
lol, cracks me up to see someone things this.








Lots of posts about this but basically the higher octane means a slower burn which means have less combustion happening. Some cars are designed for less combustion as they are pushing out more power per combustion. Putting 91 in a car designed specifically for 87 means you are putting out higher power per combustion but you now have less combustions happening which means the over all power is lessoned. GM spent a lot of money over the years designing this motor, and if they felt there was a performance increase they would recommend higher octane. I doesn't hurt the car to do it, just you are taking a performance hit. Now a car designed for higher octane should never have a lower octane in it, not only does it decrease performance but it also can harm the motor.
I guess you failed to read my post. I never said anything about combustion, and I never said anything about performance. I use the higher level fuel because it's cleaner. The unleaded here is crap fuel and often times these stations mix their fuel with other substances. The higher level fuel is usually better quality gas. There was a big stink about this a couple years back when the news did an investigation into what some stations were doing around here with their Unleaded gas.

Last time I gassed up, I paid 2.53 per gallon of Premium where every other place around me was charging 2.85 for Premium and 2.65 for Unleaded. The place I went to (a Conoco, or some other such reputable place) was out of everything but Premium and gave everyone a deal. Along with that, a purchase of a car wash took another .10 off per gallon. Which it needed anyway.
__________________

To the Jerkoff in SW Denver Driving the Black Camaro:
Quit making us look bad by driving like a tool and cutting people off (my wife included)!
John Shields is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 02:16 PM   #34
usa1camaro1969
Back on the dino-juice
 
usa1camaro1969's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 LS + a few more
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by phenixdragon View Post
Lots of posts about this but basically the higher octane means a slower burn which means have less combustion happening. Some cars are designed for less combustion as they are pushing out more power per combustion. Putting 91 in a car designed specifically for 87 means you are putting out higher power per combustion but you now have less combustions happening which means the over all power is lessoned. GM spent a lot of money over the years designing this motor, and if they felt there was a performance increase they would recommend higher octane. I doesn't hurt the car to do it, just you are taking a performance hit. Now a car designed for higher octane should never have a lower octane in it, not only does it decrease performance but it also can harm the motor.
Higher octane doesn't equate to slower burn rate, it equates to less likelihood for detonation:
Higher-octane fuel isn't harder to ignite in the usual way (that is, with a spark); the octane rating just indicates how easily the fuel can SPONTANEOUSLY ignite before the flame-front reaches it. "Spontaneous pre-ignition" is just another phrase for "detonation" or "knock"; higher-octane fuels resist knocking better than low-octane fuels.
On a motor such as ours, when detonation occurs we have a knock sensor that pulls timing, which takes care of the detonation but also decreases power output. These motors have a lot of compression for 87 octane, but they have taken the DI and knock sensors and made it all work.
__________________
I wake up in the morning and I piss excellence.
-Ricky Bobby
America is all about speed. Hot, nasty, badass speed. -Eleanor Roosevelt, 1936
usa1camaro1969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 02:21 PM   #35
usa1camaro1969
Back on the dino-juice
 
usa1camaro1969's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 LS + a few more
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by phenixdragon View Post
Lots of posts about this but basically the higher octane means a slower burn which means have less combustion happening. Some cars are designed for less combustion as they are pushing out more power per combustion. Putting 91 in a car designed specifically for 87 means you are putting out higher power per combustion but you now have less combustions happening which means the over all power is lessoned. GM spent a lot of money over the years designing this motor, and if they felt there was a performance increase they would recommend higher octane. I doesn't hurt the car to do it, just you are taking a performance hit. Now a car designed for higher octane should never have a lower octane in it, not only does it decrease performance but it also can harm the motor.
Higher octane doesn't equate to slower burn rate, it equates to less likelihood for detonation:
Higher-octane fuel isn't harder to ignite in the usual way (that is, with a spark); the octane rating just indicates how easily the fuel can SPONTANEOUSLY ignite before the flame-front reaches it. "Spontaneous pre-ignition" is just another phrase for "detonation" or "knock"; higher-octane fuels resist knocking better than low-octane fuels.
On a motor such as ours, when detonation occurs we have a knock sensor that pulls timing, which takes care of the detonation but also decreases power output. These motors have a lot of compression for 87 octane, but they have taken the DI and knock sensors and made it all work.
__________________
I wake up in the morning and I piss excellence.
-Ricky Bobby
America is all about speed. Hot, nasty, badass speed. -Eleanor Roosevelt, 1936
usa1camaro1969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 02:55 PM   #36
melody301
NY Football Giants YAY!!!
 
melody301's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 LS
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DMV
Posts: 808
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoorMansCamaro View Post
97?! Lucky bastard!
LOL Sorry typo. I meant 93
__________________
melody301 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 02:59 PM   #37
John Shields
"Back in Black"
 
John Shields's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 1LT/RS Black w/Silver Stripes
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by melody301 View Post
LOL Sorry typo. I meant 93
Someone around here said they are using 101 octane. I saw that and was skeptical but I guess it exists where someone could be buying it weekly.
__________________

To the Jerkoff in SW Denver Driving the Black Camaro:
Quit making us look bad by driving like a tool and cutting people off (my wife included)!
John Shields is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 03:01 PM   #38
PoorMansCamaro



 
PoorMansCamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: Really Slow
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 57,226
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Shields View Post
Someone around here said they are using 101 octane. I saw that and was skeptical but I guess it exists where someone could be buying it weekly.
we have 100 here in vegas at a few rebel stations. But i wouldn't recommend it without a tune. Plus it's expensive. About $7 a gallon.
__________________
PoorMansCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 03:21 PM   #39
CamaroMiami
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS LS3, 92 Camaro RS
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 530
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoorMansCamaro View Post
we have 100 here in vegas at a few rebel stations. But i wouldn't recommend it without a tune. Plus it's expensive. About $7 a gallon.
100 is down here and expensive also.

In my 92 (V6) camaro, I use higher/better gas (91- 93) and have the feeling of a better benefit. I have no data to support more HP or anything. Just the gut/mental feeling and smile.
CamaroMiami is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 07:46 PM   #40
Icefsh
 
Icefsh's Avatar
 
Drives: CGM 2LT/RS M6
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Littleton, CO.
Posts: 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by jshaf View Post
drove on 87 for the first couple months, then I started putting 93 in it and the performance is almost night and day. sputtering went away, much smoother. People saying it's only in your head, well I know I didn't like the way my car was running and switched the gas and viola it improved instantly. I know what I observed, if you want to save a buck be my guest. I am putting the best in my car!
Same thing happened to me. Only difference is I ran 85 octane. Thought that living at higher alltitude would not require the higher grade of fuel. Sure was surprised with a few tanks of 91. Now I found a conoco that has no ethanol and have noticed even more improvement. If it is in my head I will be happy to pay extra for that high.
Icefsh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 08:39 PM   #41
lets_go_bills

 
lets_go_bills's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2LT/RS CGM M6
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 815
There is no difference. To some it's important but any "difference" they claim to "feel" may be all in thier head. If GM designed the car to run "better" on a higher octane rating, they would recommend the car run on it. The manual says 87 octane is fine to use. Use that.

Octane levels have nothing to do with fuel quality. Always buy your fuel from a reputable company.

Want the added detergents and additives? You don't need higher octane, buy STP fuel cleaners/additives/boosters. They make great products and you only have to use it twice a year ($5/bottle). It'll reduce any knocks, improve fuel economy and restore power/acceleration.

Just my opinion, but anyone who uses anything above 87 in their V6 is being silly and wasting their money.

Last edited by lets_go_bills; 09-08-2010 at 08:54 PM.
lets_go_bills is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 08:44 PM   #42
E.T.


 
E.T.'s Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 3,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by lets_go_bills View Post
The manual says 87 octane. Use that.
Manual actually says use 87 or higher.

Just sayin...
E.T. is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GROUP BUY- Mach XL V6 (Manual) and Mach XLT V6 (Automatic)- Ends 11/30/09 GOINGSOLO2 V6 Bolt-Ons & Tunes 252 10-20-2011 09:33 PM
JRE FUEL SYSTEM UPGRADE EDELBROCK SUPERCHARGERS JANNETTYRACING Forced Induction - V8 91 05-11-2011 11:35 AM
Grade of fuel Xander 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 56 02-22-2010 12:03 PM
Camaro ls3 news...true or false? Dark Knight Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 74 06-05-2008 06:29 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.