![]() |
|
|
#2843 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Challenger R/T;2011 Mustang GT Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,105
|
Quote:
Pretty sure Ford will dump the 5.4 in favor of a S/C 5.0. This will reduce weight and produce more power which will result in the best GT500 to date. The 5.4 days are numbered.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2844 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: bug Join Date: May 2009
Location: nv
Posts: 1,319
|
I sure hope so, I'd love to have Ti-VCT vs 29 cube's but I'm not so sure it will happen that quick due to the millions spent on their new 2011 GT500 engine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2845 |
|
Account Suspended
|
GT500's days are numbered, not just the 5.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2846 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Challenger R/T;2011 Mustang GT Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,105
|
Quote:
They had already produced an aluminum 5.4 block for the Ford GT. More like they recast the block. Ford has their gun loaded ready to pull the trigger on the demise of the 5.4. It is old tech and needs to be replaced especially with the competition it will receive. GT500 days may be numbered but I will venture to guess a "Cobra" variant of some type will replace it and will use the Coyote in a forced induction form. I personally would love to see a turbo but more than likely a S/C similar to the Roush TVS will be the head unit. If they make a turbo variant, I will get rid of my 2011 GT and put myself on the list. Otherwise I will stick with the GT and work on those 10 sec. N/A runs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2847 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: bug Join Date: May 2009
Location: nv
Posts: 1,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2848 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2005 STi corn fed Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,997
|
Ford should just put the roush 777 in a boss 302 and call it the boss 429. Then maybe GM would stick the ls9 in the camaro. That would end the pony car wars because they would all be wrapped around trees LOL.
As far as the 5.4 being ditched. . . I think it's closer than many realize. The boss engine with some lower comp pistons and a blower or mild turbo setup would be monstrous and more cost effective. I think the boss is a bit of a peak into the future of the gt500. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2849 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Challenger R/T;2011 Mustang GT Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,105
|
Quote:
That technology has been around for some time. Nothing really new there. I recall the day they started using Nikasil to line the cylinder bores of 2-stroke motors in dirt bikes. That was around 1988. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikasil I have 1988 CR250 sitting in my garage wanting to be put back together that was one of the first motors in that era to use a plated cylinder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2850 | |
|
Born Olds, Living Chevy
|
Quote:
I pray for the day motor city decides to do what they started doing in the 60's, putting rediculously powerful engines in small, cheap cars.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2851 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,418
|
Quote:
They mention in the article that it was cool. Also...."We encountered mild weather and a good track" It was not in the heat of the summer etc. The conditions were fine. They had the track to themselves, they had a professional driver behind the wheel.what more could ANYONE ask for? When they ran the car earlier in sonoma california at Infeneon they only mustered a 12.6 @ 115. They also iced the shit out of the intake for over an hour before the 11.9 run (another cheap little trick they always use in the ford mags that gets them some tenths) They pulled out every trick in the book in good conditions to run that 11.9.(in typical MM&FF fashion) NOT GOING TO HAPPEN most of the time. Last edited by ULTRAZLS1; 01-21-2011 at 11:19 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2852 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2005 STi corn fed Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2853 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,418
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2854 |
|
1 n the head,2 n da chest
Drives: 2002 cadillac deville Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: huntsville al.
Posts: 659
|
you know, reading that reminds me, i need 28" tall tires, not 26. i dont wanna shift brfore getting to the lights.
__________________
2011GT E85, Kooks 1-7/8", 3" offroad X, 2-7/8" overaxles, Roush mufflers, CobraJet intake, SCJ monoblade throttle body, drew 4.5" CAI, Boss302S exhaust valve springs, Baby CobraJet exhaust cams. 3.73 gears, lightweight 300A. 455rwhp @7800/410rwtq SAE 5000lb roller dynojet
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2855 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Challenger R/T;2011 Mustang GT Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2856 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: bug Join Date: May 2009
Location: nv
Posts: 1,319
|
I use a 28" (325/50/15) and it obviously accelerated quicker when I had my 26" DR's but I was over powering them on my launch. Since I enjoyed the everyday traction I wanted a tire that would hook up my future mods and look good for DD use. I still have the 275/50/15 Hoosier DR's if I ever feel like crossing the line at redline in 4th gear which is 134 mph vs 144 mph with my current set up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| camaro, camaro vs mustang, cobra, faster, mods, mustang, race |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Poll -- Camaro vs Mustang Supercar Shootout | JusticePete | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 105 | 10-09-2013 03:18 PM |
| Does the v6 have enough power? | cstproductions | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 305 | 08-29-2012 10:27 PM |
| Winner, winner - Jalopnik compares the Big 3 | Number 3 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 31 | 04-17-2011 04:24 PM |
| Im sure this has been asked before.. But forgive my innocence :) | gmag21 | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 23 | 02-21-2010 11:29 PM |
| The DEFINITIVE EXPLANATION OF CAMARO SUSPENSION, ISSUES, AND UPGRADES | Info@PeddersUSA.com | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 106 | 10-19-2009 07:08 PM |