Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Chevy Camaro vs...


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-14-2011, 10:33 AM   #3207
JusticePete
 
Drives: Camaro Justice
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 20,171
Pedders / Saleen / Speed Lab parts are the same. Once we partnered with them it made no sense to sell under two main brands so all Pedders Mustang parts carry the Saleeen / Speed Lab name.

The Mustang did VERY well. The Camaro did bit better. The Camaro was no ordinary Camaro. Aside from a big RWHP advantage, the Camaro also had a full year of setup refinement since the first public track session. A year of setup development is an eternity. We'll run the Mustang again with a slightly revised setup as noted on page 14. It should be a full second faster or more.

That said, compare the Mustang we ran to the Z06. It is 2 seconds faster than a Z06 and can be ordered with a warranty through Saleen Dealers for the same price as a Z06.
JusticePete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2011, 01:47 PM   #3208
Sax1031


 
Drives: 2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
Yea didn't the Camaro have around 100 more wheel hp than the stang?
Sax1031 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2011, 02:07 PM   #3209
JusticePete
 
Drives: Camaro Justice
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 20,171
Yes it did, but that wasn't the difference. The data logging showed the Mustang out accelerated and out braked the Camaro. The Mustang outperformed the Camaro with the exception of cornering and putting power down out of the corners. Corners are where the extra weight from the Camaro IRS really shined.

To make the Mustang faster we had to reduce the rear sway bar diameter and go back to the 26mm bar, soften the rear coils and raise the rear ride height. The other area that really hurt the Mustang was the seating. A five point harness will hold the driver securely in place.

To make the Camaro better we want to move to a ZL1. It isn't for the RWHP. Gingerman is a suspension, brakes and tires course. We move to the ZL1 for improve weight distribution. Our ProCharger is on the front of the engine and in front of the front 'axle'. The LSA has the blower in the same position as the Mustang. Moving that weight further back will improve handling. The other advantages to the ZL1 are a stronger differential that will put power down in the highest G turns and the new sway bar locating points that make the rear bar more efficient.

The next time on track I expect the Mustang to be just over 1 second faster. I would expect the ZL1 to be 1.5 seconds faster. That has the Mustang vs Camaro race back to a virtual dead heat. Would a BOSS engine make a difference? Not that much because once again, this is a suspension, brake and tire track.

Now the ZL1 is just a pulley and tune away from 600 RWHP and a Speed Lab / Saleen blower on a BOSS would make some hair raising numbers. HUGE leaps in RWHP will reduce lap times by a couple of tenths. Then we could add a five point harness to the Camaro...
JusticePete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2011, 02:23 PM   #3210
8cd03gro


 
Drives: 2005 STi corn fed
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,997
Would the potential gearing advantage of the new 6 speed have helped the mustang or was the mustang able to be geared well enough with the 5-speed that the 6 would have been negligible? Just wondering.
8cd03gro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2011, 02:27 PM   #3211
JusticePete
 
Drives: Camaro Justice
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 20,171
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8cd03gro View Post
Would the potential gearing advantage of the new 6 speed have helped the mustang or was the mustang able to be geared well enough with the 5-speed that the 6 would have been negligible? Just wondering.
Based on data logging, the only help needed was with the rear suspension. It was very fast and the gearing seemed to be just about dead nuts on. When you watch the video with the data logging you can see the RPMs are about where you would want them for both the track and power band.
JusticePete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2011, 03:18 PM   #3212
E.T.


 
E.T.'s Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 3,273
I don't know what year Mustang GT this is, but regardless, here is a case of a V8 being beaten by a V6. It happens...

__________________

E.T. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2011, 03:30 PM   #3213
20Camaro11
 
20Camaro11's Avatar
 
Drives: SS
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: not here
Posts: 655
[QUOTE=E.T.;2959471]I don't know what year Mustang GT this is, but regardless, here is a case of a V8 being beaten by a V6. It happens...
QUOTE]


Mustang won it at the line......did someone say drivers race?
20Camaro11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2011, 04:13 PM   #3214
REEFBLUE93
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 1993 Rustang
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 941
This would make for a great episode of Myth Busters! I have to admit, the 5th Gen V6 is pretty impressive for being a N/A six cylinder. Don't know if GM had "race car" in mind when they designed it so it will be interesting to see how they hold up after being run down the track repeatedly.
REEFBLUE93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2011, 04:56 PM   #3215
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Unless I'm mistaken, this thread is about a Mustang GT from the 2000 MY and NOT 05-09 GT's. So all this talk about the newer cars is rather off topic. In fact, its getting deleted right after I hit submit ...
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2011, 07:03 PM   #3216
porcupinekiller
 
porcupinekiller's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 GT500
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Posts: 662
Quote:
Originally Posted by JusticePete View Post
Yes it did, but that wasn't the difference. The data logging showed the Mustang out accelerated and out braked the Camaro. The Mustang outperformed the Camaro with the exception of cornering and putting power down out of the corners. Corners are where the extra weight from the Camaro IRS really shined.

To make the Mustang faster we had to reduce the rear sway bar diameter and go back to the 26mm bar, soften the rear coils and raise the rear ride height. The other area that really hurt the Mustang was the seating. A five point harness will hold the driver securely in place.

To make the Camaro better we want to move to a ZL1. It isn't for the RWHP. Gingerman is a suspension, brakes and tires course. We move to the ZL1 for improve weight distribution. Our ProCharger is on the front of the engine and in front of the front 'axle'. The LSA has the blower in the same position as the Mustang. Moving that weight further back will improve handling. The other advantages to the ZL1 are a stronger differential that will put power down in the highest G turns and the new sway bar locating points that make the rear bar more efficient.

The next time on track I expect the Mustang to be just over 1 second faster. I would expect the ZL1 to be 1.5 seconds faster. That has the Mustang vs Camaro race back to a virtual dead heat. Would a BOSS engine make a difference? Not that much because once again, this is a suspension, brake and tire track.

Now the ZL1 is just a pulley and tune away from 600 RWHP and a Speed Lab / Saleen blower on a BOSS would make some hair raising numbers. HUGE leaps in RWHP will reduce lap times by a couple of tenths. Then we could add a five point harness to the Camaro...
It would be much more interesting if you guys built a 2012 ZL1 and a 2012 GT500.
That would be one hell of crazy pair, modded and ripping up the track.
porcupinekiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2011, 07:04 PM   #3217
JusticePete
 
Drives: Camaro Justice
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 20,171
Quote:
Originally Posted by porcupinekiller View Post
It would be much more interesting if you guys built a 2012 ZL1 and a 2012 GT500.
That would be one hell of crazy pair, modded and ripping up the track.
The ZL1 is coming. Can the GT500 or whatever the next iteration be far behind?
JusticePete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2011, 07:41 PM   #3218
porcupinekiller
 
porcupinekiller's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 GT500
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Posts: 662
Quote:
Originally Posted by JusticePete View Post
The ZL1 is coming. Can the GT500 or whatever the next iteration be far behind?
The 2012 ZL1 will be available early in 2012 (about a year away). The 2012 GT500 is already showing up at dealers across the country. So..........you guys can pick up a GT500 and get started.
porcupinekiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2011, 07:43 PM   #3219
usa1camaro1969
Back on the dino-juice
 
usa1camaro1969's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 LS + a few more
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,641
Wondering why I even bother posting in these. You left half the pages that didn't even have anything to say about the 2000 MY mustang and deleted a select few.

To the OP, stop asking if your car is faster or not and take it to the track. It'd your best bet to decide if it's worthy or not. You might actually enjoy it.
__________________
I wake up in the morning and I piss excellence.
-Ricky Bobby
America is all about speed. Hot, nasty, badass speed. -Eleanor Roosevelt, 1936
usa1camaro1969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2011, 08:11 PM   #3220
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by usa1camaro1969 View Post
Wondering why I even bother posting in these. You left half the pages that didn't even have anything to say about the 2000 MY mustang and deleted a select few.

To the OP, stop asking if your car is faster or not and take it to the track. It'd your best bet to decide if it's worthy or not. You might actually enjoy it.
I deleted 30 posts regarding the 2005-2009 Mustang ... hardly a 'select few'
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
camaro, camaro vs mustang, cobra, faster, mods, mustang, race


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poll -- Camaro vs Mustang Supercar Shootout JusticePete Suspension / Brakes / Chassis 105 10-09-2013 03:18 PM
Does the v6 have enough power? cstproductions Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 305 08-29-2012 10:27 PM
Winner, winner - Jalopnik compares the Big 3 Number 3 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 31 04-17-2011 04:24 PM
Im sure this has been asked before.. But forgive my innocence :) gmag21 Suspension / Brakes / Chassis 23 02-21-2010 11:29 PM
The DEFINITIVE EXPLANATION OF CAMARO SUSPENSION, ISSUES, AND UPGRADES Info@PeddersUSA.com Suspension / Brakes / Chassis 106 10-19-2009 07:08 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.