![]() |
|
|
#15 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,127
|
Quote:
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: jealous vendors mad!! HAHA!! Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CYBERGMONSTER@GMAIL.COM
Posts: 3,658
|
Quote:
The tune I first went in with was actually bumped up to +9* and showed a very good AF around low 12's to 11's, but made less power. I don't know about 10's. That is waaaay too rich, but is something I will bring up once our tuner get back from vacation. Unfortunately, we only have one tuner. Check this dyno run out tho.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,967
|
Agreed...that low end TQ looks very sweet, your a good 30 or more TQ higher than stock or lightly modded LLTs at that range....so hey the E85 project was no faiilure thats forsure.
I also agree, you probably do have the most powerful N/A LLT at the moment....at least from what I've seen here on Camaro5. Congrats my man! lol
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,127
|
Hey, one more thing. Do you have the WinPep software and the run files? If so, change the correction to SAE and see what it looks like.
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: jealous vendors mad!! HAHA!! Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CYBERGMONSTER@GMAIL.COM
Posts: 3,658
|
Quote:
Even the owner of the shop told me that their dyno read lower from day one. They have the fastest lexus in the world and are used to dynoing 1000hp turbo cars all day! so with their 2000hp rated dyno it will usually read lower than the smaller dynojet. Imagine if I would have dynoed on a dyno that stock cars see the sometimes 250-260 numbers, I would of had or would probably hit very very close to 300rwhp. So even tho the gain was only about 20hp, the total gain is very solid. The early peak come from additional valve timing that vince tweaked just for this e85 tune, but I think the outcome is very different than what we intended. One thing for sure is that it defenitely pushed all of its tq to a very low RPM band. Which is something our LLT can defenitely use. If I would of had anything other than this crappy stock intake today.. I think even with the low reading dyno I probably would of been at or very close to 300. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Rolling along...
|
I really wonder how much the stock intake is limiting the gains here? The gains shown are great but how much better would they be with an Injen or Vararam intake installed. The mods you've done so far allow the exhaust side of the engine to breathe better but how much restriction is there in getting air into the engine?
The gains so far look great. Can't wait to see how things go once you can ditch that stock intake....
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
It's just a barbie car
Drives: Solstice gxp Join Date: May 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 63
|
Nice gains the more you mod the more gains you'll see from e85
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: jealous vendors mad!! HAHA!! Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CYBERGMONSTER@GMAIL.COM
Posts: 3,658
|
I forgot to thank you gretchen.. I never knew that I can download the run file and use it in my own living room. When I do SAE correction every number get lower to about 5-6. Is that about right?
Prenger, if we are talking about all motor, than I dont mind taking the most powerful LLT all motor class title. ![]() after I put on the vararam, maybe I should take my car to a dyno that I know it will read stock cars in the 250-260 range so I can make "some" peoples happy with 300+ rwhp ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
It's just a barbie car
Drives: Solstice gxp Join Date: May 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 63
|
Any gain over 93 oct is a gain
A gain In Hp is a gain in hp Nobody can really argue if it would b worth it or not it still makes more hp on e85 then 93 |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: jealous vendors mad!! HAHA!! Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CYBERGMONSTER@GMAIL.COM
Posts: 3,658
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: jealous vendors mad!! HAHA!! Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CYBERGMONSTER@GMAIL.COM
Posts: 3,658
|
GXP, now I know why I was feeling the rush in the lower rpm's..all the damn torque is between 2k and 3+k
I guess my butt dyno was not wrong, it was just in the better place![]() Another thing I want to add is that by doing the pulls between 3rd and 4th there are about 8 extra tq and 5hp difference. The 3rd gear pull show a difference of 20+ tq extra across the lower rpm with e85 with e85. So there's defenitely a much bigger gain in 3rd gear vs 4th.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
![]() Drives: 2017 1SS Convertible Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 583
|
These are encouraging results. It's nice to see some gains out of the E85, and I'm sure Vince has some room to tweak the tune and possibly see some more gains.
The increased torque at low RPM must be what you were feeling on your butt-dyno. And, there's something to be said for having one of, if not the, most powerful Camaro V6 to date =P
__________________
Performance Mods: Injen Powerflow CAI, Doug Thorley Cat-Back Exhaust, Doug Thorley Shorty Headers, Trifecta Tune, TSW Nurburgring Wheels 20x9, 3.45 Ratio LSD Swap, VMax Black Ice-Olator
Appearance Mods: RiderGraphix LS7 Front Fascia Blackout Vinyl, Gill Insert Vinyl, Rear Deck Lid Vinyl (Gloss Black), Gary's Customs Painted Bowties Coming Soon: BMR Trailing Arms |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,967
|
If you keep your E85 tune for now, and you add the VR intake...I would say take it back to the same place again.
Yeah it would be sweet to take it to a dyno that reads a bit higher and maybe help "guarantee" 300rwhp, but if we want to be honest and get more useful information, the dyno should be done at the same location...just my opinion. Then we will see what this VR intake can do for a car with full bolt ons and a tune. Your right...you won't see the 20 or 25+ HP as on a stock or nearly stock car...but surely another 10 is feasible???!!!. I'm guessing they have a decent fan that could be used to help the VR intake on the dyno? I'd guess the VR performs better on the street than on the dyno...who knows. Now Im just rambling lol
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 LS Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: FL
Posts: 1,643
|
Quote:
Although I get how tough it would be to not go to a higher dyno, This is a science experiment so constants are important. It is your money so I respect whatever decision you make.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Finally, E85 tune is in!!! | bmorecam | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 206 | 06-15-2011 08:25 PM |
| HP Tune question | Darth_Emma | Tuning / Diagnostics -- engine and transmission | 40 | 06-15-2010 10:42 AM |
| Drawbacks to a mail order tune | herkman | Tuning / Diagnostics -- engine and transmission | 24 | 05-28-2010 06:27 AM |
| Lets play a game | 2SSRS@Gen5diy | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 56 | 09-26-2009 10:08 AM |
| Undetectable Tunes - What You Should Know | kelley@vectormotorsports | V8 Bolt-Ons & Tunes | 159 | 09-18-2009 03:18 PM |